1980 Sep
-- XIII-- 9(80) -- THE WITNESS OF JESUS --
Rev 12:17 And
the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of
her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the TESTIMONY OF JESUS
CHRIST.
Rev 19:10 And
I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I
am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the TESTIMONY OF JESUS:
worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.
Rev 1:2 Who
bare record of the word of God, and of the TESTIMONY OF JESUS CHRIST, and of
all things that he saw.
Rev 1:9 I
John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the
kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos,
for the word of God, and for TESTIMONY OF JESUS CHRIST.
Rev 20:4 And I
saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I
saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the WITNESS OF JESUS, and for the
word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither
had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived
and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
The Adult
Sabbath School Lessons for the Second Quarter, 1980, were written by Dr. Jean
Zurcher, Secretary of the Euro-Africa Division, and entitled - "The
Witness of Jesus." This title derived from Scripture has a special
restricted meaning to Seventh-day Adventists when the translation as found in
the KJV is used.
The phrase
is found SIX times in the book of Revelation, and we use two of those times in
a very specialized sense. In these two references - 12:17 & 19:10 - the KJV
translates the Greek as "the testimony of Jesus" and declares this
"testimony" to be "the spirit of prophecy."
The other
references in the book of Revelation are 1:2; 1:9; 19:10 - used twice - and
20:4. Its first use, and therefore its primary meaning, is connected with the
revelation which God gave to Jesus to reveal things which must shortly come to
pass.
John bore
record of this word of God, and witness of Jesus ["testimony of
Jesus" - KJV] and the things which he saw which revealed that word and
witness. The word of God and the witness of Jesus constituted "the words
of this prophecy" which if read and heard, a blessing follows. (Rev. 1:3)
The witness of Jesus is simply in its fullest sense the unfolding of the
prophetic word - the spirit and living force of prophecy, God's evaluation of
history to be.
This
prophecy and its execution has been placed in the hands of the covering
cherubim. It was Gabriel, who took Lucifer's place, who revealed to Daniel that
he would show him "that which is noted in the scripture of truth" and
there was no one who held with him "in these things, but Michael your
prince." (Dan. 10:21)
Dan 10:21 But
I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is
none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince.
To the word and testimony of the prophets,
Jesus appealed in justification of Himself as the Messiah. To the two on the
way to Emmaus, Jesus said - "Behoved it not the Christ [Messiah] to suffer
these things, and to enter into His glory? And beginning from Moses and from
all the prophets, He interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things
concerning Himself." (Luke 24:27 RV)
The very
spirit or essence of prophecy is the witness to Jesus, and Jesus in turn
witnesses to us, the purpose of God through prophecy. To this sure word of
prophecy the witness of Jesus - we need to heed, for it is a 1ight that shines
amid the gross darkness that is covering the earth till the true Day Star - the
Sun of righteousness - comes without sin unto salvation.
Zurcher,
not only wrote the Sabbath School lessons, but also a book which paralleled the
weekly lessons. This book - Christ
of the Revelation - was published by the Southern Publishing
Association. In it he calls attention to a key sign which Jesus prophesied -
witnessed to - which relates to this our own time, and reveals to us God's word
and purpose. We dare not forget that Jesus was foretold to be that
"Prophet" whom the Lord would raise up, and in Whom He would place
His words, which if not heeded, God would hold that person accountable. Of this
p
2 -- prophecy of Jesus - words which God placed in His mouth Zurcher
wrote: We
shall not linger over the numerous signs given by Jesus in this discourse.
[Matthew 24; Mark 13; Luke 21] One only will occupy our attention, the one that
especially deals with time. Even in our days it constitutes a critical point in
the political world: Jerusalem. In fact, Jerusalem is both the beginning and
the culmination of Jesus' prophecy. For Him, as for Daniel the prophet, the
history of nations, as that of the people of Israel, is written in the setting
of the tragic history of Jerusalem. The latter is the sign by which the fate of
the former is determined. So having predicted the destruction of Jerusalem and
the dispersion of the Jews ''into all nations," Jesus declared,
''Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the
Gentiles be fulfilled.'' (Luke 21:24)
Few today would deny
the precision of this prophecy. The destruction of Jerusalem by the Roman
armies in AD 70 is a historical fact commemorated on the triumphal arch of
Titus in Rome. The dispersion of the Jews among all nations is still a reality.
