Monday, June 20, 2011

Prophecy - 9

I hope you're not tired of prophecy because there is a long way to go yet. There is so much involved in all this. We don't want to get it wrong though. We don't want to imagine things or make up pieces to fit our own suppositions. The Bible speaks. The Bible gives us clues and such clues that enable us to piece things together.


Do you remember when Jesus talked of speaking in parables?


Mat 13:10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?
Mat 13:11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
Mat 13:12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.
Mat 13:13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
Mat 13:14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
Mat 13:15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
Mat 13:16 But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
Mat 13:17 For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.


Prophecy is meant to be understood- why else would it be given? Many prophets throughout the Old Testament would prophesize and then within the time allotted their prophecy would come to pass. This happened over and over again. God used His prophets to warn people, to encourage people to have faith. Prophets served God's purpose. We can't forget that prophecies are a reality with God, not fables as so many would love to believe. Shove away the prophecies that are too hard to comprehend, that make absolutely no sense whatsoever. Hide those things we can't readily understand spoken in plain language. We can't do that. We have to understand that God has a purpose in all He does. Making prophecies hard for us to decipher is for a reason. The prophecies we are studying in Daniel right now reach all the way to the end of time. As long as we are alive and the end has not come this prophecy applies to us.


Like it or not, we are a part of this prophecy. People from the moment it was given were living in prophetic time. Watching things take place, seeing them unfold. Nebuchadnezzar had been told His kingdom would fall and it fell. The Medes and Persians fell. The Greeks fell. Rome was diminished and divided but still exists. Political kingdoms warred and had for many, many years warred against each other fighting, conquering and being conquered. What came into play in the last kingdom prophesized as it was being divided was a new force at play, a different force, a man-like force. Is this to say men were NOT behind the force of those other horns that came up first? They were, but, and this is something we have to really considered- they were not using any religious power to gain their conquered kingdoms, a religious power such as this one did not exist. This religious power was NOT the common pagan priest, not a soothsayer, not a magician that men were making a part of their entourage. This was a NEW power that hadn't existed before and the power came into being under our SAVIOR. This power became a counterfeit to our Savior's truth. This power put on a form of godliness. This power took the things of God and warped them from their pure simple truths into something to serve man, not God. And as they became corrupt, claiming God as their High Authority, they put themselves in league with the warring factions. They submitted to the kings and rulers, bowing to them, and agreeing to pervert their truths in order to gain power, to gain prestige, to gain acceptance, to stop their persecution. These men became as guilty as the Pharisees themselves that Jesus condemned. As they perverted Christianity into their own selfish ideas they aligned themselves with others and used their influence to rid themselves of their worst distracters desiring to make themselves more powerful and their enemies less powerful, destroying them if possible to further their own ambitions.


I need to jump back to history again here and bring up a few bits and pieces of the rising Papacy of the day as recorded as put forth from the Catholic Encyclopedia.


PLEASE read them if you can, it's NOT easy to read history if you've no inclination to do so but to catch these points here means bringing to life the reality of the time. The rising of that Little Horn displacing other Horns through its MOUTH, its EYES, not through its beasts strength, not through military power.


*

POPE St. Agapetus I
(Also AGAPITUS.)
Reigned 535-536. Date of birth uncertain; died 22 April, 536... Meanwhile Belisarius, after the very easy conquest of Sicily, was preparing for an invasion of Italy. The Gothic king, Theodehad, as a last resort, begged the aged pontiff to proceed to Constantinople and bring his personal influence to bear on the Emperor Justinian.


Pasted from


POPE St. Silverius
(Reigned 536-37).

The Empress Theodora, who favoured the Monophysites sought to bring about the election as pope of the Roman deacon Vigilius who was then at Constantinople and had given her the desired guarantees as to the Monophysites. However, Theodatus, King of the Ostrogoths, who wished to prevent the election of a pope connected with Constantinople, forestalled her, and by his influence the subdeacon Silverius was chosen.


However, the pope committed himself to nothing and Theodora now resolved to overthrow him and to gain the papal see for Vigilius. Troublous times befell Rome during the struggle that broke out in Italy between the Ostrogoths and the Byzantines after the death of Amalasuntha, daughter of Theodoric the Great. The Ostrogothic king, Vitiges, who ascended the throne in August, 536, besieged the city. The churches over the catacombs outside of the city were devastated, the graves of the martyrs in the catacombs themselves were broken open and desecrated. In December, 536, the Byzantine general Belisarius garrisoned Rome and was received by the pope in a friendly and courteous manner. Theodora sought to use Belisarius for the carrying out of her plan to depose Silverius and to put in his place the Roman deacon Vigilius, formerly apocrisary at Constantinople, who had now gone to Italy. Antonina, wife of Belisarius, influenced her husband to act as Theodora desired. By means of a forged letter the pope was accused of a treasonable agreement with the Gothic king who was besieging Rome. It was asserted that Silverius had offered the king to leave one of the city gates secretly open so as to permit the Goths to enter. Silverius was consequently arrested in March, 537, roughly stripped of his episcopal dress, given the clothing of a monk and carried off to exile in the East. Vigilius was consecrated Bishop of Rome in his stead.


Silverius was taken to Lycia where he was went to reside at Patara. The Bishop of Patara very soon discovered that the exiled pope was innocent. He journeyed to Constantinople and was able to lay before the Emperor Justinian such proofs of the innocence of the exile that the emperor wrote to Belisarius commanding a new investigation of the matter. Should it turn out that the letter concerning the alleged plot in favour of the Goths was forged, Silverius should be placed once more in possession of the papal see. At the same time the emperor allowed Silverius to return to Italy, and the latter soon entered the country, apparently at Naples. However, Vigilius arranged to take charge of his unlawfully deposed predecessor. He evidently acted in agreement with the Empress Theodora and was aided by Antonina, the wife of Belisarius. Silverius was taken to the Island of Palmaria in the Tyrrhenian Sea and kept their in close confinement. Here he died in consequence of the privations and harsh treatment he endured. The year of his death is unknown, but he probably did not live long after reaching Palmaria. He was buried on the island, according to the testimony of the "Liber pontificalis" on 20 June; his remains were never taken from Palmaria. According to the same witness he was invoked after death by the believers who visited his grave. In later times he was venerated as a saint. The earliest proof of this is given by a list of saints of the eleventh century (Mélanges d'archéologie et d'histoire, 1893, 169). The "Martyrologium" of Peter de Natalibus of the fourteenth century also contains his feast, which is recorded in the present Roman Martyrology on 20 June.


POPE Vigilius


Vigilius is said to have agreed to the plans of the intriguing empress who promised him the Papal See and a large sum of money (700 pounds of gold). After Agapetus's death on 22 April, 536, Vigilius return to Rome equipped with letters from the imperial Court and with money. Meanwhile Silverius had been made pope through the influence of the King of the Goths. Soon after this the Byzantine commander Belisarius garrisoned the city of Rome, which was, however, besieged again by the Goths. Vigilius gave Belisarius the letters from the Court of Constantinople, which recommended Vigilius himself for the Papal See. False accusations now led Belisarius to depose Silverius. Owing to the pressure exerted by the Byzantine commander, Vigilius was elected pope in place of Silverius and consecrated and enthroned on 29 March, 537. Vigilius brought it about that the unjustly deposed Silverius was put into his keeping where the late pope soon died from the harsh treatment he received. After the death of this predecessor Vigilius was recognized as pope by all the Roman clergy.


Vigilius refused to acknowledge the imperial edict and was called to Constantinople by Justinian, in order to settle the matter there with a synod. According to the Liber pontificalis on 20 November, while the pope was celebrating the feast of St. Cecilia in the Church of St. Cecilia in Trastevere, and before the service was fully ended, he was ordered by the imperial official Anthimus to start at once on the journey to Constantinople. The pope was taken immediately to a ship that waited in the Tiber, in order to be carried to the eastern capital, while a part of the populace cursed the pope and threw stones at the ship. Rome was now besieged by the Goths under Totila and the inhabitants fell into the greatest misery. Vigilius sent ships with grain to Rome but these were captured by the enemy. If the story related by the Liber pontificalis is essentially correct, the pope probably left Rome on 22 November, 545. He remained for a long time in Sicily, and reached Constantinople about the end of 546 or in January, 547.


Thus at the end of a sorrowful residence of eight years at Constantinople the pope was able, after coming to an understanding with the emperor, to start on his return to Rome in the spring of 555


Pasted from


*


Reading those few bits of historic information we can see how the Pope's entered into alliances with the military powers- the emperors, the empresses, the kings, the queens, the generals- rather than fight in the sense of retaining a pure alliance to God- they chose compromise with the world, they chose mammon, they chose the broad path and we know where that leads. It'd be great to be able to say this changed- but the Little Horn only continued to fit more and more into the prophetic picture as the Papal System.


More tomorrow by the grace of God.


May we pray with a sincere heart for His guidance in all things, in all truth. We need His guiding love, we need the Holy Spirit desperately so that we are not deceived as all but the very elect will be. Only through the righteousness of our Savior will we be saved by His grace.


In His amazing love!


Amen.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Prophecy 8 The Little Horn Revealed

The Little Horn-- (Yes, all in capital letters because these are the verses of the little horn out of Daniel 7 and we need to recap them once again, and maybe again and again.)


Dan 7:8 I CONSIDERED THE HORNS AND BEHOLD THERE CAME UP AMONG THEM ANOTHER LITTLE HORN, BEFORE WHOM THERE WERE THREE OF THE FIRST HORNS PLUCKED UP BY THE ROOTS: AND, BEHOLD, IN THIS HORN WERE EYES LIKE THE EYES OF MAN, AND A MOUTH SPEAKING GREAT THINGS.


