Thursday, May 19, 2016

Almost a whole city came out to hear the Word of God spoken by Paul

Act 13:44  And the next sabbath day came almost the whole city together to hear the word of God.

Almost a whole city came out to hear Paul preach and teach the Word of God!

Why?

Why was it important then and not now?

Do we need less saving now than those back then?

So we who are living today need to hear the Word of God less than those who came out to hear Paul? This isn't truth, this isn't right at all.

Every single human being needs the Word of God.  Every single one of us needs to 'come out to hear the word of God.'

So why aren't more of us doing this?

Why do we refuse to present ourselves to God, to listen to Him, to learn from Him?

Almost a whole city together wanted to hear the Word of God. 

Remember this--

Rev 1:3  Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time is at hand.

That doesn't say- blessed are those who read and hear the prophecy and keep them- but only if you are alive in the days of the apostles.  

ALL who read and hear, and keep the prophecy are BLESSED, yet so few truly desire to be blessed this way.

May God help all who are reading this, may God bless all who are hearing, reading, and keeping the things they read in this prophecy. Please God, help us as we continue to delve into the prophecies You have given to us in Daniel, which ties in with the prophecy of Revelation. Please…please.

All in the name of our Savior Jesus Christ our Lord, now and forever!

AMEN.

******* Continuing our prophecy study--  Please GO back and read the study from the beginning to gain full understanding of where we are if you haven't been following this study daily.  Thank you :)  God bless you! ******

History-Prophecy.

As we continue on we need to look at the continuing history of Christianity.  Missionaries eventually would go to all the world, but closer to the declining Roman Empire -as wars were renewed and the gradual disintegration of that empire was underway- we have an invading force that were once known for their barbarianism.  This group of people were the Goths.

'Ulfilas, or Gothic Wulfila (also Ulphilas. Orphila)[1] (ca. 310 – 383;[2]), bishop, missionary, and Bible translator, was a Goth or half-Goth and half-Greek from Cappadocia who had spent time inside the Roman Empire at the peak of the Arian controversy.
Ulfilas was ordained a bishop by Eusebius of Nicomedia and returned to his people to work as a missionary. In 348, to escape religious persecution by a Gothic chief, probably Athanaric[3] he obtained permission from Constantius II to migrate with his flock of converts to Moesia and settle near Nicopolis ad Istrum, in what is now northern Bulgaria. There, Ulfilas translated the Bible from Greek into the Gothic language. For this he devised the Gothic alphabet.[4] Fragments of his translation have survived, notably the Codex Argenteus held since 1648 in the University Library of Uppsala in Sweden. A parchment page of this Bible was found in 1971 in the Speyer Cathedral.[5]
His parents were of non-Gothic Anatolian origin but had been enslaved by Goths on horseback. Ulfilas converted many among the Goths, preaching an Arian Christianity, which, when they reached the western Mediterranean, set them apart from their Orthodox neighbors and subjects.



Read this…about the Goths invasion of the Roman Empire--

'In the first place, it was a great thing for Europe that when the Goths poured over Italy and even captured Rome they came as a Christian people, reverencing and sparing the churches, and
abstaining from those barbarities that accompanied the invasion of Britain by the heathen Saxons. But, in the second place, many of these simple Gothic Christians learned to their surprise that they were heretics, and that only when their efforts toward fraternizing with their fellow Christians in the orthodox Church were angrily resented.11'



Let's look a little bit at the council of Nicea too - 

'The First Council of Nicaea was a council of Christian bishops convened in Nicaea in Bithynia (present-day Iznik in Turkey) by the Roman Emperor Constantine I in A.D. 325. The Council was the first effort to attain consensus in the church through an assembly representing all of Christendom.[2]
Its main accomplishments were settlement of the Christological issue of the relationship of Jesus to God the Father; the construction of the first part of the Nicene Creed; settling the calculation of the date of Easter; and promulgation of early canon law.[3][4]'


This is why the invading Christian Goths later on were considered Heretics, they were of differing Christian beliefs than the ruling class in Roman.

The differing confrontations to come, the many, many battles that would end up dividing the Roman Empire eventually into ten main kingdoms for a time before three would be 'plucked up'…

  (Dan 7:8  I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things. )

...would be political and religious rather than strictly political- a BIG change from past battles.

This next verse--

Dan 11:30  'For the ships of Chittim shall come against him…'

Could only refer to this man and his amazing naval forces.

'The Vandals had suffered greatly from attacks from the more numerous Visigoths, and not long after taking power, Genseric decided to leave Hispania to this rival Germanic tribe. In fact, he seems to have started building a Vandal fleet even before he became king.

Taking advantage of a dispute between Boniface, Roman governor of North Africa, and the Roman government, Genseric ferried all 80,000 of his people across to Africa in 429. Once there, he won many battles over the weak and divided Roman defenders and quickly overran the territory now comprising modern Morocco and northern Algeria. His Vandal army laid siege to the city of Hippo Regius (where Augustine had recently been bishop — he died during the siege), taking it after 14 months of bitter fighting. The next year, Roman Emperor Valentinian III recognized Genseric as king of the lands he and his men had conquered.

In 439, after casting a covetous eye on the great city of Carthage for a decade, he took the city, apparently without any fighting. The Romans were caught unaware, and Genseric captured a large part of the western Roman navy docked in the port of Carthage. The Catholic bishop of the city, Quodvultdeus, was exiled to Naples, since Genseric demanded that all his close advisors follow the Arian form of Christianity. Nevertheless, Genseric gave freedom of religion to the Catholics, while insisting that the regime's elite follow Arianism. The common folk had low taxes under his reign, as most of the tax pressure was on the rich Roman families and the Catholic clergy.

Added to his own burgeoning fleet, the Kingdom of the Vandals now threatened the Empire for mastery of the western Mediterranean Sea. Carthage, meanwhile, became the new Vandal capital and an enemy of Rome for the first time since the Punic Wars.

With the help of their fleet, the Vandals soon subdued Sicily, Sardinia, Corsica and the Balearic Islands. Genseric strengthened the Vandal defenses and fleet and regulated the positions of Arians and Catholics. In 442, the Romans acknowledged the Carthaginian conquests, and recognized the Vandal kingdom as an independent country rather than subsidiary to Roman rule. The area in Algeria that had remained for the larger part independent of the Vandals turned from a Roman province into an ally.

For the next 30 years, Genseric and his soldiers sailed up and down the Mediterranean, living as pirates and raiders. One legend has it that Genseric was unable to vault upon a horse because of a fall he had taken as a young man; so he assuaged his desire for military glory on the sea.

In 468, Genseric's kingdom was the target of the last concerted effort by the two halves of the Roman Empire. They wished to subdue the Vandals and end their pirate raids. Genseric, against long odds, defeated the eastern Roman fleet commanded by Basiliscus off Cap Bon. It has been reported that the total invasion force on the fleet of 1,100 ships, counted 100,000 soldiers. Genseric sent a fleet of 500 Vandal ships against the Romans, losing 340 ships in the first engagement, but succeeded in destroying 600 Roman ships in the second. The Romans abandoned the campaign and Genseric remained master of the western Mediterranean until his death, ruling from the Strait of Gibraltar all the way to Tripolitania.


AMAZING! The victory of this man of the sea!  This verse of prophecy- Dan 11:30  'For the ships of Chittim shall come against him…' is truly fulfilled in this!

The Roman Empire was fighting for its survival and failing.

We'll continue with the 30th verse tomorrow… little by little, all by the GRACE OF GOD!!!!!!!

In His amazing LOVE!

Amen.

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Prophecy is Truth

Do we dare seek truth if it puts our beloved beliefs in danger?  We have them, we have cherished beliefs, ideas and faiths we cling to refusing to give them up. Yet, what if they are wrong?


Mat 15:1  Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
Mat 15:2  Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
Mat 15:3  But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?
Mat 15:4  For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.
Mat 15:5  But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me;
Mat 15:6  And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.
Mat 15:7  Ye hypocrites, well did Esaias prophesy of you, saying,
Mat 15:8  This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.
Mat 15:9  But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.

Did the scribes and Pharisees believe they were wrong? NO. They were God's chosen and they couldn't be wrong in things pertaining to God.

2Ti 4:3  For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
2Ti 4:4  And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

THEY WILL NOT ENDURE SOUND DOCTRINE.
Their lusts will cause them to choose teachers who will tell them what they want to hear, and that will not be TRUTH!

1Ti_4:7  But refuse profane and old wives' fables, and exercise thyself rather unto godliness.

We are to refuse PROFANE and OLD WIVES'  FABLES, and yet we embrace them!

Seek TRUTH. Pray and seek truth, please. God help us seek truth and only truth, please! We are so frail, our flesh nature so weak, save us from ourselves! Please, Father, please.  By the grace and mercy of our Savior, Jesus Christ may we know and believe only in the truth!


******* Continuing our prophecy study--  Please GO back and read the study from the beginning to gain full understanding of where we are if you haven't been following this study daily.  Thank you :)  God bless you! ******

Let's pick up where we left off yesterday.  We need to touch on a few more points before continuing on past Dan. 11:29.


Dan 11:29  At the time appointed he shall return, and come toward the south; but it shall not be as the former, or as the latter.


The whole landscape of the fighting, the disputes, the confrontations, the battles that were being arranged, fought, lost and won had a new element once Christianity filtered into everything.  There was a decisive rift between various groups of Christians as time went on, each claiming to have the *real* truth of the matter in things of God.


In the Eastern part of the Roman Empire- Constantinople, Alexandria, and Antioch-  There were questions over who was in charge of things.

'Patriarch of Antioch is a traditional title held by the Bishop of Antioch. As the traditional "overseer" episkopos, from which the word 'bishop' is derived) of the first gentile Christian community, the position has been of prime importance in the church from its earliest period…

According to church tradition, this ancient Patriarchate was founded by the Apostle Saint Peter. The patriarchal succession was disputed at the time of the Meletian schism in 362 and again after the Council of Chalcedon in 451, when there were rival Melkite and non-Chalcedonian claimants to the see.'

Pasted from  


In the Western part of the Roman Empire- Rome- there was NO question who was in charge.  The Bishop of Rome.

'The Pope ... is the Bishop of Rome, a position that makes him the leader of the worldwide Catholic Church (which is composed of the Latin Rite and the Eastern Catholic Churches in full communion with the see of Rome). The current office-holder is Pope Benedict XVI, who was elected in a papal conclave on 19 April 2005.[nb 1]

The office of the pope is known as the Papacy. His ecclesiastical jurisdiction is often called the "Holy See" (Sancta Sedes in Latin), or the "Apostolic See" based upon the Church tradition that the Apostles Saint Peter and Saint Paul were martyred in Rome.

 The pope is also head of state of Vatican City State,[3] a sovereign city-state entirely enclaved within the city of Rome.


Early popes helped to spread Christianity and resolve doctrinal disputes.[4] After the conversion of the rulers of the Roman Empire (the conversion of the populace was already advanced even before the Edict of Milan, 313), the Roman emperors became the popes' secular allies until the 8th century when Pope Stephen II was forced to appeal to the Franks for help,[5] beginning a period of close interaction with the rulers of the west. For centuries, the Donation of Constantine, later proved to be a forgery, provided support for the papacy's claim of political supremacy over the entire former Western Roman Empire. In medieval times, popes played powerful roles in Western Europe, often struggling with monarchs for control over the wide-ranging affairs of Church and state,[4] crowning emperors (Charlemagne was the first emperor crowned by a pope), and regulating disputes among secular rulers.[6]


Gradually forced to give up temporal power, popes now focus almost exclusively on religious matters.[4] Over the centuries, papal claims of spiritual authority have been ever more clearly expressed, culminating in 1870 with the proclamation of the dogma of papal infallibility for rare occasions when the pope speaks ex cathedra (literally "from the chair (of St. Peter)") to issue a formal definition of faith or morals.[4] The first (after the proclamation) and so far the last such occasion was in 1950, with the definition of the dogma of the Assumption of Mary.'

Pasted from  

Now another point that needs to be noted- that date 330AD- that appointed time, that date for us to notice.


After 330AD No emperor had his empire based out of Rome!  Who had official residence there instead? As the secular left going to Constantinople, who was left to take over Rome? The Bishop of Rome, and aside from what would be a few hiccups here and there over the course of the ages, the Bishop of Rome has never permanently left Rome. Where is the Papacy today?  Rome.  Again the pride that the Roman Catholic Church has in its 2000 year history is well known. That our God saw fit to give us prophecy to point out all this is just so amazing!


Remember this point?

• May 11 – Emperor Constantine the Great dedicates Constantinople, or Nova Roma (modern Istanbul), and moves the capital of the Roman Empire there from Rome. He has spent 4 years building the city on the site of ancient Byzantium; having chosen the site for its strategic location (a seaport with easy access to Anatolia and the Danube).

Pasted from  


The capital of the Roman Empire MOVED after 300 plus years!  330 years from the First established ruler of the Roman Empire.   This is just so wondrous, being able to see the hand of God working through prophecy, working through history, just overwhelmingly wonderful.


Here's a quotation worth noting--


'Thus the presence of Constantine in Rome redounded to the importance and dignity of the bishopric of
Rome, but it was not until Constantine had moved his capital to Constantinople, that the way was
opened for the full play of that arrogant spirit that has ever been the chief characteristic of that
dignitary. "The absence of a secular competitor allowed the papal authority to grow up and to develop
its secret strength" Milman);2 and under the blandishments of necessitous imperial favor he did as he
pleased, and more rapidly than ever his power grew.'

http://www.whitehorsemedia.com/docs/THE_TWO_REPUBLICS.pdf


We've already noted in the wiki quote earlier in this study that the Papal Roman power grew in the Western Roman Empire. This isn't coincidence, but rather the truth predicted by God for what must come to pass in our world. Such fascinating studying!


*******

This is a shorter study than usual, but we need to really take our time and let the Lord guide us as we undertake such amazing truth.


More tomorrow by the grace of our Lord and Savior!  Through His LOVE always!!!


Amen.

Monday, May 16, 2016

Jesus Expounded on Prophecy


By the end of our Daniel study we will be in our time. We will be up -to- date and waiting for the last events to take place.  Because a DAY is as a THOUSAND YEARS with God and because He is LONGSUFFERING not wanting any to be lost, we don't know when the end will take place. We are not meant to know the day or the hour.  We who are alive when Christ returns know that we have to watch the signs given to us, and be ready, we have to pray.  How long we wait, how long between the last given prophecy - our Savior's return, we don't know, we just don't. Not knowing all the answer is no excuse not to study all we can know, all that we do know.  To see history fulfilling prophecy  time and time again gives us affirmation that we need!  Jesus expounded on ALL the prophecies in the SCRIPTURES ( the Old Testaments) concerning Himself and He did that for a reason. Prophecy revealed Him to those He expounded to and prophecy reveals so much more to us.

We are blessed by reading and keeping prophecy, please Lord, bless us as we continue to study the prophecy that you have given to us.

******* Continuing our prophecy study--  Please GO back and read the study from the beginning to gain full understanding of where we are if you haven't been following this study daily.  Thank you :)  God bless you! *******


Dan 11:29  At the time appointed he shall return, and come toward the south; but it shall not be as the former, or as the latter.


Remember how that Little Horn came up *diverse* from the others?  It was a different sort of kingdom wasn't it? A religious/political power, not solely a political power. Now here we have the King of the North coming towards the King of the South- but it wasn't going to be as it had been before, and not just as it was the last time. So we have to ask ourselves why wasn't it as it was before? History reveals that IF that appointed time spoken of is the *Dan. 11:24 '...even for a time.' * then the momentous events occurring in 330AD were what? We took a quick glance at them yesterday.

• May 11 – Emperor Constantine the Great dedicates Constantinople, or Nova Roma (modern Istanbul), and moves the capital of the Roman Empire there from Rome. He has spent 4 years building the city on the site of ancient Byzantium; having chosen the site for its strategic location (a seaport with easy access to Anatolia and the Danube).
Pasted from  


Constantine the Great.  Constantine was the emperor who did what? He was...

'Well known for being the first Roman emperor to convert to Christianity'
Pasted from  



Again, RELIGION! A religious power is coming into play, not strictly political!


This religious power combined with politics was divided-  N/W verses S/E .


The First Council of Nicea was convened by Constantine I upon the recommendations of a synod led by Hosius of Córdoba in the Eastertide of 325. This synod had been charged with investigation of the trouble brought about by the Arian controversy in the Greek-speaking east.[10] To most bishops, the teachings of Arius were heretical and dangerous to the salvation of souls. In the summer of 325, the bishops of all provinces were summoned to Nicea (now known as Iznik, in modern-day Turkey), a place easily accessible to the majority of delegates, particularly those of Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine, Egypt, Greece, and Thrace.

This was the first general council in the history of the Church since the Apostolic Council of Jerusalem, the Apostolic council having established the conditions upon which Gentiles could join the Church.[11] In the Council of Nicea, "the Church had taken her first great step to define doctrine more precisely in response to a challenge from a heretical theology."[12]

Pasted from  


Christians holding different beliefs.


'Athanasius of Alexandria [b. ca. (296-298) – d. 2 May 373] -  He was the 20th bishop of Alexandria.[1] His long episcopate lasted 45 years (c. 8 June 328 - 2 May 373), of which over 17 years were spent in five exiles ordered by four different Roman emperors. He is considered to be a renowned Christian theologian, a Church Father, the chief defender of Orthodoxy against Arianism, and a noted Egyptian leader of the fourth century.

He is remembered for his role in the conflict with Arius and Arianism. In 325, at the age of 27, Athanasius had a leading role against the Arians in the First Council of Nicaea. At the time, he was a deacon and personal secretary of the 19th Bishop of Alexandria, Alexander. Nicaea was convoked by the Emperor Constantine in May–August 325 to address the Arian heresy that Christ is of a distinct substance from the Father.'