Characteristics-

Little horn
Three of the ten horns plucked up by the roots
Eyes like a man
Mouth speaking great things


Dan 7:11 I BEHELD THEN BECAUSE OF THE VOICE OF THE GREAT WORDS WHICH THE HORN SPAKE: I BEHELD EVEN TILL THE BEAST WAS SLAIN, AND HIS BODY DESTROYED, AND GIVEN TO THE BURNING FLAME.


Characteristics-

Voice of the great words which the horn spoke


Dan 7:20 AND OF THE TEN HORNS THAT WERE IN HIS HEAD AND OF THE OTHER WHICH CAME UP, AND BEFORE WHOM THREE FELL, EVEN OF THE HORN THAT HAD EYES, AND A MOUTH THAT SPAKE VERY GREAT THINGS, WHOSE LOOK WAS MORE STOUT THAN HIS FELLOWS.


Characteristics-

Before whom three of the ten horns fell.
Horn that had eyes
Horn that had a mouth speaking great things
Horn whose appearance was more stout than the other horns


Dan 7:21,22 I BEHELD AND THE SAME HORN MADE WAR WITH THE SAINTS AND PREVAILED AGAINST THEM. UNTIL THE ANCIENT OF DAYS CAME AND JUDGMENT WAS GIVEN TO THE SAINTS OF THE MOST HIGH AND THE TIME CAME THAT THE SAINTS POSSESSED THE KINGDOM.


Characteristics-

Little horn made war with the saints


Dan 7:24,24 AND THE TEN HORNS OUT OF THIS KINGDOM ARE TEN KINGS THAT SHALL ARISE AND ANOTHER SHALL RISE AFTER THEM AND HE SHALL BE DIVERSE FROM THE FIRST AND SHALL SUBDUE THREE KINGS. AND HE SHALL SPEAK GREAT WORDS AGAINST THE MOST HIGH, AND SHALL WEAR OUT THE SAINTS OF THE MOST HIGH AND THINK TO CHANGE TIMES AND LAWS AND THEY SHALL BE GIVEN INTO HIS HAND UNTIL A TIME AND TIMES AND THE DIVIDING OF TIME.


Characteristics-

Another kingdom different from the others
Subdues three of the other kingdoms
Speaks great words against the Most High
Wear out the saints of the Most High
Think to change times and laws
In control for a time and times and dividing of time


This is all stuff we've reviewed over the last few lessons but we can't get this wrong, we have to study it deeply and prayerfully. We aren't going to find this kingdom quite so easily as we were able to understand that Babylon was overthrown by the Medes and Persians, or that the Medes and Persians were overthrown by the Greeks, or that Greek would be overthrown by the Romans. How much more simpler it would all be if yet another came in and over threw the Romans, but that's not how it happened. The Roman empire wasn't just over thrown by one entity but many. Out of those many there was going to come up a SPECIAL entity, a very special entity from what the Bible tells us.


Daniel 7 isn't the only chapter that speaks of this power, how could it be when this power was going to exist until the very end of time? Let's go on to Daniel chapter 8 and catch yet another picture of this power with even more details added to this entire picture of history.


Dan 8:1 In the third year of the reign of king Belshazzar a vision appeared unto me, even unto me Daniel, after that which appeared unto me at the first.
Dan 8:2 And I saw in a vision; and it came to pass, when I saw, that I was at Shushan in the palace, which is in the province of Elam; and I saw in a vision, and I was by the river of Ulai.
Dan 8:3 Then I lifted up mine eyes, and saw, and, behold, there stood before the river a ram which had two horns: and the two horns were high; but one was higher than the other, and the higher came up last.


Sound familiar? Remember this--


Dan 7:5 And behold another beast, a second, like to a bear, and it raised up itself on one side, and it had three ribs in the mouth of it between the teeth of it: and they said thus unto it, Arise, devour much flesh.


Raised itself up on one side- two horns one higher than the other.


Yes, this is yet another representation of Medes and Persians.


Dan 8:20 The ram which thou sawest having two horns are the kings of Media and Persia.


So with that in mind lets keep reading- not at this point to note even more details on the kingdoms we are sure about, but to keep things in context until we learn more of that little horn which we have yet to put a name to.


Dan 8:4 I saw the ram pushing westward, and northward, and southward; so that no beasts might stand before him, neither was there any that could deliver out of his hand; but he did according to his will, and became great.
Dan 8:5 And as I was considering, behold, an he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth, and touched not the ground: and the goat had a notable horn between his eyes.


Dan 8:21 And the rough goat is the king of Grecia: and the great horn that is between his eyes is the first king.


Dan 8:6 And he came to the ram that had two horns, which I had seen standing before the river, and ran unto him in the fury of his power.
Dan 8:7 And I saw him come close unto the ram, and he was moved with choler against him, and smote the ram, and brake his two horns: and there was no power in the ram to stand before him, but he cast him down to the ground, and stamped upon him: and there was none that could deliver the ram out of his hand.
Dan 8:8 Therefore the he goat waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and for it came up four notable ones toward the four winds of heaven.


Dan 8:9 And out of one of them came forth a little horn, which waxed exceeding great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land.
Dan 8:10 And it waxed great, even to the host of heaven; and it cast down some of the host and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them.
Dan 8:11 Yea, he magnified himself even to the prince of the host, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down.
Dan 8:12 And an host was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practised, and prospered.


A LITTLE HORN
Waxed exceeding great
Waxed great even to the host of heaven
Cast down some of the host of the stars to the ground and stamped upon them
Magnified himself to the prince of the host
By him the daily sacrifice was taken away
The place of his sanctuary was cast down
A host given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of sin
Cast down to the ground-

And PRACTISED and PROSPERED.


Dan 8:13 Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?
Dan 8:14 And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.
Dan 8:15 And it came to pass, when I, even I Daniel, had seen the vision, and sought for the meaning, then, behold, there stood before me as the appearance of a man.
Dan 8:16 And I heard a man's voice between the banks of Ulai, which called, and said, Gabriel, make this man to understand the vision.
Dan 8:17 So he came near where I stood: and when he came, I was afraid, and fell upon my face: but he said unto me, Understand, O son of man: for at the time of the end shall be the vision.
Dan 8:18 Now as he was speaking with me, I was in a deep sleep on my face toward the ground: but he touched me, and set me upright.
Dan 8:19 And he said, Behold, I will make thee know what shall be in the last end of the indignation: for at the time appointed the end shall be.


Dan 8:20 The ram which thou sawest having two horns are the kings of Media and Persia.
Dan 8:21 And the rough goat is the king of Grecia: and the great horn that is between his eyes is the first king.
Dan 8:22 Now that being broken, whereas four stood up for it, four kingdoms shall stand up out of the nation, but not in his power.


Dan 8:23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up.
Dan 8:24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
Dan 8:25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
Dan 8:26 And the vision of the evening and the morning which was told is true: wherefore shut thou up the vision; for it shall be for many days.
Dan 8:27 And I Daniel fainted, and was sick certain days; afterward I rose up, and did the king's business; and I was astonished at the vision, but none understood it.


Magnify himself in his heart
By peace shall destroy many


We know for a fact when Rome takes over Greece that out of Rome comes this LITTLE HORN, which if you ask me seems like the biggest horn of them all but in the disguise of being a little horn. Remember the old wolf in sheep's clothing? This seems like the exact same principle here. We have a seemingly little power that has more power than all the other kingdoms, more power than all the kingdoms before it but it's a power wielded in a much different manner. It's a power that gets control and keeps some form of control, keeps living despite any future opposition, and never stops living in some manner until all is said and done in our world. This power exists TODAY. This same power that began coming out of the Roman power and entering into existence fully when it subdued, overthrew, caused to fall down three other powers.


So that seems to be a bit of a keynote there in all this doesn't it? Those three kingdoms being disposed of. So who disposed of them?


If we look at history it tells us this…


Under Constantine, Christianity did not become the exclusive religion of the state, but enjoyed imperial preference, because the Emperor supported it with generous privileges. Constantine established the principle that emperors should not settle questions of doctrine, but should summon general ecclesiastical councils for that purpose. The Synod of Arles was convened by Constantine, and the First Council of Nicaea showcased his claim to be head of the Church.[25]

Pasted from


Constantine the Great (Latin: Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus Augustus;[3] c. 27 February 272[2] – 22 May 337), also known as Constantine I or Saint Constantine,[4] was Roman Emperor from 306 to 337. Well known for being the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity,

Pasted from


As the emperor who used his government to empower Christianity throughout the Roman Empire and moved the capital to the banks of the Bosporus, Constantine was a ruler of major historical importance, but he has always been a controversial figure.[6]

Pasted from


In 321, Constantine instructed that Christians and non-Christians should be united in observing the venerable day of the sun, referencing the esoteric eastern sun-worship which Aurelian had helped introduce, and his coinage still carried the symbols of the sun cult until 324. Even after the pagan gods had disappeared from the coinage, Christian symbols appeared only as Constantine's personal attributes: the chi rho between his hands or on his labarum, but never on the coin itself.[205] Even when Constantine dedicated the new capital of Constantinople, which became the seat of Byzantine Christianity for a millennium, he did so wearing the Apollonian sun-rayed Diadem.