Pasted from  

*

'Arianism is the theological teaching attributed to Arius (ca. AD 250–336), a Christian presbyter from Alexandria, Egypt, concerning the relationship of the entities of the Trinity ('God the Father', 'God the Son' and 'God the Holy Spirit') and the precise nature of the Son of God as being a subordinate entity to God the Father.

 Deemed a heretic by the First Council of Nicaea of 325, Arius was later exonerated in 335 at the First Synod of Tyre,[1] and then, after his death, pronounced a heretic again at the First Council of Constantinople of 381.[2]

The Roman Emperors Constantius II (337–361) and Valens (364–378) were Arians or Semi-Arians. The Arian concept of Christ is that the Son of God did not always exist, but was created by—and is therefore distinct from and inferior to—God the Father. This belief is grounded in the Gospel of John passage “You heard me say, ‘I am going away and I am coming back to you.’ If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I." (verse 14:28)[3]

Arianism is defined as those teachings attributed to Arius which are in opposition to mainstream Trinitarian Christological doctrine, as determined by the first two Ecumenical Councils and currently maintained by the Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Churches and most Reformation Protestant Churches. "Arianism" is also often used to refer to other nontrinitarian theological systems of the 4th century, which regarded Jesus Christ—the Son of God, the Logos—as either a created being (as in Arianism proper and Anomoeanism), or as neither uncreated nor created in the sense other beings are created (as in Semi-Arianism).'

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arianism


We need to remember how the first church was viewed-  seriously, let's take a look at things. How did Jesus intend His church to be?

There would be elders-


Act 11:29  Then the disciples, every man according to his ability, determined to send relief unto the brethren which dwelt in Judaea:
Act 11:30  Which also they did, and sent it to the elders by the hands of Barnabas and Saul.


Act 14:20  Howbeit, as the disciples stood round about him, he rose up, and came into the city: and the next day he departed with Barnabas to Derbe.
Act 14:21  And when they had preached the gospel to that city, and had taught many, they returned again to Lystra, and to Iconium, and Antioch,
Act 14:22  Confirming the souls of the disciples, and exhorting them to continue in the faith, and that we must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God.
Act 14:23  And when they had ordained them elders in every church, and had prayed with fasting, they commended them to the Lord, on whom they believed.


Act 15:2  When therefore Paul and Barnabas had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem unto the apostles and elders about this question.


What is an elder--

pres-boo'-ter-os
Comparative of πρέσβυς presbus (elderly); older; as noun, a senior; specifically an Israelite Sanhedrist (also figuratively, member of the celestial council) or Christian “presbyter”: - elder (-est), old.

G4245
πρεσβύτερος
presbuteros
Thayer Definition:
1) elder, of age
1a) the elder of two people
1b) advanced in life, an elder, a senior
1b1) forefathers
2) a term of rank or office
2a) among the Jews
2a1) members of the great council or Sanhedrin (because in early times the rulers of the people, judges, etc., were selected from elderly men)
2a2) of those who in separate cities managed public affairs and administered justice
2b) among the Christians, those who presided over the assemblies (or churches) The NT uses the term bishop, elders, and presbyters interchangeably
2c) the twenty four members of the heavenly Sanhedrin or court seated on thrones around the throne of God


'Among Christians-  those who preside over the assemblies-churches.   Also- the term elder means the same as the word bishop.'


Were these men- these elders/bishops- put in charge over the people of God expecting to be worshipped themselves? NO! NEVER!


Jesus was their EXAMPLE!  Jesus did NOT want people to ever worship other people, not ever. God was to be first always! Guidance was the most He wanted for people. The elders would guide the younger members- and this is in their new life as Christians. A fifty year old man newly born to Christ could be served well by a thirty year old man who has been a Christian for several years. Age does not lay claim to  knowledge in all things by any means.


Today we live in a world that has many leaders, and in our churches there are men who are leaders and those leaders more often than not believe they are above all others. Jesus taught the disciples this--


Mat 20:26  But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister;
Mat 20:27  And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant:
Mat 20:28  Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.


To minister, to give our lives, to be a servant and NOT just ceremonially, but in reality!  Never were people to take honor for themselves, never were people to put themselves above others.


Mat 23:2  Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
Mat 23:3  All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not.
Mat 23:4  For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
Mat 23:5  But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,
Mat 23:6  And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues,
Mat 23:7  And greetings in the markets, and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi.
Mat 23:8  But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren.
Mat 23:9  And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
Mat 23:10  Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, even Christ.
Mat 23:11  But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.


This is what our SAVIOR wanted for us, for HIS church, HIS people!  This however is NOT how things evolved for the mainstream churches not at all. The mainstream churches not long after our Savior died began taking steps away from Christ not towards Him!


1Jn 4:3  And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.


As politics and religion began to mingle so thoroughly men of God wanted to become men with great power, men with great influence.  This is NOT how God wanted it to be, not in the least!


These political wars being influenced so greatly by religious matters was NOT what God desired for His people, and yet those who believed they were greatest with God were in fact in league with the devil, knowingly or unknowingly.


More on this tomorrow by the grace of God!  We need so much to understand all this, and we can by His love.


In Him!!!


Amen.

Sunday, May 15, 2016

Serious Prophecy Studying- Don't Be Lukewarm.

2Ti_2:15  Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

Study.  We are doing some pretty serious studying here, SERIOUS studying. History and prophecy, prophecy given to us by God, our amazing God.  Do you know the prophecies? Do you study the prophecies?  I'm NOT a scholar. I wrote the current study back in 2011 and I'm reviewing it again now, why? Because while I know some, a lot of it is so easy to forget in my simple mind. I'm not saying I have any mental deficit, I'm saying I'm an average person who takes in information but quickly forgets details. So while I know what I believe I couldn't give you these details without the written information. Comprehending the truth- knowing that all that has come to past has been given in God's word, all pertaining to the coming of the Messiah, and the return of the Messiah I know it is TRUE. I have NO DOUBT, by the grace of God, no doubt at all that our SAVIOR will return as the Bible tells us. Satan wants us to doubt, to care little about our Savior's return beyond its possibility at some point in time.  Satan does NOT want us sure, Satan wants us lukewarm and for the majority of Christians this is exactly what they are LUKEWARM, ready for Christ to spew them from His mouth.

Please God, help us NOT to be lukewarm, but on fire, alive and hot to know You and Your truth, to be known of You!

Help us as we study, open our understanding as ONLY You can through the Holy Spirit!

All through our Savior, Jesus Christ, our Lord now and forever!

AMEN!

******* Continuing our prophecy study--  Please GO back and read the study from the beginning to gain full understanding of where we are if you haven't been following this study daily.  Thank you :)  God bless you! *******

Dan 11:24  'He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches…'

Augustus was able to do what his fathers hadn't, nor his father's father… he brought peace. With peace however came the end of the constant battling and  yet he had to keep up his armies. The armies enjoyed special privileges because of this. Pax Romana was introduced…

'Pax Romana (Latin for "Roman peace") was the long period of relative peace and minimal expansion by military force experienced by the Roman Empire in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD. Since it was established by Caesar Augustus it is sometimes called Pax Augusta. Its span was about 207 years (27 BC to 180 AD).[1]'

'The concept of Pax Romana was first described by Edward Gibbon in The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, in Chapter Two. Gibbon proposed a period of moderation under Augustus and his successors and argued that generals bent on expansion (e.g. Germanicus, Agricola and Corbulo) were checked and recalled by the Emperors during their victories favouring consolidation ahead of further expansion. Gibbon lists the Roman conquest of Britain under Claudius and the conquests of Trajan as exceptions to this policy of moderation and places the end of the period at the death of Marcus Aurelius in 180 AD, despite the conclusion of peace by the latter's son Commodus later in the same year. During the Pax Romana, the area of Roman rule expanded to about five million square kilometres (two million square miles).'

*

'Augustus faced a problem making peace an acceptable mode of life for the Romans, who had been at war with one power or another continuously for 200 years.[2] Romans regarded peace not as an absence of war, but the rare situation that existed when all opponents had been beaten down and lost the ability to resist.[3] Augustus' challenge was to persuade Romans that the prosperity they could achieve in the absence of warfare was better for the Empire than the potential wealth and honor acquired when fighting a risky war. Augustus succeeded by means of skillful propaganda. Subsequent emperors followed his lead, sometimes producing lavish ceremonies to close the Gates of Janus, issuing coins with Pax on the reverse, and patronizing literature extolling the benefits of the Pax Romana.[2]'

Pasted from  

*

Keeping other *strongholds* from becoming strong enough to devise against him was a task that had to be undertaken and was done so successfully.

 Daniel 11:24 '...yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time. '

'The provinces of the empire (as they have been described in the preceding chapter) were destitute of any public force, or constitutional freedom. In Etruria, in Greece, [28] and in Gaul, [29] it was the first
care of the senate to dissolve those dangerous confederacies, which taught mankind that, as the Roman arms prevailed by division, they might be resisted by union. Those princes, whom the ostentation of gratitude or generosity permitted for a while to hold a precarious sceptre, were
dismissed from their thrones, as soon as they had per formed their appointed task of fashioning to the yoke the vanquished nations. The free states and cities which had embraced the cause of Rome
were rewarded with a nominal alliance, and insensibly sunk into real servitude. The public authority was every where exercised by the ministers of the senate and of the emperors, and that authority was
absolute, and without control. [291] But the same salutary maxims of government, which had secured the peace and obedience of Italy were extended to the most distant conquests. A nation of Romans was gradually formed in the provinces, by the double expedient of introducing colonies, and of admitting the most faithful and deserving of the provincials to the freedom of Rome.'


Pasted from- Title: The History of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire   Volume 1 Author: Edward Gibbon Commentator: H. H. Milman
Posting Date: June 7, 2008 [EBook #731] Release Date: November, 1996 Language: English
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK DECLINE OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE ***

History reveals that the Roman Empire was to remain a relative peace for so long because it kept all those who might have had a chance to work up an army against them- in check- under the Roman thumb.
*
How long would this new and much different sort of life last?  Dan. 11:24 '...even for a time.'   As we learned a while back in studying prophecy 'a time' stands for something.   A year. A Biblical year is 360 days.  A prophetic year equal 360 years.  So if this time of Rome rule and relative peace under the Romans was to last 360 years what year would that bring us to if we take the date when the decisive battle of Actium was won and Augustus became the First Citizen of Rome- 31BC  then that brings us to 330 AD (accounting for the '0' transition year as we also noted previously - think number timeline negative to positive numbers)

Did anything momentous happen in 330AD?

• May 11 – Emperor Constantine the Great dedicates Constantinople, or Nova Roma (modern Istanbul), and moves the capital of the Roman Empire there from Rome. He has spent 4 years building the city on the site of ancient Byzantium; having chosen the site for its strategic location (a seaport with easy access to Anatolia and the Danube).
Pasted from  
*
But first before we get ahead of ourselves too far we have to continue into the time BEFORE that appointed time.  Things were to happen, many things that need to be pointed out so there would be NO doubt as to the Roman power in control here.  Is it any wonder we are being shown this several times?
Seriously, Rome- the legs of iron.
Rome the power in control at the time of our Savior's birth, life, and death!
Rome- the power that would eventually be divided but NEVER disappear fully- not until our Savior returns.
We cannot forget this very, very important point here. The legs of iron, the little horn power, which so prominently figure into prophecy. Those feet of iron mingled with clay would stand until crushed under the entering of the stone made without hands- our Savior's return and the end of the world as we know it. There would have been a MUCH different prophetic picture if we weren't to focus so heavily upon the Roman kingdom brought into play after Greece, which came into existence as a power after the Medes and Persians, which came to their height of power after Babylon.  These are HISTORIC FACTS!

The existence of this power would have influence until our Savior returns the same power that was in control when our Savior walked the earth. The pagan Rome power became papal Rome power and that power has never ended entirely though it's gone through various transitions, in fact the Papacy today is exceedingly proud of its 2000 year history, exceedingly proud!

So yes, it makes a lot of sense for Rome to be a major, major focus, an undeniable focus that warranted detail after detail in this vision given, so there would be no doubt as to the power of this force, no doubt whatsoever.  There is no doubt in my mind how these puzzle pieces of prophecy are fitting together. Very, very seldom is a puzzle ever put together in one continuous motion, but rather there is a piecing together, a weaving, an interlocking as the pieces are given.  History had to unfold, details of that history had to be recorded for all time. When the little book was opened and man was ready to find comprehension as the last cries for man to find their Savior were to begin to go forth with power, this was when the puzzle was truly begun and the pieces began to be put into their proper places.

Because the prophecy extends down to the very end we have not lived to that end, but we are found in there as those who are living in the time before Christ's return.  We have a special admonition to watch and pray or we'll be taken unaware.  By the grace of God we will NOT be taken unaware, but found in Him fully known by Him!


So continuing on...


Dan 11:25  And he shall stir up his power and his courage against the king of the south with a great army; and the king of the south shall be stirred up to battle with a very great and mighty army; but he shall not stand: for they shall forecast devices against him.
Dan 11:26  Yea, they that feed of the portion of his meat shall destroy him, and his army shall overflow: and many shall fall down slain.
Dan 11:27  And both these kings' hearts shall be to do mischief, and they shall speak lies at one table; but it shall not prosper: for yet the end shall be at the time appointed.
Dan 11:28  Then shall he return into his land with great riches; and his heart shall be against the holy covenant; and he shall do exploits, and return to his own land.

Is there a force that pits the King of the North with the King of the South in a great battle? Yes. We've gone over some of this before but now we have added details to look at.

Dan 11:26  Yea, they that feed of the portion of his meat shall destroy him, and his army shall overflow: and many shall fall down slain.
Dan 11:27  And both these kings' hearts shall be to do mischief, and they shall speak lies at one table; but it shall not prosper: for yet the end shall be at the time appointed.

The next bit from Wikipedia is lengthy but PLEASE take the time to read it.

*******

The final war of the Roman Republic, also known as Antony's civil war or the war between Antony and Octavian, was the last of the Roman civil wars of the republic, fought between Cleopatra (assisted by Mark Antony) and Octavian. After the Roman Senate declared war on the Egyptian queen Cleopatra, Antony, her lover and ally, betrayed the Roman government and joined the war on Cleopatra’s side. After the decisive victory for Octavian at the Battle of Actium, Cleopatra and Antony withdrew to Alexandria, where Octavian besieged the city until both Antony and Cleopatra committed suicide.

Following the end of the war, Octavian brought peace to the Roman state that had been plagued by a century of civil wars. Octavian became the most powerful man in the Roman world and the Senate bestowed upon him the name of Augustus in 27 BC. Octavian, now Augustus, would be the first Roman Emperor and would transform the oligarchic/democratic Republic into the autocratic Roman Empire.

The last Republican Civil War would mark the beginning of the Pax Romana, which remains the longest period of peace and stability that Europe has seen in recorded history.

Political and military buildup

The Caesarians Octavian (Caesar's principal, though not sole, heir), Mark Antony, and Marcus Lepidus under the Second Triumvirate had stepped in to fill the power vacuum caused by Julius Caesar's assassination. After the Triumvirate had defeated Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus at the Battle of Philippi (42 BC) and Lepidus was expelled from the Triumvirate (36 BC), Octavian and Antony were left as the two most powerful men in the Roman world. Octavian took control of the west, including Hispania, Gaul, Italia, and Africa. Antony received control of the east, including Graecia, Asia, Syria and Aegyptus.

For a time, Rome saw peace. Octavian put down revolts in the west while Antony reorganized the east; however, the peace was short lived. Antony had been having an affair with the queen of Egypt, Cleopatra. Rome, especially Octavian, took note of Antony’s actions. Since 40 BC, Antony had been married to Octavia Minor, the sister of Octavian. Octavian seized the opportunity and had his minister Gaius Maecenas produce a propaganda campaign against Antony.

All of Rome felt astonished when they heard word of Antony’s Donations of Alexandria. In these donations, Antony ceded much of Rome’s territory in the east to Cleopatra. Cleopatra and Caesarion were crowned co-rulers of Egypt and Cyprus; Alexander Helios was crowned ruler of Armenia, Media, and Parthia; Cleopatra Selene II was crowned ruler of Cyrenaica and Libya; and Ptolemy Philadelphus was crowned ruler of Phoenicia, Syria, and Cilicia. Cleopatra took the title of Queen of Kings and Caesarion took the title of King of Kings.

In response, Octavian increased the personal attacks against Antony, but the Senate and people of Rome were not convinced. Octavian’s chance came when Antony married Cleopatra in 32 BC before he divorced Octavia. That action combined with information that Antony was planning to establish a second Senate in Alexandria created the perfect environment for Octavian to strip Antony of his power.

Octavian summoned the Senate and accused Antony of anti-Roman sentiments. Octavian had illegally seized Antony’s will from the Temple of Vesta. In it, Antony recognized Caesarion as Caesar's legal heir, left his possessions to his children by Cleopatra, and finally indicated his desire to be buried with Cleopatra in Alexandria instead of in Rome. The Senators were not moved by Caesarion or Antony’s children but Antony’s desire to be buried outside of Rome invoked the Senate’s rage. Octavian, the natural politician he was, blamed Cleopatra and not Antony. The Senate declared war on Cleopatra, and Octavian knew that Antony would come to her aid.

When Cleopatra received word that Rome had declared war, Antony threw his support to Egypt. Immediately, the Senate stripped Antony of all his official power and labeled him as an outlaw and a traitor. Octavian summoned all of his legions, numbered at almost 200,000 Roman legionaries. Cleopatra and Antony did the same, assembling roughly the same number in mixed heavy Roman and light Egyptian infantry.

The War
 Naval theater

The Battle of Actium was the decisive battle of the naval theater.