Constantine burning Arian books


The reign of Constantine established a precedent for the position of the emperor as having some influence within the religious discussions going on within the Catholic Church of that time, e.g., the dispute over Arianism. Constantine himself disliked the risks to societal stability that religious disputes and controversies brought with them, preferring where possible to establish an orthodoxy.[206] The emperor saw it as his duty to ensure that God was properly worshiped in his empire, and that what proper worship consisted would be determined by the Church.[207] In 316, Constantine acted as a judge in a North African dispute concerning the validity of Donatism. After deciding against the Donatists, Constantine led an army of Christians against the Donatist Christians. After 300 years of pacifism, this was the first intra-Christian persecution. More significantly, in 325 he summoned the Council of Nicaea, effectively the first Ecumenical Council (unless the Council of Jerusalem is so classified). Nicaea was dealt mostly with Arianism. Constantine also enforced the prohibition of the First Council of Nicaea against celebrating the Lord's Supper on the day before the Jewish Passover (14 Nisan) (see Quartodecimanism and Easter controversy).[208

Pasted from


*******

This bit of history is laying the groundwork of that little horn. This Roman Emperor was the first to bring Christianity into an acceptable place among the mainstream of the time. Constantine led an ARMY of CHRISTIANS- against other Christians. Government and the Christian religion mingle here for the first time with the government of the time on the side of the Christians.


Why is this important? Because from here on in politics mingling with Christian religion plays a HUGE part in the goings on of the overthrow of the Roman rule. Anyone that wants to ignore this is foolish because religion is what God is all about, yes? God gave the vision to Nebuchadnezzar , it was by God's design that Nebuchadnezzar have a kingdom such as he had. God could see the grand picture and in that grand design He knew the succession that would take place. The Medes and Persians would follow Babylon, the Greeks would follow the Medes and Persians and yes, then the Roman rule would follow. God's son was born into the world under the Roman rule. Christianity came into existence because of Christ, which should go without saying but we have to understand how this all fits together. Under the fourth beast's rule our Savior was born and He didn't come as a military force conquering but as a spiritual force conquering over Satan, over sin. Born under the fourth beast, Christ also died under the fourth beast's rule. After His death as His followers began the great mission to spread His word many different groups formed out of those followers. No longer simple followers of Christ much more began to come into play. Christ did not set down a plan of action for His followers other than to spread His message. Christ knew that His Apostles would be natural leaders of those that followed and people would look to them to lead them in their new found beliefs. The church began to grow, but the church not as an organization like we have it today. Jesus had His followers and they spread the word without forming an organization and bringing in worldly politics. In fact Jesus wanted the two to be separate, didn't He?


Mat 22:21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.


Jesus didn't tell His disciples to give the things that are Caesar's to God, nor did He tell them to give that which is God's to Caesar.


Did it remain so? No. Not in the way it was intended. Caesar's things and God's things quickly became mingled, but not by the Apostle's or their teachings. Satan wouldn't stand still and let God's people flourish without trying to destroy them. Satan had to infiltrate God's people and using His influence get them to turn from God while believing they are doing no such thing. Satan had to corrupt things and if you think otherwise then you aren't reading your Bibles and understanding by the grace of God. Satan is a destroyer, a deceiver, and he will remain so right until the end of time and his destruction in the lake of fire.


Satan didn't take time off when Christ died to allow Christ's followers to flourish. Satan was right there from the start.


Paul said this….


2Th 2:7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
2Th 2:8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:


The mystery of iniquity doth ALREADY WORK!


Satan wasn't sleeping. Satan was going to be right there and you can bet your life that his deception was near to perfect in deceiving all but the very elect as it is today.


Now this LITTLE HORN power was going to be DIFFERENT than all the rest, right? Well, let's think about it for a moment, seriously think about everything that's transpired.


Until the Roman kingdom Christians did NOT exist, Christ hadn't lived and died for mankind until the Roman rule. Now this little horn was going to come up out of the Roman rule just as the ten horns before it would.


The MOST striking difference in the overthrow of the fourth beast-- a kingdom that would still continue on in a much LESSER manner but not as a world ruling kingdom (remember the iron and clay mixed in the toes of the statue)-- was the fact the world would be living in a time of Christ! The Babylons did not live in this time, the Medes and Persians did not live in the time of a Messiah realized, the Greeks did not live and rule in the time of our Savior's birth, life, and death, but the ROMAN kingdom did.


Now this Little Horn is a power that opposes Christ, yes? This Little Horn is a power that will speak great things, and think to change times and laws, this little power will speak out against the Most High. This Little Horn would become an immense power that would ultimately throughout all its reign whether in full destroying power, making war with the saints, or as a power seemingly overthrown only to continue on until the end, would be instrumental in the uprooting of three worldly kingdoms that previously took part in some way to overthrow the tremendous Roman Kingdom. We CANNOT be ignorant to the fact that this Little Horn with its strangeness, with it's different power would be a religious power- we are told outright that this power would take part in speaking out against God, would think to change times and laws- whose times? Whose Laws? Gods. Would try to wear out the saints of God completely.


The previous kingdoms had very little to do with God and nothing to do with the saints of God- the Christ followers of which there would always be a few true followers. REMEMBER that path is NARROW!


Mat 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.


Those were Jesus' words! Jesus didn't envision a great mass of true followers. That gate is strait, that way is narrow and FEW will find it compared to the masses. Spreading His message, the gospel of His kingdom, would gain followers yes, but never a majority. It's the truth! This is Christ's truth! This is the truth of the Bible!


It's safe for us to truly be able to say this Little Horn was a power that was different because it would mingle religion with politics. What power did this way back then? What power came into existence that had a part to play in the politics, the wars being waged at the time? Seriously, we cannot ignore this aspect whatsoever! Satan would have us ignore it, Satan wants us left completely in the dark! Satan will gladly tell us anything we want to hear that is soothing to our ears- all to keep us from Christ!


God told us outright that this little power would be DIFFERENT than the others. I can look at all the military powers of the time just as you can and there is no striking difference from one military to the next. Remember the different characteristics of the beasts… eagle's wings, bear like, four wings and so on? Those were traits that each of those conquering armies, conquering kingdoms possessed. The ten horns were all basically alike right? They didn't differentiate between the ten horns with this characteristic and that. They were all similar. Then we have ONE little horn that comes up and it's NOT similar to the others. About the same time all this is going on, the ten horns are conquering bits and pieces of the then Roman Kingdom tearing it apart so that it would no longer ever be a whole Roman Kingdom again, about this time something NEW, something DIFFERENT comes into play, something that would continue on until the end of the world, changing as prophecy depicts throughout time.


Christianity entered politics. You can scoff if you like, but this was much different than the worship of pagan gods. Christianity God's truth, the Salvation of God offered through the sacrifice of His Son. This wasn't the Jewish God minus Jesus that came into play- not at all even though that existed for a long, long, long time before the first advent of our Savior. This was new compared to every other god in existence. Christians were outcast and persecuted by the Roman government for a long, long time. Christians were thrown to the lions, tortured, killed in various ways, this is history. But then something happened- those in charge, those in the government opposed to Christians came to accept it and the persecution stopped allowing Christianity to become part of the politics.


When we read this…


'As the emperor who used his government to empower Christianity throughout the Roman Empire and moved the capital to the banks of the Bosporus, Constantine was a ruler of major historical importance, but he has always been a controversial figure.[6] '


… we have to realize that a NEW power was underway. Now ask yourself what power had these characteristics over time…


Three of the ten horns plucked up by the roots
Eyes like a man
Mouth speaking great things
Another kingdom different from the others
Subdues three of the other kingdoms
Speaks great words against the Most High
Wear out the saints of the Most High
Think to change times and laws
In control for a time and times and dividing of time


Jumping back to the 3 that were subdued--


His general Belisarius swiftly conquered the Vandal Kingdom in North Africa, extending Roman control to the Atlantic Ocean. Subsequently Belisarius, Narses, and other generals conquered the Ostrogothic Kingdom, restoring Dalmatia, Sicily, Italy, and Rome to the empire after being under barbarian control for over half a century

Pasted from


From the middle of the fifth century onward increasingly arduous tasks confronted the emperors of the East in ecclesiastical matters. For one thing, the radicals on all sides felt themselves constantly repelled by the creed adopted by the Council of Chalcedon to defend the biblical doctrine of the nature of Christ and bridge the gap between the dogmatic parties. The letter of Pope Leo I to Flavian of Constantinople was widely considered in the East as the work of Satan; so that nobody cared to hear of the Church of Rome. The emperors, however, had a policy of preserving the unity between Constantinople and Rome; and this remained possible only if they did not swerve from the line defined at Chalcedon. In addition, the factions in the East which had become stirred up and disaffected because of Chalcedon needed restraining and pacifying. This problem proved the more difficult because, in the East, the dissenting groups exceeded supporters of Chalcedon both in numerical strength and in intellectual ability. Tension from the incompatibility of the two aims grew: whoever chose Rome and the West must renounce the East, and vice versa.


Justinian entered the arena of ecclesiastical statecraft shortly after his uncle's accession in 518, and put an end to the Monophysite schism that had prevailed between Rome and Constantinople since 483. The recognition of the Roman see as the highest ecclesiastical authority[60] remained the cornerstone of his Western policy. Offensive as it was to many in the East, nonetheless Justinian felt himself entirely free to take a Despotic stance toward the popes such as Silverius and Vigilius. While no compromise could ever be accepted by the dogmatic wing of the church, his sincere efforts at reconciliation gained him the approval of the major body of the church. A signal proof was his attitude in the Theopaschite controversy. At the outset he was of the opinion that the question turned on a quibble of words. By degrees, however, Justinian came to understand that the formula at issue not only appeared orthodox, but might also serve as a conciliatory measure toward the Monophysites, and he made a vain attempt to do this in the religious conference with the followers of Severus of Antioch, in 533.