By mid-summer of 31 BC, Antony maneuvered his army into Greece and Octavian soon followed. Octavian brought with him his chief military advisor and closest friend Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa to command his naval forces. Although the ground forces were comparable, Octavian's fleet was superior. Antony's fleet was made up of large vessels, but with inexperienced crews and commanders. Octavian's fleet of smaller, more maneuverable vessels was filled with experienced sailors.

Octavian moved his soldiers cross the Adriatic Sea to confront Antony near Actium. Meanwhile, Agrippa disrupted Antony's supply lines with the navy. Gaius Sosius commanded a squadron in Mark Anthony's fleet with which he managed to defeat the squadron of Lucius Arruntius and put it to flight, but when the latter was reinforced by Marcus Agrippa, Sosius's ally Tarcondimotus - the king of Cilicia - was killed and Sosius himself was forced to flee.

Octavian decided not to attack and risk unnecessary losses. Instead, Octavian wanted to battle Antony by sea where his experienced sailors could dominate. In response, Antony and Octavian engaged in Fabian strategy until the time was right. As the summer ended and autumn began to set in, both Octavian and Antony settled for a battle of attrition. The strategy of delay paid dividends to Octavian's cause, as morale sank and prominent Romans deserted Antony's cause.

The first conflict of the war occurred when Octavian's general Agrippa captured the Greek city and naval port of Methone. The city had previously been loyal to Antony. Although Antony was an experienced soldier, he did not understand naval combat, which led to his downfall. Antony moved his fleet to Actium where Octavian’s navy and army had taken camp. In what would become known as the Battle of Actium, Antony, on September 2, 31 BC, moved his large quinqueremes through the strait and into the open sea. There, Octavian’s light and maneuverable Liburnian ships drew in battle formation against Antony’s warships. Cleopatra stayed behind Antony’s line on her royal barge.

A devastating blow to Antony’s forces came when one of Antony’s former generals delivered to Octavian Antony’s battle plan. Antony had hoped to use his biggest ships to drive back Agrippa's wing on the north end of his line, but Octavian's entire fleet stayed carefully out of range. Shortly after mid-day, Antony was forced to extend his line out from the protection of the shore, and then finally engage the enemy. Octavian's fleet, armed with better trained and fresher crews, made quick work of Antony’s larger and less experienced navy. Octavian’s soldiers had spent years fighting in Roman naval combat, where one objective was to ram the enemy ship and at the same time kill the above deck crew with a shower of arrows and catapult-launched stones large enough to decapitate a man.

As the armies stood on either side of the naval battle, they watched as Antony was being outmatched by Agrippa. Seeing that the battle was going against Antony, Cleopatra's fleet retreated to open sea without firing a shot, leaving Antony to fight for himself. As a gap opened in Agrippa's blockade, she funneled through, and was soon closely followed by Antony's command ships. The commanders of Antony's land forces, which were supposed to follow him to Asia, promptly surrendered their legions without a fight. Antony retreated to a smaller vessel with his flag and managed to escape to Alexandria. By the end of the day, Antony’s entire fleet would lie at the bottom of the sea and the Roman world had witnessed the largest naval battle in almost 200 years.

 Land campaign

With Octavian now in control of nearly 60 legions (approximately 360,000 men), he was left as the indisputable master of the Roman world. Although Octavian wanted to immediately pursue Antony and Cleopatra, many of his veterans wanted to retire and return to private life. Octavian allowed many of his longest serving veterans (as many as 10 legions by some accounts) to retire. Many of those legionaries could trace their service to Julius Caesar some 20 years earlier.

After the winter ended, Octavian resumed the hunt. In the spring of 30 BC, Octavian rejected the idea of transporting his army across the sea and attacking Alexandria directly, and instead traveled by land through Asia. Antony had received much of his backing from Rome’s client kingdoms in the east. By marching his army by land, he ensured Antony could not regroup and cement his authority over the provinces.

The Death of Cleopatra by Reginald Arthur.

Meanwhile, Antony attempted to secure an army in Cyrenaica from Lucius Pinarius. Unfortunately for Antony, Pinarius had switched his loyalty to Octavian. When Octavian received word of this development, he ordered Pinarius to move his four legions east towards Alexandria while Octavian would move west. Trapped in Egypt with the remnant of his former army, Antony and Cleopatra bided their time awaiting Octavian's arrival.

When Octavian and Pinarius arrived at Alexandria, they placed the entire city under siege. Before Octavian had arrived, Antony took the roughly 10,000 soldiers he had left and attacked Pinarius, unaware that he was outnumbered 2 to 1. Pinarius destroyed what was left of Antony’s army with Antony escaping back to Alexandria before Octavian arrived. As Octavian approached with his legions, what remained of Antony's cavalry and fleet surrendered to Octavian. Most of Antony’s infantry surrendered without any engagement at this stage of the conflict, they were Italian veterans and Antony's cause was lost.

Antony was forced to watch as his army and hopes of dominance in Rome were handed to Octavian. In honorable Roman tradition, Antony, on August 1, 30 BC, fell on his sword. According to the ancients accounts however, he was not entirely successful and with an open wound in his belly, was taken to join Cleopatra, who had fled to her mausoleum. Here Antony succumbed to his wound and supposedly died in his lover's arms, leaving her alone to face Octavian.

Cleopatra did not immediately follow Antony in suicide. Instead, in a last ditch effort, Cleopatra opened negotiations with Octavian. Cleopatra begged Octavian to spare Caesarion’s life in exchange for willing imprisonment. Octavian refused. Within a week, Octavian informed Cleopatra that she was to play a role in Octavian's Triumph back in Rome. This role was "carefully explained to her", while Caesarion was "butchered without compunction". Octavian supposedly said "two Caesars are one too many" as he ordered Caesarion's death.[3] According to Strabo who was alive at the time of the event, Cleopatra died from a self-induced bite from a venomous snake, or from applying a poisonous ointment to herself.[4] With Cleopatra's death, the final war of the Republic was over.

Due to this war, Octavian would become Augustus and the first Roman Emperor.
 Aftermath

Within a month, Octavian was named Pharaoh, and Egypt became his personal possession. With Octavian in control of all of Rome's provinces and over 50 legions, he was now the undisputed master of the Roman world. Through executing Antony's supporters, Octavian finally brought a century of civil war to a close. Within a few years, Octavian was named Augustus by the Senate and given unprecedented powers. Octavian, now Augustus, merged the western and eastern halves of the Republic into the Roman Empire with Augustus ruling it as the first Roman Emperor.

In the ensuing months and years, Augustus passed the series of laws that while outwardly preserving the appearance of the Republic made his position within it of paramount power and authority. He laid the foundations for what is now called the Roman Empire. From then on, the Roman state would be ruled by a Princeps (first citizen), in modern terms, Rome would from now on be ruled by Emperors. The Senate ostensibly still had power and authority over certain Senatorial provinces, however, the critical border provinces, like Syria, Egypt, Gaul, requiring the greatest numbers of legions would be directly ruled by Augustus and the Emperors who succeeded him.

With the end of the last Republican civil war, the Republic was replaced by the Empire. Augustus's reign would usher in a golden era of Roman culture and produce a stability that Rome had not seen in over a century. With Rome in control of the entire Mediterranean world, a peace that would reign in the Roman world for centuries after Augustus’s death: the Pax Romana (Roman Peace). The Empire that Augustus established would last in Western Europe until the fall of Rome in the 5th century AD. The Eastern part of the Roman Empire would also survive as the Byzantine Empire until the fall of Constantinople in 1453 AD.

*******

Remember this…


Dan 11:26  Yea, they that feed of the portion of his meat shall destroy him, and his army shall overflow: and many shall fall down slain.
Dan 11:27  And both these kings' hearts shall be to do mischief, and they shall speak lies at one table; but it shall not prosper: for yet the end shall be at the time appointed.

The GREAT deceptions that took place!  If it weren't for the lies spoken, if it weren't for the those sitting at his table bent on destroying him- Antony wouldn't have lost the battle so decisively.  Betrayal. Those who are dependent upon you turning upon you causing your destruction.  Read the following about one of Mark Antony's trusted generals!

--

Lucius Pinarius Scarpus (flourished 1st century BC) was a Roman that lived in the late Roman Republic and the early Roman Empire.

According to Suetonius,[1] Pinarius was a great nephew of dictator Gaius Julius Caesar through one his sisters (sororum nepotes). His cousins were consul Quintus Pedius, Octavia Minor (the fourth wife of Triumvir Mark Antony) and Octavian (future first Roman Emperor Augustus).[2]

His father was a member of the gens Pinaria, an ancient, distinguished family of patrician status. The family can be traced to the foundations of Rome. Various members of the gens served as priests and were among the first to serve as consuls in the republic.

Little is known on Scarpus' early life. He is first mentioned in the ancient sources when Caesar was assassinated in Rome in March 44 BC. In the will of Caesar, Scarpus received one eighth of the property of the dictator, the same amount as Pedius. The main heir of Caesar was Octavian, who received three quarters of the property of his great uncle. But Scarpus and Pedius also assigned their inheritance to Octavian.[3]

Scarpus became an ally to Mark Antony and commanded for him in the war against the murderers of Caesar, Marcus Junius Brutus and Gaius Cassius Longinus.[4] In the years leading up to the Final War of the Roman Republic, in Actium Greece 31 BC, Antony appointed Scarpus to the military command of Cyrenaica. Scarpus had with him four legions to command. During his time in Cyrenaica Scarpus had control of the currency mint in Cyrene, as he became a moneyer. Scarpus had issued various coins bearing Antony’s name and Scarpus’ name was inscripted as an issuer of these coins.

After Antony and his lover, the Ptolemaic Greek Queen Cleopatra VII of Egypt, were defeated by Octavian at Actium (September 2, 31 BC), they sailed back to North Africa. Antony sent messengers to Scarpus for help. But Scarpus refused to see Antony’s messengers and put them to death. Instead he changed sides.[5] He gave his legions to Gaius Cornelius Gallus, Octavian’s lieutenant, to command.[6] While Octavian marched from the East through Asia, Syria and Judea against Egypt, Cornelius Gallus advanced with Scarpus’ legions from the west against Alexandria.

When Antony and Cleopatra died, Octavian became the new Roman master and then emperor. Augustus had appointed his cousin as the Roman governor of Cyrenaica. Scarpus as he did for Antony, became a moneyer and had issued various coins bearing Augustus’ name. On these coins, Scarpus had his name inscripted as an issuer of the coins. Beyond this, nothing is known on Scarpus.

*

When Octavian arrived he had fresh crews and small light ships that were easier to maneuver compared to the huge ships that Mark Antony had, as the battle progressed, Antony’s general (Delius) decided that he was going to switch side when he saw which way the battle was going, so on he went to Octavian taking Mark Antony’s battle plans with him.

Pasted from  

*

Before the naval battle Mark Antony's general known as Delius defected to Octavian and brought with him Mark Antony’s battle plans. Antony had hoped to use his biggest ships to drive back Agrippa's wing on the north end of his line, but Octavian's entire fleet stayed carefully out of range. Shortly after mid-day, Antony was forced to extend his line out from the protection of the shore, and then finally engage the enemy.

Pasted from  


The details here are unmistakable. Could Octavian have won the battle so incredibly without all the defecting and betrayal towards Antony? I honestly can't answer that, but all that betrayal surely hastened the end of the rebellion and herald in the Roman Empire- and it was predicted!

*******

Dan 11:28  Then shall he return into his land with great riches; and his heart shall be against the holy covenant; and he shall do exploits, and return to his own land.

Was Agrippa a friend of the Jewish people, God's chosen?  No, not especially in fact he had the distinction of being the head of the pagan religions because he welcomed more and more cults and deities allowing them to merge with established Roman deities.

'After the civil wars and social upheavals that led to the collapse of the Roman Republic, Caesar's heir Augustus carried out a program of religious revivalism designed to frame his ascent to sole power as a restoration of peace, tradition, and rectitude in accordance with divine will. The Augustan institution of Imperial cult put pious respect for tradition on display, and aimed to foster religious unity and mutual toleration among Rome's newly acquired provinces. The preservation of the "religion of Numa" remained the foundation of Rome's security and continued success.

But as Rome had extended its dominance throughout the Mediterranean world, its religious mode was to absorb the deities and cults of other peoples rather than to eradicate and replace them.[2] Both fascinated by and deeply suspicious of religious novelty, Romans looked for ways to understand and reinterpret the divinities of others by means of their own, and acknowledged religion in the provinces or foreign territories as an expression of local identity and traditions. Some religious practices were embraced officially, others merely tolerated. A few were condemned as alien hysteria, magic or superstition, and thus unwanted at Rome. Attempts, sometimes brutal, were made periodically to suppress religionists who seemed to threaten traditional morality and unity. In the eyes of conservative Romans, the Dionysian mysteries encouraged illicit behaviour and subversion; Christianity was superstition, or atheism, or both; druidism employed human sacrifice. The monotheistic rigor of Judaism led sometimes to compromise and the granting of special exemptions, and sometimes to intractable conflict. By the height of the Roman Empire, however, numerous foreign cults were practiced at Rome and throughout even the most remote provinces, among them the mystery cult of the syncretized Egyptian goddess Isis and deities of solar monism such as Mithras and Sol Invictus, found as far north as Roman Britain.'

Pasted from  


*******
More than enough for today, a lot to digest!

Such a blessed Sabbath day (2011)! Praise and glory to God!  Thank you Lord for all You've done!  All through Your love,  Your grace, Your mercy!!!!


Amen.



Saturday, May 14, 2016

No one can make you believe in prophecy, not even Christ Jesus.


Prophecy is amazing. It reminds me a bit about what Christ said about parables-

Mat 13:10  And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?
Mat 13:11  He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.
Mat 13:12  For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.
Mat 13:13  Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.
Mat 13:14  And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
Mat 13:15  For this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.
Mat 13:16  But blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.
Mat 13:17  For verily I say unto you, That many prophets and righteous men have desired to see those things which ye see, and have not seen them; and to hear those things which ye hear, and have not heard them.


Why speak in parables, why not speak plainly?


Because it's given to some to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven- but to others it's not given.


And that sounds awful doesn't it? Like God is selecting a few and offering them eternal life but not others, which isn't true at all!


Jesus went on to say- 'because they seeing - see not; and hearing they- hear not, neither do they understand'


Jesus also added- 'for this people's heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed-  lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted and I should heal them.'


PEOPLE don't want healing! PEOPLE don't want to hear! PEOPLE don't want to see! People don't want to be converted from their evil ways! It's the choice people make, not God's choice. God is willing to heal, willing that all would come to Him, but they won't. Sadly, they won't.


It's the same for prophecy- there can be understanding, pieces can fit together. Logically things can follow order and make sense but to most people it is all just jumbled nonsense that points to the end of days and only then will it all come to pass.  The facts don't concern them because it's just too hard to understand it all.  Then you'll get those who piece things together somewhat and do so differently than others and so discount another's belief. I know there are many, many people out there that won't agree at all with the interpretations I've posted and that's fine. We all have to follow how God leads us, every single one of us. I'm not writing what I'm writing to convince others of anything. I feel compelled by God on my walk with Christ to study prophecy and that's what I'm doing. I just hope and pray that I'm not deceived, that the Holy Spirit will guide my studying.

******* Continuing our prophecy study--  Please GO back and read the study from the beginning to gain full understanding of where we are if you haven't been following this study daily.  Thank you :)  God bless you! ******


Yesterday we studied from the reign of Julius, to Augustus, and then to Tiberius Caesar who lived when our Savior was killed.  All the while we're talking about Tiberius we are also talking about the Roman Empire which is the big picture. We cannot separate any of these rulers from the Roman Kingdom- never. So while the prophecy is giving us details it is NEVER leaving the main kingdoms that were first predicted by Daniel interpreting Nebuchadnezzar's dream.


Do you remember how over and over the prophecy is revisiting the same empires- growing in detail each time. Well we have another case of that here.


We know that Augustus Caesar was the man who solidified the Roman Empire.  Remember this---


Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus-- is considered the first emperor of the Roman Empire, which he ruled alone from 27 BC until his death in AD 14. Born Gaius Octavius Thurinus, he was adopted posthumously by his great-uncle Gaius Julius Caesar in 44 BC via his last will and testament, and between then and 27 BC was officially named Gaius Julius Caesar.


Augustus was ruling when Rome (HE) worked deceitfully, becoming strong with a small people.


Dan 11:23  And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.


'The Battle of Actium was the decisive confrontation of the Final War of the Roman Republic. It was fought between the forces of Octavian and the combined forces of Mark Antony and Cleopatra VII. The battle took place on 2 September 31 BC, on the Ionian Sea near the city of Actium, at the Roman province of Epirus vetus in Greece. Octavian's fleet was commanded by Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, while Antony's fleet was supported by the ships of Queen Cleopatra of Ptolemaic Egypt.
Octavian's victory enabled him to consolidate his power over Rome and its dominions. To that end, he adopted the title of Princeps ("first citizen") and some years after the victory was awarded the title of Augustus by the Roman Senate. This became the name by which he was known in later times. As Augustus, he would retain the trappings of a restored Republican leader; however, historians generally view this consolidation of power and the adoption of these honorifics as the end of the Roman Republic and the beginning of the Roman Empire.[1]'

Pasted from  


This victory by Augustus (under the name of Octavian) CONSOLIDATED his power over Rome and its dominions.