Again, Justinian moved toward compromise in the religious edict of 15 March 533,[61] and congratulated himself that Pope John II admitted the orthodoxy of the imperial confession.[62] The serious blunder that he had made at the beginning by abetting a severe persecution of the Monophysite bishops and monks and thereby embittering the population of vast regions and provinces, he remedied eventually. His constant aim now remained to win over the Monophysites, yet not to surrender the Chalcedonian faith. For many at court, he did not go far enough: Theodora especially would have rejoiced to see the Monophysites favored unreservedly. Justinian, however, felt restrained by the complications that would have ensued with the West. But in the condemnation of the Three Chapters Justinian tried to satisfy both the East and the West, but succeeded in satisfying neither. Although the pope assented to the condemnation, the West believed that the emperor had acted contrary to the decrees of Chalcedon. Though many delegates emerged in the East subservient

Pasted from


During the Early Church, the bishops of Rome enjoyed no temporal power until the time of Constantine. After the fall of Rome (the "Middle Ages"), the papacy was influenced by the temporal rulers of and surrounding the Italian peninsula; these periods are known as the Ostrogothic Papacy, Byzantine Papacy, and Frankish Papacy. Over time, the papacy consolidated its territorial claims to a portion of the peninsula known as the Papal States. Thereafter, the role of neighboring sovereigns was replaced by powerful Roman families during the saeculum obscurum, the Crescentii era, and the Tusculan Papacy.

Pasted from


Many popes in the first three centuries of the Christian era are obscure figures. Several suffered martyrdom along with members of their flock in periods of persecution. Most of them engaged in intense theological arguments with other bishops.

Pasted from

*******


Yes, we are going to get a history lesson here and it's important… did you just read that above? Many popes in the first 3 centuries are obscure figures. So AFTER the first 3 centuries something happens and the popes start to play a very prominent role in politics.


Let's read a bit and see if it's easy to spot the fact that the influence of papal authority in politics played a part in the uprooting of kingdoms.


Since the fall of Rome


Pope Simplicius (468-483), the pope during the end of the Western Roman Empire
Pope Simplicius (468-483) was the pope who witnessed the final overthrow of the Western Roman Empire, and fell ill in 483.[3] The papal election of March 483 was the first to take place without the existence of a Western Roman emperor.[4] While the pope still lived, the praetorian prefect, Caecina Decius Maximus Basilius called together the Roman Senate, Roman clergy, and the leading local bishops in the Imperial Mausoleum.[4] Simplicitus had issued an admonitio declaring that no election of his successor should be valid without the consent of Basilius.[4] Basilius was both the leader of the Roman aristocracy and the Chief Minister of Odoacer, the "king of Italy."[4] Simplicius was succeeded by Pope Felix III (483-492), Pope Gelasius I (492-496), and Pope Anastasius II (496-498).


The first schism


The role of the Ostrogoths became clear in the first schism. On November 22, 498, both Pope Symmachus and Antipope Laurentius were elected pope.[5] Symmachus was approved by the Roman Senate,[6] but both Byzantine Emperor Anastasius I and the Gothic King Theodoric the Great originally supported Laurentius, who was installed in the Lateran Palace.[5]

Symmachus and Laurentius resorted to bribing Theodoric for his support, with funds from the Roman aristocrats who supported them.[7] This is the first documented case of papal simony, wherein both candidates attempted to bribe the royal councilors, if not Theodoric himself, to influence his choice.[8] According to DeCormenin and de Lahaye, also influencing Theodoric to side with Symmachus and expel Laurentius from Rome was his fear that the latter was too influenced by the Byzantine ruler,[5] but according to Richards this is "simply not borne out by the evidence."[9] In announcing his decision, Theodoric cited the majority of clerical support and the fact of prior ordination.[10]


On March 1, 499, Symmachus declared to a synod in Old Saint Peter's Basilica his plan for campaign finance reform in future sede vacantes.[7] Laurentius was among those who signed his statute, having been appointed as Bishop of Nuceria in consolation for having lost his claim to the papacy.[7] Symmachus decreed that reigning bishops would be able to designate their own successors, ending the participation of the laity for at least a half-century.[8]


When the supporters of Laurentius tried to depose Symmachus for having celebrated Easter according to the wrong calendar, Theodoric called the pope before him in Ariminum to resolve the matter.[11] When Symmachus arrived, he discovered that the charges against him included unchastity and maladministration of church property, and fled back to Rome.[11] His flight bolstered the Laurentian party, who succeeded in persuading Theodoric to send a visitor to Rome to have Easter celebrated according to the Greek calendar and to convene a synod to consider the charges against Symmachus.[11] Peter of Altinum, the bishop of Istria, came to Rome to oversee the new Easter celebration and took over the administration of the Holy See pending the outcome of the synod.[11]


In the first two sessions, the assembled Italian bishops were unable to agree on the appropriate procedures to settle the matter, but the third session acquitted Symmachus.[12] Theodoric took a rather hands-off approach to the synod, refusing repeated requests for him to travel to Rome and resolve the matter personally.[13] According to Richards:


"There is something really rather shocking about the way in which the assembled bishops of the Catholic church fell over themselves to persuade a heretic barbarian to decide who the pope should be. It makes nonsense of the idea of an articulation of papal monarchial theory in which the church was superior to the lay authorities. Both the Symmachian and Laurentian factions appealed to the king for arbitration in 489 and both sides accepted his convocation of a synod. Symmachus, indeed, finally submitted a decision about his case to God and the king, hardly the sort of behavior one would accept from a champion of papal supremacy. Indeed, the regularity with which both sides invoked the intervention of the king suggests a widely held view of his impartiality."[14]


Despite the synod, Laurentius was able to return to Rome, take over much of the papal patrimony and churches of the city, and rule from the Lateran Palace while Symmachus remained in St. Peter's.[15]


After Symmachus


According to Richards, "the death of Pope Symmachus in July 514 was a crucial test for the election regulations after nearly sixteen controversial years of Symmachian rule."[16] However, the "Symmachian old guard" controlled a supermajority of the priests and deacons and thus were able to elect Pope Hormisdas (514-523) after only seven days.[16] Hormisdas was likely appointed by Symmachus himself, "a procedure which was implicit in the electoral regulations."[16] Hormisdas had prepared complicated written instructions for his envoys to the East long before his election and kept Theodoric well appraised of his negotiations with the Byzantines.[16]


Hormisdas was succeeded by Pope John I (523-526). Theodoric married his daughters to the kings of Burgundy, the Visigoths, and Vandals, fellow adherents of Arianism.[17] However, Clovis, king of the Franks, renounced Arianism in 506, as did Sigismund of Burgundy in 516; acts that could possibly describe the act of having "converted to Catholicism."[17] In 523, Eutharic, king of the Visigoths, ceased persecuting non-Arians, around the same time that the Eastern Church began its persecution of Arians.[17] Theodoric created an Ostrogothic navy and sent an emissary to the East, head by Pope John I himself in 526.[17]


Pope Felix IV (526-530) was the first successor of Symmachus to have trouble designating a successor.

John I was succeeded by Pope Felix IV (526-530). Felix IV was the recommendation of Theodoric and his election was confirmed by Athalaric.[18] He was thus appointed "for all practical purposes" by Theodoric.[19] The process of predecessor appointment was used without serious issue until the death of Felix IV, who had given his pallium to Pope Boniface II on his deathbed in 530 and decreed excommunication of any who refused to accept the succession.[8] The Roman Senate disliked the lack of election and denounced Felix, affirming a decree of Pope Anastasius II, which had prohibited the practice of a pope designating a successor.[8] Boniface II was supported only by a minority of the clergy, with the larger share supporting Dioscorus, with only Dioscorus's death halting the schism.[8]


Boniface II attempted to re-entrench the practice of appointing his successor, but the public outcry was too great, resulting in a highly disputed election in 532 characterized by widespread accounts of bribery and coercion, which resulted in Pope John II (the first to take a papal name).[20] Pope John was chosen by Athalaric to avoid a split between the Byzantine and Gothic factions.[21] Athalaric, the Ostrogoth king, forced John II to approve decrees that banned any private agreements to elect a pope and enacting limits on the amount of money that could be spent during a papal election (an early example of campaign finance reform).[20] In fact, Athalaric himself was able to engineer the election of Pope Silverius, the son of Pope Hormisdas, upon John II's death.[20]


Theodahad threw his support behind Pope Agapetus I and was thus "well placed to coerce the new pope Agapetus, for he had been elected with his support."[22] Theodahad also played a decisive role in the selection of Pope Silverius (536-537), the legitimate son of Hormisdas.[23]


Effects of Justinian's reconquest


Main article: Byzantine Papacy


After Justinian I retook Rome in the Gothic War (535–554), "to interfere in the papacy had been one of the first things Justinian had done as soon as his armies got a foothold in Italy."[24] Long before he had completed his victory over the Ostrogoths, Justinian I had his commander Belisarius depose the pro-Gothic Pope Silverius (536–537), and install Pope Vigilius (537–555), the former papal apocrisiarius to Constantinople, in his place.[24] Silverius died and Vigilius was ordained in 537, while the Goths rallied and laid siege to Rome.[24] In 542, King Totila recaptured Rome and by the time Justinian's new general Narses recaptured the city in 552, Vigilius was no longer in Rome

Pasted from



Did you read ALL that? I really, really hope you did, because it is CLEAR that the role of the papacy in politics had become very popular and suddenly where never before had this sort of thing happened- the papacy was involved in politics to the point CONQUERING kings were concerning themselves with the Popes in charge because they KNEW the power they were coming to have!!!