'Thus, Octavian's victory at the Battle of Actium gave him sole and uncontested control of "Mare Nostrum" (Our Sea i.e. the Roman Mediterannean) and he became "Augustus Caesar" and the "first citizen" of Rome. This victory, consolidating his power over every Roman institution, marked the transition of Rome from Republic to Empire. Egypt's final surrender following Cleopatra's death also marks the final demise of both the Hellenistic Age and the Ptolemaic Kingdom'

Pasted from  


'Worldwide consequences
Shakespeare turned the story of Antony and Cleopatra into a famous play, but historically, the Battle of Actium had even more important consequences.
Octavian, for his part, remained standing as the sole ruler of Rome in a time when the Republic was hanging on by a thread. Just a few years later, he was renamed Augustus and declared divine head of the new Roman Empire, a system that would last a further 400 years and engulf much of Europe, as well as parts of the Middle East and Africa under its rule.
Rome's influence over the language, religion and architecture of the 2.2 million square miles it once controlled lasts until this day.
By killing Julius Caesar and Cleopatra's son Caesarion, Octavian also effectively ended a 4,000-year tradition in Egypt. There would not be another true pharaoh in that country, which was absorbed under the banner of the empire. '

Pasted from  


NOTICE THIS--


'... divine head of the new Roman Empire, a system that would last a further 400 years and engulf much of Europe, as well as parts of the Middle East and Africa under its rule'


And this--

'Before an assembly thus modelled and prepared, Augustus pronounced a studied oration, which displayed his patriotism, and disguised his ambition. "He lamented, yet excused, his past conduct. Filial piety had required at his hands the revenge of his father's murder; the humanity of his own nature had sometimes given way to the stern laws of necessity, and to a forced connection with two unworthy colleagues: as long as Antony lived, the republic forbade him to abandon her to a degenerate Roman, and a barbarian queen. He was now at liberty to satisfy his duty and his inclination. He solemnly restored the senate and people to all their ancient rights; and wished only to mingle with the crowd of his fellow-citizens, and to share the blessings which he had obtained for his country." [4]

[Footnote 4: Dion (l. liii. p. 698) gives us a prolix and bombast speech on this great occasion. I have borrowed from Suetonius and Tacitus the general language of Augustus.]

It would require the pen of Tacitus (if Tacitus had assisted at this assembly) to describe the various emotions of the senate, those thatwere suppressed, and those that were affected. It was dangerous to
trust the sincerity of Augustus; to seem to distrust it was still more dangerous. The respective advantages of monarchy and a republic have often divided speculative inquirers; the present greatness of the Roman state, the corruption of manners, and the license of the soldiers, supplied new arguments to the advocates of monarchy; and these general views of government were again warped by the hopes and fears of each individual. Amidst this confusion of sentiments, the answer of the senate was unanimous and decisive. They refused to accept the resignation of Augustus; they conjured him not to desert the republic, which he had saved. After a decent resistance, the crafty tyrant submitted to the orders of the senate; and consented to receive the government of the provinces, and the general command of the Roman armies, under the well-known names of Proconsul and Imperator. [5] But
he would receive them only for ten years. Even before the expiration of that period, he hope that the wounds of civil discord would be completely healed, and that the republic, restored to its pristine
health and vigor, would no longer require the dangerous interposition of so extraordinary a magistrate. The memory of this comedy, repeated several times during the life of Augustus, was preserved to the last ages of the empire…'

http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/731/pg731.txt


Dan 11:23  And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.

This deceit was REAL, very, very real in the rule of Augustus!

That Rome became strong with a small people is a reality--

'Peregrinus was the term used during the early Roman empire, from 30 BC to 212 AD, to denote a free provincial subject of the empire who was not a Roman citizen. Peregrini constituted the vast majority of the empire's inhabitants in the 1st and 2nd centuries AD. In 212 AD, all free inhabitants of the Empire were granted citizenship by the constitutio Antoniniana, abolishing the status of peregrinus.

The Latin peregrinus "foreigner, one from abroad" is a derivation from the adverb peregre "from abroad", composed of per- "abroad" and agri, the locative of ager "field, country". During the Roman Republic, the term peregrinus simply denoted any person who did not hold Roman citizenship, full or partial, whether that person was under Roman rule or not. Technically, this remained the case during the Imperial era. But in practice the term became limited to subjects of the empire, with inhabitants of regions outside the empire's borders denoted barbari (barbarians).'

Pasted from  


People we were NOT born Roman, made up the majority of ROME! Soldiers that fought for others gave their allegiance to Rome by being made Roman citizens.  They took a few and made MANY! He became strong from those people, very, very strong.

*


This is enough for tonight, little bit by little bit to digest, to read over and over and compare to Scripture.  To go delve deep into our libraries, into historical sources. Do these fit? Does this paint the picture being portrayed? Does it make logical sense? We have so much to learn, so much to study and to understand ALL by the GRACE of GOD!  May God help us! May God guide us always!!!


In His LOVE!


Amen!

Friday, May 13, 2016

Caesar Augustus, Tiberius, Julius Caesar and You- All a Part of Prophecy

Julius Caesar, Caesar Augustus, Tiberius-  all prophetically known.

Luk 3:1  Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of Ituraea and of the region of Trachonitis, and Lysanias the tetrarch of Abilene,
Luk 3:2  Annas and Caiaphas being the high priests, the word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness.
Luk 3:3  And he came into all the country about Jordan, preaching the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins;
Luk 3:4  As it is written in the book of the words of Esaias the prophet, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.

Tiberius Caesar ruled when our Savior began His ministry in power and when He was crucified, and resurrected-  just as predicted by God through His prophet Daniel hundreds of years before it ever took place.

Read on, it is SO incredibly important.  You must believe the fulfilled prophecy so you comprehend the unfulfilled will one day be fulfilled and YOU are a part of that unfulfilled prophecy.

By the grace and mercy of our Savior-- may we know and be known by Him!  All through His love!



******* Continuing our prophecy study--  Please GO back and read the study from the beginning to gain full understanding of where we are if you haven't been following this study daily.  Thank you :)  God bless you! ******

…we studied prophecy that revealed the down fall of the Grecian Empire and the rise of the Roman Empire.  We left off having seen where prophecy predicted Julius Caesar's demise.

We noted something previously that needs to be noted once again. The continuous use of the North and South as kingdoms, kings.  From one leader to the next whoever was in control of the land north of Jerusalem and south of Jerusalem were the kings of the North and South.  Very understandable to us because we've lived with the kings of various countries today and when that king dies another becomes the king of that country, that land. The land remains the same even if the kings change over and over again.

Picking up next we're going to see the king who lived when Jesus was born.

Dan 11:20  Then shall stand up in his estate a raiser of taxes in the glory of the kingdom: but within few days he shall be destroyed, neither in anger, nor in battle.

After Julius Caesar came Caesar Augustus.

Luk 2:1  And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed

'Augustus
Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus  23 September 63 BC – 19 August AD 14 is considered the first emperor of the Roman Empire, which he ruled alone from 27 BC until his death in AD 14.
 Born Gaius Octavius Thurinus, he was adopted posthumously by his great-uncle Gaius Julius Caesar in 44 BC via his last will and testament, and between then and 27 BC was officially named Gaius Julius Caesar.
In 27 BC the Senate awarded him the honorific Augustus ("the revered one"), and thus consequently he was Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus. Because of the various names he bore, it is common to call him Octavius when referring to events between 63 and 44 BC, Octavian (or Octavianus) when referring to events between 44 and 27 BC, and Augustus when referring to events after 27 BC. In Greek sources, Augustus is known as  (Octavius),  (Caesar),  (Augustus), or  (Sebastos), depending on context.
The young Octavius came into his inheritance after Caesar's assassination in 44 BC.'
Pasted from  

Dan 11:20  Then shall stand up in his estate a raiser of taxes in the glory of the kingdom: but within few days he shall be destroyed, neither in anger, nor in battle.

A raiser of taxes.

Luk 2:1  And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed

ALL the world should be taxed!  

These two verses  fit!  

As for being destroyed…Augustus was a very sickly man throughout his remaining years, 14 or so after the tax decree went forth as noted in Luke 2:1.

'He was of short stature, handsome and well proportioned and he possessed that commodity so rare in rulers - grace. Though he suffered from bad teeth and was generally of feeble health. His body was covered in spots and he had many birthmarks scattered over his chest and belly.'
Pasted from  

'Though officially retired from public life, he worked tirelessly despite fragile health to reform the political & social structure of the Roman state, producing a long string of projects & edicts that were ratified by the Senate. Rather than personally engaging in military campaigns, he relied on professional soldiers like Agrippa & his stepson, Tiberius.'
Pasted from  

'Octavian was a competent politician and military commander but his real talent was as an administrator. He introduced the administrative reforms that led to the Pax Romana with its flourishing of trade and the arts. He did this while ostensibly maintaining the form of the Roman Republic while in actuality creating the Roman Empire. He did this through diligent hard work in spite of bouts of ill health and personal tragedies. '
Pasted from  

Augustus lived a long time, but only a short time after our Savior was born, and he didn't die in battle like so many leaders did.

Now we need to look at what is next…

Dan 11:21  And in his estate shall stand up a vile person...

A vile person shall stand up in this ruler's place- did this happen?

Tiberius was next.

'Tiberius (Latin: Tiberius Julius Caesar Augustus;[1] November 16, 42 BC – March 16, AD 37), was Roman Emperor from 14 AD to 37 AD.'

Pasted from  

Was he a vile person?

'The characterisation of Tiberius throughout the first six books is mostly negative, and gradually worsens as his rule declines, identifying a clear breaking point with the death of Drusus in 23 AD.[86] The rule of Julio-Claudians is generally described as unjust and 'criminal' by Tacitus.[89] Even at the outset of his reign, he seems to ascribe many of Tiberius' virtues merely to hypocrisy.[79] Another major recurring theme concerns the balance of power between the Senate and the Emperors, corruption, and the growing tyranny among the governing classes of Rome. A substantial amount of his account on Tiberius is therefore devoted to the treason trials and persecutions following the revival of the maiestas law under Augustus.[90] Ultimately, Tacitus' opinion on Tiberius is best illustrated by his conclusion of the sixth book:
His character too had its distinct periods. It was a bright time in his life and reputation, while under Augustus he was a private citizen or held high offices; a time of reserve and crafty assumption of virtue, as long as Germanicus and Drusus were alive. Again, while his mother lived, he was a compound of good and evil; he was infamous for his cruelty, though he veiled his debaucheries, while he loved or feared Sejanus. Finally, he plunged into every wickedness and disgrace, when fear and shame being cast off, he simply indulged his own inclinations.[79]'
Pasted from  

He was a very vile person.

Dan. 11:21 '... to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom…'

'Tiberius, the second emperor of Rome, was not the first choice of Augustus and was not popular with the Roman people. ' Pasted from  

Tiberius did not have the favor of the people of Rome at all.

'Tiberius was cold and unpopular in his manners, awkward and even timid in his carriage, but a master of dissimulation. The only person of whom he stood in awe was his mother Livia; but he lived in constant fear of insurrection. Aelius Sejanus, the Prefect of the Praetorians, had long been the friend and chief adviser of the emperor. Sejanus was cruel, unscrupulous, and ambitious in fact the proper instrument of a tyrant. In A.D. 27 Tiberius hid himself in the island of Capri where he built twelve villas in different parts of the island living with a few companions. No one was allowed to land upon the shores of Capri except of course Sejanus and even fishermen who broke this rule through ignorance were severely punished. Every day, however, dispatches were brought from the continent and he still continued to direct the affairs of his vast empire. Sejanus was left to govern Rome but eventually Tiberius realised that Sejanus had become so powerful that he himself was at risk. Tiberius sent a letter to the Senate in which he denounced Sejanus as a traitor. Sejanus was flung into the Mamertine Prison, and there he was strangled in 31AD. The people of Rome threw his body into the Tiber. Great numbers of his friends or relatives perished with Sejanus, and a general massacre filled Rome with terror. Tiberius, meanwhile, seems to have become a raging madman. He put to death his niece Agrippina, with her two children and ruled over the Senate with pitiless cruelty. Tiberius died on March 16, A.D. 37. He is believed to have been smothered with a pillow. Tiberius left the empire in a prosperous condition. His cruelty, in fact, seems to have been exercised upon the great and the rich, while the people of Rome lived in relative security.'
Pasted from  

Did the following happen?

Dan. 11:21… but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.

Yes. He didn't come in warring for the position, it was handed to him by Augustus, who didn't really want him in there but he was the only obvious choice left for him. He obtained the kingdom not by war but by flatteries.  Read this...

'In response, a series of potential heirs seem to have been selected, among them Tiberius and his brother, Drusus. In 24 BC, at the age of seventeen, Tiberius entered politics under Augustus's direction, receiving the position of quaestor,[8] and was granted the right to stand for election as praetor and consul five years in advance of the age required by law.[9] Similar provisions were made for Drusus.[10]'
*
'With Tiberius's departure, succession rested solely on Augustus' two young grandsons, Lucius and Gaius Caesar. The situation became more precarious in AD 2 with the death of Lucius. Augustus, with perhaps some pressure from Livia, allowed Tiberius to return to Rome as a private citizen and nothing more.[27] In AD 4, Gaius was killed in Armenia and Augustus had no other choice but to turn to Tiberius.[28][29]

The death of Gaius in AD 4 initiated a flurry of activity in the household of Augustus. Tiberius was adopted as full son and heir and in turn, he was required to adopt his nephew, Germanicus, the son of his brother Drusus and Augustus' niece Antonia Minor.[28][30] Along with his adoption, Tiberius received tribunician power as well as a share of Augustus's maius imperium, something that even Marcus Agrippa may never have had.[31] In AD 7, Agrippa Postumus, a younger brother of Gaius and Lucius, was disowned by Augustus and banned to the island of Pianosa, to live in solitary confinement.[29][32] Thus, when in AD 13, the powers held by Tiberius were made equal, rather than second, to Augustus's own powers, he was for all intents and purposes a "co-princeps" with Augustus, and in the event of the latter's passing, would simply continue to rule without an interregnum or possible upheaval.[33] Augustus died in AD 14, at the age of 75.[34] He was buried with all due ceremony and, as had been arranged beforehand, deified, his will read, and Tiberius confirmed as his sole surviving heir.[35]'
Pasted from  

He was adopted into the position.

Dan 11:22  And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him and shall be broken;….'

Arms of a flood, overflown.  We cannot forget that these were still tumultuous times with constant battles being waged for territory- unlike today when we actually see very little battle waged for territories. Yes, there are some, but not like back then, not by a long shot.

Read this…

'Rise and fall of Germanicus

Problems arose quickly for the new Princeps. The legions posted in Pannonia and in Germania had not been paid the bonuses promised them by Augustus, and after a short period of time, when it was clear that a response from Tiberius was not forthcoming, mutinied.[45] Germanicus and Tiberius's son, Drusus Julius Caesar, were dispatched with a small force to quell the uprising and bring the legions back in line. Rather than simply quell the mutiny however, Germanicus rallied the mutineers and led them on a short campaign across the Rhine into Germanic territory, stating that whatever treasure they could grab would count as their bonus.[46] Germanicus's forces smashed across the Rhine and quickly occupied all of the territory between the Rhine and the Elbe. Additionally, Tacitus records the capture of the Teutoburg forest and the reclaiming of standards lost years before by Publius Quinctilius Varus,[47] when three Roman legions and its auxiliary cohorts had been ambushed by a band of Germans.[47] Germanicus had managed to deal a significant blow to Rome's enemies, quell an uprising of troops, and once again return lost standards to Rome, actions that increased the fame and legend of the already very popular Germanicus with the Roman people.[48]

After being recalled from Germania,[49] Germanicus celebrated a triumph in Rome in AD 17,[47] the first full triumph that the city had seen since Augustus's own in 29 BC. As a result, in AD 18 Germanicus was granted control over the eastern part of the empire, just as both Agrippa and Tiberius had received before, and was clearly the successor to Tiberius.[50] Germanicus survived a little over a year before dying, accusing Gnaeus Calpurnius Piso, the governor of Syria, of poisoning him.[51] The Pisones had been longtime supporters of the Claudians, and had allied themselves with the young Octavian after his marriage to Livia, the mother of Tiberius; Germanicus's death and accusations indicted the new Princeps. Piso was placed on trial and, according to Tacitus, threatened to implicate Tiberius.[52] Whether the governor actually could connect the Princeps to the death of Germanicus will never be known; rather than continuing to stand trial when it became evident that the Senate was against him, Piso committed suicide.[53][54] Tiberius seems to have tired of politics at this point. In AD 22, he shared his tribunician authority with his son Drusus,[55] and began making yearly excursions to Campania that reportedly became longer and longer every year. In AD 23, Drusus mysteriously died,[56][57] and Tiberius seems to have made no effort to elevate a replacement. Finally, in AD 26, Tiberius retired from Rome altogether to the island of Capri.[58]
Pasted from  

They SMASHED across the Rhine. They QUICKLY occupied. Deal a SIGNIFICANT blow. Return LOST standards to Rome.  INCREASED the fame and legend.

They most certainly did act as a flood and they literally overflown any that were trying to threaten any of their territory and then some.

And the next bit of prophecy…

Dan 11:22  'And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him, and shall be broken; yea, also the prince of the covenant.'

Without any doubt this was fulfilled perfectly.

Who is the prince of the covenant?  OUR SAVIOR!

Was our Savior broken before Tiberius' reign?  Yes.

'Tiberius (Latin: Tiberius Julius Caesar Augustus;[1] November 16, 42 BC – March 16, AD 37), was Roman Emperor from 14 AD to 37 AD.'
Pasted from  

Our Savior died in 31 AD we've proven that already beyond a doubt.   Tiberius was ruler until 37 AD.

Our Savior was broken- our Savior was KILLED under the reign of this man just as prophecy predicted!!!!

By the grace of God may we continue to follow history and watch prophecy unfold!

It's only through the love of our Savior, only through His mercy, His grace, His forgiveness, His righteousness that we can hope, all our hope is in HIM now and forever!!!

Please Lord lead us, Please Lord guide us! Please Lord give us all we need to understand all that you would have us understand, not by our wisdom, not by anything we possess at all whatsoever, but all by YOU!  For Your honor, Your glory, for You, for YOU Lord, our Creator, our Savior!


Amen.