Remember the characteristics--


Different than the others
Mouth speaking great things
Eyes of a man


This power wasn't the usual conquering power this was PAPAL power!!!


Tell me you don' t know off the top of your head about the Inquisitions done in the name of the Papacy. Tell me you don't know of the persecution people endured at the hands of the Papacy. Tell me you don't know that Protestantism came out of protesting the Papacy! Tell me the Papacy doesn't exist today. It does!!! From then until now it exists! From then until the end of time it WILL exist.


In fact this was just in the news--


On world stage and behind closed doors, Vatican works diplomatic levers

By John Thavis
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Vatican City is the world's smallest state, but it's still considered a diplomatic nerve center, a place where the universal church meets global politics.

*


So tell me this little horn isn't holding true to the prophecy of Daniel! It is! It does! And yet so many don't want to see. So many want to confuse the issue with many, many other things so they don't have to face the truth.


Daniel's prophecy… Daniel's GOD GIVEN prophecy is true and all that was predicted has come and will come to pass!


I'm going to add yet more here and pray that that Holy Spirit moves you to read it all because of the truth it holds, the history it presents in a way that I cannot without access to the same texts of our world's history.


*******

Challenge of Arianism.--But the fourth century was destined to witness an obstacle thrown across the path of this ambitious dream. The prophecy had declared that the power represented by the little horn would "subdue three kings." In the rise and development of Arianism early in the fourth century and the challenge it presented to papal supremacy, we find the causes leading to the plucking up of three of the kingdoms of Western Rome by the papal power.


Arius, parish priest of the ancient and influential church of Alexandria, promulgated his doctrine to the world, occasioning so fierce a controversy in the Christian church that a general council was called at Nicaea, by the emperor Constantine in A.D. 325, to consider and rule upon its teaching. Arius maintained "that the Son was totally and essentially distinct from the Father; that He was the first and noblest of those be-

Page 121

ings whom the Father had created out of nothing, the instrument by whose subordinate operation the Almighty Father formed the universe, and therefore inferior to the Father, both in nature and dignity." This opinion was condemned by the council, which decreed that Christ was of one and the same substance with the Father. Hereupon Arius was banished to Illyria, and his followers were compelled to give their assent to the creed composed on that occasion. [5]


The controversy itself, however, was not to be disposed of in this summary manner. For ages it continued to agitate the Christian world, the Arians everywhere becoming the bitter enemies of the pope and of the Roman Catholic Church. It was evident that the spread of Arianism would check the onward march of Catholicism, and that the possession of Italy and it renowned capital by a people of the Arian persuasion would be fatal to the supremacy of a Catholic bishop. The prophecy, however, had declared that this horn symbolizing the papacy would rise to supreme power, and that in reaching this position it would subdue three kings.


Little Horn Overthrows Three Arian Powers.--Some difference of opinion has existed in regard to the particular powers which were overthrown by the papacy in its rise to power. In this connection the remarks of Albert Barnes seem pertinent: "In the confusion that existed on the breaking up of the Roman Empire, and the imperfect accounts of the transactions which occurred in the rise of the papal power, it would not be wonderful if it should be difficult to find events distinctly recorded that would be in all respects an accurate and absolute fulfillment of the vision. Yet it is possible to make out the fulfillment of this with a good degree of certainty in the history of the papacy." [6]


Joseph Mede supposes the three kingdoms plucked up to have been the Greeks, the Lombards, and the Franks; and Sir


Page 122
Issac Newton supposes they were the exarchate of Ravenna, the Lombards, and the senate and dukedom of Rome. Thomas Newton [7] states serious objections to both these suppositions. The Franks could not have been one of these kingdoms, for they were never plucked up. The Lombards could not have been one, for they were never made subject to the popes. Says Albert Barnes further, "I do not find, indeed, that the kingdom of the Lombards was, as is commonly stated among the number of the temporal sovereignties that became subject to the authority of the popes." [8] The senate and dukedom of Rome could not have been one, for as they never constituted one of the ten kingdoms, three of which were to be plucked up before the little horn.


But we apprehend the chief difficulty in the application made by these eminent commentators lay in the fact that they supposed that the prophecy respecting the exaltation of the papacy had not been fulfilled, and could not have been until the pope became a temporal prince. Therefore they sought to find an accomplishment of the prophecy in the events which led to the pope's temporal sovereignty. But evidently the prophecy of verses 24, 25, refers, not to his civil power, but to his power to domineer over the minds and consciences of men. The papacy reached this position, A.D. 538, as will hereafter appear.


The word "before" used in verses 8 and 20 represents the Chaldee {HEBREW CHARACTERS IN PRINTED TEXT}, qadam, with the root meaning "front." Combined with min, meaning "from," as it is in these two verses, Davidson translates it "from the presence of," and Gesenius says it is equivalent to the Hebrew {HEBREW CHARACTERS IN PRINTED TEXT}, lipna, meaning "in the presence of." It therefore has here the meaning "before" in the sense of "place," as it does in the same phrase in verse 10, where it is properly translated in the Authorized Version "from before Him." We have, then, in verse 8 the picture of the


Page 123
little horn pressing in among the ten and forcibly plucking up three horns from before it. In verse 20, it is declared that the three horns "fell" from before it, as if overcome by it. In verse 24, we read that another king, representing the little horn, "shall subdue three kings [horns]," evidently by acts of force. While the word qadam is also used in the sense of time, as in the word "before" in verse 7, there can scarcely be a doubt that it is used in the sense of place in the three verses cited above. With this interpretation Edward Elliott clearly agrees. (See page 128.)


The position is here confidently taken that the three powers, or horns, plucked up by the roots were the Heruli, the Vandals, and the Ostrogoths; and this position rests upon reliable historical data. Odoacer, the leader of the Heruli, was the first of the barbarians who reigned over the Romans. He took the throne of Italy, A.D. 476. Of his religious belief Gibbon says: "Like the rest of the barbarians he had been instructed in the Arian heresy; but he revered the monastic and episcopal characters; and the silence of the Catholics attests the toleration which they enjoyed." [9]


The same author says: "The Ostrogoths, the Burgundians, the Suevi, and the Vandals, who had listened to the eloquence of the Latin clergy, preferred the more intelligible lessons of their domestic teachers; and Arianism was adopted as the national faith of the warlike converts who were seated on the ruins of the Western Empire. This irreconcilable difference of religion was a perpetual source of jealousy and hatred; and the reproach of barbarian was embittered by the more odious epithet of heretic. The heroes of the north, who had submitted with some reluctance to believe that all their ancestors were in hell, were astonished and exasperated to learn that they themselves had only changed the mode of their eternal condemnation." [10]


Page 124
The Arian doctrine had a marked influence on the church at that time, as will be observed in the following paragraphs: "The whole of the vast Gothic population which descended on the Roman Empire, so far as it was Christian at all, held to the faith of the Alexandrian heretic. Our first Teutonic version of the Scriptures was by an Arian missionary, Ulfilas. The first conqueror of Rome, Alaric, the first conqueror of Africa, Genseric, were Arians. Theodoric the Great, king of Italy, and hero of the 'Nibelungenlied,' was an Arian. The vacant place in his massive tomb at Ravenna is a witness of the vengeance which the Orthodox took on his memory, when on their triumph they tore down the porphyry vase in which his Arian subjects had enshrined his ashes." [11]


Ranke states: "But she [the church] fell, as was inevitable, into many embarrassments, and found herself in an entirely altered condition. A pagan people took possession of Britain; Arian kings seized the greater part of the remaining West; while the Lombards, long attached to Arianism, and as neighbors most dangerous and hostile, established a powerful sovereignty before the very gates of Rome. The Roman bishops, meanwhile, beset on all sides, exerted themselves, with all the prudence and pertinacity which have remained their peculiar attributes, to regain the mastery--at least in their patriarchal diocese." [12]


Machiavelli says: "Nearly all the wars which the northern barbarians carried on in Italy, it may be here remarked, were occasioned by the pontiffs; and the hordes with which the country was inundated, were generally called in by them." [13]


The relation which these Arian kings sustained to the pope is shown in the following testimony from Mosheim in his church history:


"On the other hand, it is certain, from a variety of the most authentic records, that both the emperors and the nations in


Page 125
general were far from being disposed to bear with patience the yoke of servitude which the see of Rome was arrogantly imposing upon the Christian church. The Gothic princes set bounds to the power of the bishop of Rome in Italy, permitted none to be raised to the pontificate without their approbation, and reserved to themselves the right of judging concerning the legality of every new election." [14]


An instance in proof of this statement occurs in the history of Odoacer, the first Arian king above mentioned. [15] When, on the death of Pope Simplicius, A.D. 483, the clergy and people had assembled for the election of a new pope, suddenly Basilius, lieutenant of King Odoacer, appeared in the assembly, expressed his surprise that any such work as appointing a successor to the deceased pope should be undertaken without him, in the name of the king declared all that had been done null and void, and ordered the election to be begun anew.


Meanwhile, Zeno, the emperor of the East, and friend of the pope, was anxious to drive Odoacer out of Italy, a movement which he soon had the satisfaction of seeing accomplished without trouble to himself. Theodoric had come to the throne of the Ostrogothic kingdom in Moesia and Pannonia. Being on friendly terms with Zeno, he wrote him, stating that it was impossible for him to restrain his Goths within the impoverished province of Pannonia, and asking his permission to lead them to some more favorable region which they might conquer and posses. Zeno gave him permission to march against Odoacer and take possession of Italy. Accordingly, after a five years' war, the Herulian kingdom in Italy was overthrown, Odoacer was treacherously slain, and Theodoric established his Ostrogoths in the Italian peninsula. As already stated, he was an Arian, and the law of Odoacer subjecting the election of the pope to the approval of the king, was still retained.


Page 126
The following incident will show how completely the papacy was in subjection to his power. The Catholics in the East having begun a persecution against the Arians, A.D. 523, Theodoric summoned Pope John into his presence and thus addressed him: " 'If the emperor [Justin, the predecessor of Justinian] therefore does not think fit to revoke the edict which he has lately issued against those of my persuasion [that is, the Arians], it is my firm resolution to issue the like edict against those of his [that is, the Catholics]; and to see it everywhere executed with the same rigor. Those who do not profess the faith of Nice, are heretics to him, and those who do are heretics to me. Whatever can excuse or justify his severity to the former, will excuse and justify mine to the latter. But the emperor,' continued the king, 'has none about him who dare freely and openly speak what they think, or to whom he would hearken if they did. But the great veneration which he professes for your See , leaves no room to doubt but he would hearken to you. I will therefore have you to repair forthwith to Constantinople, and there to remonstrate, both in my name and your own, against the violent measures in which that court has so rashly engaged. It is in your power to divert the emperor from them; and till you have, nay, till the Catholics [this name Theodoric applies to the Arians] are restored to the free exercise of their religion, and to all the churches from which they have been driven, you must not think of returning to Italy.' " [16]


The pope who was thus peremptorily ordered by the Arian emperor not to set foot again upon Italian soil until he had carried out the will of the king, certainly could not hope for much advancement toward any kind of supremacy until that power was taken out of the way.


The feelings of the papal party toward Theodoric may be accurately estimated, according to a quotation already given, by the vengeance which they took on his memory. They tore from his tomb the vase in which his Arian subjects had en-


Page 127
shrined his ashes. These feelings are put into language by Baronius, who inveighs "against Theodoric as a cruel barbarian, as a barbarous tyrant, as an impious Arian." [17]


While the Catholics were thus feeling the restraining power of an Arian king in Italy, they were suffering a violent persecution from the Arian Vandals in Africa. [18] Elliot says: " The Vandal kings were not only Arians, but persecutors of the Catholics; in Sardinia and Corsica under the Roman Episcopate, we may presume, as well as in Africa." [19]


Such was the position of affairs, when, A.D. 533, Justinian entered upon his Vandal and Gothic wars. Wishing to obtain the influence of the pope and the Catholic party, he issued that memorable decree which was to constitute the pope of all the churches, and from the carrying out of which A.D. 538, the period of papal supremacy is to be dated. And whoever will read the history of the African campaign, 533-534, and the Italian campaign, 534-538, will notice that the Catholics everywhere hailed as deliverers the army of Belisarius, the general of Justinian.


But no decree of this nature could be carried into effect until the Arian horns which stood in its way were overthrown. A turn came, however, in the tide of affairs, for in the military campaign in Africa and Italy the victorious legions of Belisarius dealt a crushing blow to Arianism, so much so that its final supporters were vanquished.


Procopius relates that the African war was undertaken by Justinian for the relief of the Christians (Catholics) in that quarter, and that when he expressed his intention in this respect, the prefect of the palace came very near dissuading him from his purpose. But a dream appeared to him in which he was bidden "not to shrink from the execution of his design;


Page 128
for by assisting the Christians he would overthrow the power of the Vandals." [20]


Mosheim declares: "It is true, the Greeks who had received the decrees of the Council of Nice [that is, from the Catholics], persecuted and oppressed the Arians wherever their influence and authority could reach; but the Nicenians, in their turn, were not less rigorously treated by their adversaries [the Arians], particularly in Africa and Italy, where they felt, in a very severe manner, the weight of the Arian power, and the bitterness of their resentment. the triumphs of Arianism were, however, transitory; and its prosperous days were entirely eclipsed when the Vandals were driven out of Africa, and the Goths out of Italy, by the arms of Justinian." [21]


Elliot summarizes: "I might cite three that were eradicated from before the pope out of the list first given, viz., the Heruli under Odoacer, the Vandals, and the Ostrogoths." [22]


From the historical testimony above cited, we think it clearly established that the three horns plucked up were the powers named: the Heruli, A.D. 493, the Vandals, in 534, and the Ostrogoths finally in 553, though effective opposition by the latter to the decree of Justinian ceased when they were driven from Rome by Belisarius in 538, [23] as stated on page 127.


(Daniel and Revelation Uriah Smith) http://temcat.com/L-1-adv-pioneer-lib/USMITH/DANIEL%20AND%20THE%20REVELATION.pdf


Note- I do not agree with everything in this book but for the sheer historical data presented I wanted to include some of this. Go to the link and you can find the footnote sources and search out for yourself if need be at your library or where applicable on the internet. This is a study on Prophecy and prophecy is history fulfilled and unfulfilled. Where history has fulfilled the prophecies we must study the past and let it unfold for us by the grace of God.


This has been a very long study but by the grace of God it will be understood and we are going to study even more and that studying will show even more details that point to the Papacy as this Little Horn power. Many who call themselves enlightened want to refuse to believe. Many want to take these prophecies and make them point to many, many future events yet to take place. Satan stops at nothing to deceive. We cannot allow ourselves to fall to His deceptions, we must pray to God to not be deceived , to be among His elect that will not be overtaken by the awful power of the evil one.


Jesus prayed to the Father for us, asking that we NOT be taken out of this world but to be KEPT from evil. Please Lord, keep us from evil in all its forms!!!


Help us!


In the name of our Savior, our glorious, glorious Savior Jesus Christ. In His righteousness, through His forgiveness, by His grace and mercy, all through love!


AMEN!

Friday, June 17, 2011

Prophecy 7 Little Horn continued

A little bit from yesterday--


Seeing means comprehending, understanding, knowing.
This little horn with eyes of man would see as a man sees, would understand as a man understands. Would be like man, speaking like a man only this man would speak great things!
So while this little horn is a power to be reckoned with it is a like a man not a normal kingdom, surely this makes the little horn very, very special.
Remember it was able to uproot 3 normal kingdoms.
What sort of power can we even remotely imagine doing this during the history portrayed?
Rome mixing with others-
- iron mingling with clay -
while Rome is conquered and divided into many parts?


Dan 7:8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.


We're going to jump ahead a few verses now so we get an even clearer picture of things before we discuss the 'little horn' more.


Dan 7:15 I Daniel was grieved in my spirit in the midst of my body, and the visions of my head troubled me.
Dan 7:16 I came near unto one of them that stood by, and asked him the truth of all this. So he told me, and made me know the interpretation of the things.


We, like Daniel, need to understand, we need the TRUTH of ALL this. By the grace and mercy of our Savior may we comprehend as He would have us to. Let the Holy Spirit guide us into all truth, please Lord, please.


Dan 7:17 These great beasts, which are four, are four kings, which shall arise out of the earth.
Dan 7:18 But the saints of the most High shall take the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever.


Just like that statue! Gold, silver, brass and iron - that iron continues until the very end even in a mingled state. The saints of the most High will take kingdom that ALL these kings possessed, all the kingdoms represent what exactly? Place upon this earth! That's all any country represents in truth, a land, a part of earth. Caretakers of various parts of the earth… the North American, South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, Africa, Antarctica- all continents of the earth. On those continents men have fought to own parts of them, to govern them, to rule over them, to claim them as theirs. They've given them names and even today when through wars or diplomatic agreements land changes hands the names can be changed. A divided part of land- say the Sudan can suddenly become South Sudan and North Sudan and no longer be known as simple the Sudan. Names change, borders change, old names disappear only to reappear later at times, or never to appear again. Kings that have kingdoms encompassing many regions have their kingdoms taken from them and the kingdom becomes divided, or is joined to another kingdom. Babylon once conquered by the Medes and Persians didn't retain the exact same borders as before but what was once Babylon became part of the Medes and Persians. When Greece rose us and became a ruling kingdom in took in what was once Babylon and what once belonged to the Medes and Persians. Then when the Romans came in conquering they then took over what once had been claimed as Babylon, Medes-Persians, and Greece. The Romans went on and their borders extended even further than any imagined by Babylon. Throughout all this many of the names of the various locations throughout the regions remained the same- for example Jerusalem has remained Jerusalem, and in truth is one of the oldest cities in existence.


'The oldest part of the city was settled in the 4th millennium BCE, making Jerusalem one of the oldest cities in the world'

Pasted from


These great beasts in Daniel's prophecy we are told represent kings (kingdoms- interchangeably as noted before) which would rise up. Then after these kingdoms what happens? The saints of the MOST HIGH would take possession of the (SINGULAR) kingdom for ever and for ever and ever. After all is said and done in the very end God's chosen would be the possessors of the whole of earth, possessors of what others once held as theirs. It is incredibly important that we realize that we are being given a gift here when we are able to understand the plan God has for the earth, His earth, His creation! No, the world the way it exists today will NOT go on and on and on changing hands, merging or being divided over and over again into fewer or more kingdoms. It was NO mistake that we we've been allowed to know that there will be no other great one world power, no mistake at all. So many envision a one world power- even today they do. We've had many try to conquer country after country in order to be world conquerors. We've had World Wars- wars involving many countries in order to bring about the fact the world is divided and in no need of being controlling by one. When people talk today of a one world government they are NOT talking about giving up their individuality as countries conquered and ruled, owned by another. The Bible tells us this will not happen, can not happen.


Let's keep reading...


Dan 7:19 Then I would know the truth of the fourth beast, which was diverse from all the others, exceeding dreadful, whose teeth were of iron, and his nails of brass; which devoured, brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with his feet;
Dan 7:20 And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows.


The 'little horn' of the fourth beast- eyes, mouth speaking very great things, whose LOOK was MORE stout than his fellows.


This *little horn* had a LOOK that was more stout than the other horns. This little horn caused three of the *bigger horns* to fall before it, yet it wasn't like the other horns at all. It was …no…it's LOOK was more stout than the other horns even though it wasn't the same as the other horns. Have you ever seen a football team lined up? Not all players are the same size are they? In different positions you need players of different sizes right? The quarterback usually isn't anywhere near as big as say a line backer, yet that quarterback has the most prestige, the most power in the team. That quarterback though of a lesser stature as a rule, calls the important plays of the game. Everyone who knows football knows that to be the quarterback is to attain a coveted position. That little horn whose look was more stout, that little horn which came up and three bigger horns fell down in its wake was truly impressive without any of the normal characteristics of a great kingdom- a normal kingdom. This little horn stands out. Let's read more...


Dan 7:21 I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;
Dan 7:22 Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.


That little horn makes WAR with the SAINTS and prevails against the saints!
That little horn will continue until the saints possess the kingdom- until Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior returns!


Is it quite clear now that we're not dealing with any normal type of kingdom here? This isn't a normal power trying to rule here. This isn't the conquering kingdom overthrowing other kingdoms as before. This little horn power is unique in more than one way. Yet does history record any one kingdom such as this? Seriously. IS there any sort of little kingdom type power that has retained any sort of power over people, power they'll retain until our Savior returns.


Our Bible tells us that at least ten kingdoms will exist after Rome's slow demise.
Our Bible tells us that three of those ten will fall before a lesser kingdom with characteristics of a man- not a beast.
Our Bible tells us that this lesser man-like kingdom will be powerful enough to make war against God's chosen people, those who will inherit His kingdom once all the other powers, the feet are crushed beneath the weight and power of our Savior's return.
This powerful little horn must still exist right now! We have to let history speak to us, we are given the keys to the prophecy and we must let the prophecy speak to us as it has unfolded to do otherwise- to try and make prophecy of none effect- of ever being future hold no past would be to deny God's desire to do nothing lest He tell His prophets.


Amo 3:7 Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.


Reading on to catch even more of this picture of the little horn--


Dan 7:23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.


The Roman rule was truly unlike any other rulership before it and it did go on to conquer more than all the other- bringing under its dominion many, many people. We've have plenty of movies that have included Romans in all their awful power and glory. It was under the Roman rule that our Savior was born! So to say that the fourth kingdom would be different than others, that it would devour the whole earth, that it shall tread it down and break it into pieces isn't terribly farfetched at all.


'Ancient Rome has contributed greatly to the development of law, war, art, literature, architecture, technology and language in the Western world, and its history continues to have a major influence on the world today.'

Pasted from


Its history CONTINUES to have a major influence on the world today!!!


Dan 7:24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.


Out of Rome came ten influential kingdoms - Rome was NOT conquered by another ONE ruling kingdom! Rome fell to MANY, not to ONE dominating force. Where as Babylon was conquered by the Medes and Persians, and the Medes and Persians were conquered by Greece, and Greece conquered by the Romans, the Romans were NOT conquered by one…. this is so very important to understand, maybe that's why we are being told it over and over again in different ways so that we will understand.


Ten influential kingdoms formed and then a strange, different, man-like kingdom rose up subduing three of those ten kingdoms. Subduing-- this power was going to be influential in the overthrow of three of the kingdoms that Rome fell victim to.


Dan 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.


This little horn, little strange man-like kingdom, different from all the other kingdoms would speak great words AGAINST the MOST HIGH! This little horn would wear out that saints of the MOST HIGH. This little horn would THINK to CHANGE TIMES AND LAWS! This little horn would rule with power for a time and times and a dividing of times (MORE ON THIS LATER).


Dan 7:26 But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end.


Eventually this power that had such great control over the saints for so long but no longer will face judgment. Eventually this power will have his dominion taken and it will be consumed, destroyed in the end.


Dan 7:27 And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him.


God's kingdom will prevail over this little horn power!


We need to look at our history and find out beyond a doubt what this little horn power is. It has existed for a long, long, long time and will continue to exist until the very end.


More tomorrow God willing.


By the grace of God we will have understanding that will leave no room for doubt, none at all. So many people doubt today. So many people wish to confuse what can be understood by putting their own meaning to things that are clearly seen.


Having eyes people refuse to see!
Having ears people refuse to hear!


Mat 13:14 And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
Mat 13:15 For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.


Oh, I pray to God we are never like this, never! Please Lord let us see! Please Lord let us hear! Please Lord let us understand with our hearts, let us be converted, HEAL US LORD!


Let us not claim to be rich and in need of nothing.


Rev 3:17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:
Rev 3:18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.


By Your love and grace, Your mercy, Your forgiveness, Your righteousness! Let us buy of You gold tried in fire, white raiment, and eyesalve!


Amen.

Prophecy 6 Little Horn

We're going to pick up in the same place as yesterday to recap for a moment.


Dan 7:7 After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.


We've been discussing the relationship between Daniel 2 and Daniel 7- the similarities in the message. It's very easy to see that the Statue and the Beasts are symbolizing much the same thing. The Beasts are adding more detail to the overall picture and it's serving to clarify God's message to us.


When Daniel wrote the first prophecy He knew what time they were living in and said as much-


Dan 2:38 ... Thou art this head of gold.
Dan 2:39 And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth.


Daniel knew he was living in the time of the head of gold and yet he also knew that after him there would be other kingdoms. Because no one knows the day nor the hour of Christ's return we cannot place a date on the appearance of that stone Daniel mentions.


Dan 2:44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever.
Dan 2:45 Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold…


We don't know when the stone will come to destroy all the worldly kingdoms, we don't know when the kingdom that was set up for us will be realized. What we do know is that as sure as these prophecies have come true the kingdom of God will be fully realized.


Yesterday we talked about the ten toes and ten horns. We are living in the time of the ten toes and ten horns and by that I mean there is NO other kingdom left to come but the kingdom of God.


Our world will never again be dominated by any one world power, not ever. Even if there is a common leader for world peace one day that brings the leaders of many countries together to work for peace, there will still be many other countries and NEVER a single country, never a single country to rule all. You could never get any of the major world countries today to agree to any other country ruling them, never. The United States would never all Russia or China to take control of them, never and vice versa.


Let's continue on here and learn more of what the Bible has to say about the horns…


Dan 7:8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.


So the ten major conquering people that sprang up taking control over what was once the great kingdom of Rome weren't left alone but… ANOTHER horn would come up among them, a *little* horn. Something that is very notable and we need to really pay attention to is that three of the first horns were going to be plucked up by the roots when this little horn came up. For being a *little* horn it's really something that three of the other horns not classified as little would be plucked up by the roots. When you pluck something up by the roots what are you doing? Destroying it completely, right? If you don't pluck something up by the roots it still has a chance to grow again. You know what they say about weeds right? Make sure you get all the roots up or else. And that or else is the return of those weeds. When these three kingdoms were plucked up by the roots that means they were destroyed completely NEVER to become kingdoms again. Never to continue on in history as a people, as a place, but totally destroyed and kept from flourishing.


Three of the ten kingdoms…


Heruli-

After this kingdom was destroyed by the Langobards, Herulian fortunes waned. Remaining Heruls joined the Langobards and moved to Lombardia, today Italy, and some of them sought refuge with the Gepids. Marcellinus comes recorded that the Romans (meaning the East Romans or in modern naming the Byzantines) allowed them to resettle depopulated "lands and cities" near Singidunum (modern Belgrade); this was done "by order of Anastasius Caesar" sometime between June 29 and August 31, 512. After one generation, this minor federate kingdom disappeared from the historical records.

Pasted from



Vandals-

In the words of historian Roger Collins: "The remaining Vandals were then shipped back to Constantinople to be absorbed into the imperial army. As a distinct ethnic unit they disappeared".

Pasted from


Ostrogoths-

With that final defeat, the remaining Ostrogoths went back north and (re)settled in south Austria. The Ostrogothic name wholly died... The nation had practically evaporated with Theodoric's death.

Pasted from


This can be said of NO other of the ten conquering kingdoms. None of them disappeared from historical records, none of them as a distinct ethnic unit disappeared, and the names of them all did not wholly die such as these. Of these three horns plucked up the *little horn* played a part in their demise in some manner. What *little* power was suddenly worth reckoning with that hadn't been a power previously- and it wasn't a regular kingdom like the others. If this *little horn* was like the others wouldn't it just have been another horn? Seriously.


Dan 7:8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.


A little horn. In this little horn were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking great things.


Eyes like a man.
A mouth speaking great things.


We know the previous beasts had characteristics we could note and it gave us much more detail on the kingdoms. But the other horns of the fourth beast did not possess extra characteristics, only this little horn, this strange little horn with eyes and a mouth.


Eyes of a man… not eyes of an animal, not eyes of an eagle, not eyes of an owl, not eyes of a hawk but eyes of a man. And a mouth that speaks, not a mouth of a lion roaring or devouring, but a mouth that speaks great things.


Eyes obviously represent sight and when we see things it's with a certain comprehension.


Rev 3:18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.


Anoint thine eyes with eyesalve that thou may see!
We need to see! We need the Holy Spirit's guidance to see.
Seeing means comprehending, understanding, knowing. This little horn with eyes of man would see as a man sees, would understand as a man understands. Would be like man, speaking like a man only this man would speak great things! So while this little horn is a power to be reckoned with it is a like a man not a normal kingdom, surely this makes the little horn very, very special. Remember it was able to uproot 3 normal kingdoms. What sort of power can we even remotely imagine doing this during the history portrayed? Rome mixing with others, iron mingling with clay while Rome is conquered and divided into many parts?


Because this is such a unique and important part of our history I'm going to pause here and pick it up tomorrow, by the grace and will of God.


We need eyes to see, we need the eyesalve on our eyes and by the Lord's mercy we will have this as we continue to study prophecy.


In His amazing LOVE!


Amen.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Prophecy - 5 Fourth Beast, dreadful and terrible...

The next verse in Daniel 7 is--


Dan 7:7 After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.


A fourth beast- a fourth kingdom. This beast is dreadful, terrible, exceedingly strong with great iron teeth. This beast devoured and broke things into piece, stamping what was left with it's feet. This beast was different from all the other beasts before it, and this beast had ten horns.


There is very little doubt that the Roman Empire was powerful and strong, a conquering kingdom, that conquered Greece toppling it from its position as a major ruling kingdom.


Let's take a few moments to read some Roman history--


By the 3rd century BC, Rome had become the pre-eminent city of the Italian peninsula, having conquered and defeated the Sabines, the Etruscans, the Samnites and most of the Greek colonies in Sicily, Campania and Southern Italy in general. During the Punic Wars between Rome and the great Mediterranean empire of Carthage, Rome's stature increased further as it became the capital of an overseas empire for the first time. Beginning in the 2nd century BC, Rome went through a significant population expansion as Italian farmers, driven from their ancestral farmlands by the advent of massive, slave-operated farms called latifundia, flocked to the city in great numbers. The victory over Carthage in the First Punic War brought the first two provinces outside the Italian peninsula, Sicily and Sardinia. Parts of Spain (Hispania) followed, and in the beginning of the 2nd century the Romans got involved in the affairs of the Greek world. By then all Hellenistic kingdoms and the Greek city-states were in decline, exhausted from endless civil wars and relying on mercenary troops. This saw the fall of Greece after the Battle of Corinth (146 BC) and the establishment of Roman control over Greece.[15]


Roman dominance expanded over most of Western Europe and the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, though its influence through client states and the sheer power of its presence was wider than its formal borders. Its population surpassed one million inhabitants.[22] For almost a thousand years, Rome was the most politically important, richest, and largest city in the Western world.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rome


*


Clearly Rome took over as being this territory's central figure and remained so for many years.


Remember how the iron of Rome moved down to mingle with the clay in the feet and toes of the Daniel chapter 2 statue? The toes are the last kingdoms before the statue is destroyed and Rome is still in existence in those toes.


Does Rome still exist in our modern world? Undeniably, yes, Rome still exists. Is there a kingdom-like power in Rome? Does Rome have anything noteworthy today? Where is the Vatican? In Rome.


The fact the iron would co-exist with the clay is still true today and will be true until Christ returns. Too many wish to make those toes solid- reflecting no mingling at all. Too many are hoping for a one world government, a one world kingdom, too many believe that this might be possible and what I have to say to them is this… NEVER will the various countries, the various super powers give up that power and allow another to rule, not in truth. It'd be easy for...let's say the EU- the European Union to try and lead by example- but those countries that make up the EU have NOT given up their individual power. Those countries retain their individual status- they are NOT all in agreement under one ruler. There will NEVER come a time when say… France will agree to give up its name entirely and adopt the sole name of EU merging with other countries giving up their individual names.


Prophecy tells us that the many countries we are separated into today will for the most part remain separated. That's not to say there won't be some that join here and there but there will never be a kingdom such as Ancient Rome to rule over so many again, not in the land where God brought His chosen people- that is still a factor here and we can't overlook it.


Having said all that- history shows this--


There were ten nations at some time in their history that were most important in bringing the Roman Empire to it's knees, who as independent kingdoms held portions of the Roman empire as theirs.


Huns, Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Franks, Vandals, Suevi, Burgundians, Heruli, Anglo-Saxons, and Lombards.


Let's take a few moments to touch on each of these and then if you're so inclined you can read further by going to the various links or searching for information on the internet as you desire. Before you skip over all this as not being interesting ask yourself if perhaps taking a bit of time to correlate history to God's prophecies isn't worth it. We NEED to do this. We need to study God's word. When God gave us His prophecies it was for a reason and not just for those who lived during the time the prophecies were given. Remember this…


Dan 12:4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.


I don't know about you but I know there is a point in history when we went from the thousands and thousands of years with horses as our main source of transportation to suddenly riding in trains, cars, airplanes… and it was SUDDENLY when you think of how many thousands of years we were in the dark where modern technology is concerned. Knowledge shall be increased, and it WAS increased and hasn't stopped increasing rapidly, by leaps and bound. Just think for a moment where we were fifty years ago… a hundred years ago and look where we are now. And you know what, back in the mid 1800's when all this started Biblical knowledge was increasing by leaps and bounds as well for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.


So when we really understand that prophecy sealed up is unsealed and there for our understanding we NEED to take the time to really understand as much of it as we can and by the grace and mercy of our Savior we will understand all we need to understand, all that He wants us to understand.


Let's take a bit of time here and read these little excerpts that merely place these ten nations pitted against Rome. For a much fuller understanding please, please take all the time you can to study more on your own.


1 Huns and Rome-


Called the Scourge of God by the Romans, Attila the Hun was king and general of the Hun empire from A.D. 433 to 453.

Pasted from


2 Ostrogoth and Rome-


The First Siege of Rome during the Gothic War lasted for a year and nine days, from 2 March 537 to 12 March 538.[1] It was fought between the defending East Romans, under general Belisarius, and the Ostrogothic army under king Vitiges. The siege was the first major encounter between the forces of the two opponents, and played a decisive role in the subsequent development of the war.

Pasted from


3 Visigoths and Rome-


In 401 Alaric began his attacks on Italy; he was halted by Stilicho, but after Stilicho's death he succeeded in his invasion, and the Visigoths became masters of Italy. Negotiations between Alaric and Emperor Honorius failed, and in 410 the Visigoths sacked Rome. Alaric died soon afterward.

Pasted from


4 Franks and Rome-


What distinguished the Frankish kingdom was not the height of its culture. Clovis was no Theodoric, and his capital city of Paris was no Ravenna . The Franks were creating a new people whose culture would be a genuine fusion of Roman and Germanic elements

Pasted from


5 Vandals and Rome-


The Vandals were an East Germanic tribe that entered the late Roman Empire during the 5th century, perhaps best known for their sack of Rome in 455.

Pasted from


6 Suevi and Rome-


411 The Vandals, Suevi and Alans partition the Iberian Peninsula among themselves, only the northern part remain under Roman rule.

Pasted from


7 Burgundians and Rome-


Six major German tribes, the Visigoths, the Ostrogoths, the Vandals, the Burgundians, the Lombards, and the Franks participated in the fragmentation and the collapse of the Western Roman Empire.

Pasted from


8 Heruli and Rome-


The Heruli (spelled variously in Latin and Greek) were an East Germanic tribe from Scandinavia. They raided towns in the Roman Empire, captured Byzantium in 267 AD and sacked several Greek cities.

Pasted from


9 Anglo-Saxons and Rome -


Whereas in France , the original Romanized inhabitants vastly outnumbered the invading Franks, in England the Germanic invaders, the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes from northern Germany and Denmark , drove most of the original Celtic inhabitants to Cornwall , Wales , and Scotland in the far western regions of the British Isles . The invaders, whom for convenience we call the Anglo-Saxons, ignored most of the Roman achievements they found. They disliked the land already being farmed, which was mostly light chalky soil on the hilltops, and preferred the clay lands of the river valleys. They paid no attention to Roman law, but introduced a wholly Germanic tribal system of government. They arrived as pagans, and were converted only at the end of the sixth century by St. Augustine 's mission sent directly from Rome . The Anglo-Saxons thus received what Romanization they had from the Catholic Church. From the Roman Empire itself, they acquired only the roads. By contrast even with Clovis 's Paris , life in Anglo-Saxon England was rough, drab, and dangerous.

Under the impact of these Germanic invaders, the control of the Roman Empire in Western Europe disappeared. The last emperor in the West was the boy ruler Romulus Augustulus, who was killed in 476 by the Germanic chieftain Odoacer. Odoacer however did not declare that he had put an end to the Roman Empire in the West. He sent the insignia of the emperor back to Constantinople with the message that the empire needed only one emperor, and that he would act as the representative of Constantinople in Italy . Odoacer felt, in short, that he had reunited the Roman Empire . However, the Roman Empire in the West had fallen. Britain , France , the Low Countries , Spain , north Africa, and Italy itself were all in the hands of Ger- manic invaders, whether or not those invaders paid lip service to the emperor in faraway Constantinople

Pasted from


10 Lombards and Rome-


At this time, the Lombards, who were experiencing a revival, invaded and razed the Roman countryside. There was little the pope could do against the Lombards, who had become allies of Byzantium

Pasted from


*

This is enough for now, it's a lot to take in, but so worth it to help gain a clearer understanding of the prophecies given to us by God to understand and know what will come to pass and what has come to pass. There is no doubt that God's word is true- prophecy alone proves that beyond any question whatsoever.


In His amazing Love!!! By His will!


Amen.