As for Jerusalem, nineteen centuries of history should provide adequate proof
that it has been " trodden down of the GentiIes" - first by the
Romans, then by the Arabs, next by different Christian nations during the
Crusades, fourth by the Turks up to the end of the first world war, then by the
British, and finally by the Jordanians until the Six-Day War in June, 1967.
This prophecy of Jesus
was a sign for the Christians of the Apostolic Church, who lived at the
beginning of the times of the Gentiles, and it remains a sign for us who Iive
at the end of the times of the Gentiles. Again, we must know how to discern its
meaning.
It is not a matter of
our seeing in the return of the Jews to Palestine and in the Israeli conquest
of Jerusalem a sign of the approaching conversion of the Jews, as so many
Christians think. Nothing in Jesus' prophecy allows such an interpretation.
However, if we cannot see that Jerusalem is an exceptional sign of the times,
then might we not be placing ourselves in the same position as the religious
leaders who knew how to "discern the face of the sky'' but could not
discern the obvious "signs of the times''?
In order for us to
understand Jesus' statement, three questions need answering.
First, what exactly
does the expression '' the times of the Gentiles'' mean?
Then, what should be
understood by the fulfillment of the times of the Gentiles?
Finally, what
connection is there between the retaking of Jerusalem by the Jews and the
fulfillment of the times of the Gentiles?
As I understand the
Biblical language, the times of the Gentiles is the period set aside by God for
the evangelization of the heathen nations. It is not the time needed for them
to be converted to Christianity, as some think, but for them to hear the gospel.
It is in this sense that Jesus said: ''This gospel of the kingdom shall be
preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the
end come." (Matt. 24:14)
p
3 -- I beIieve that the times of
the Gentiles began in AD 34, when the prophetic seventy weeks that God set
aside for the people of Israel ended. The baptism of the first ''heathens"
- the Ethiopian eunuch and the centurion Cornelius - as well as the conversion
of Paul as the apostle to the Gentiles mark the beginning of these new times
when the gospel would be preached to the nations. And if I have understood the
prediction of Jesus properly, this time will be "fulfilled'' when
Jerusalem will cease to '' be trodden down of the Gentiles."
The fact that since
1967 Gentiles no longer have occupied Jerusalem means, therefore, that we are
now living at the end of '' the times of the Gentiles.''
Jerusalem
here constitutes the last sign of the times by which the Lord shows us that the
history of this world is coming to its climax and that the restoration of all
things is at hand. (pp. 71-72, Emphasis
his)
This
position of Dr. Zurcher is in sharp contrast with the dogma expressed by Dr.
Herbert Douglass at the 1974 North American Bible Conferences who was adhering
to the line of the hierarchy. Douglass unequivocally stated - "Adventists
do not see theological importance in the establishment of the Jewish state in
1948 or the annexation of Old Jerusalem in 1967." ("Adventist
Eschatology," p. 6)
This
combing of two distinct events, though related, only serves to confuse the
issue. Jesus did not talk about a Jewish state in His prophecy, only the city which
was to be surrounded and destroyed by alien armies. It is also interesting to
observe that when the editors of the Adventist Review began a new feature in their
journal - "Books in Review" - the first book to be reviewed was
Zurcher's - Christ of the Revelation. Dr. Kenneth Strand of Andrews University, the reviewer,
noted the section which we have quoted above with this comment - "Two
pages are devoted to the interpretation of the expression, 'until the times of
the Gentiles are fulfilled' of Luke 21:24, but probably few Adventist readers
will concur with Dr. Zurcher's personal viewpoint that this period terminated
in the events of the six-day war in 1967." (May 29, 1980, p. 19)
This is a
sad comment on the level to which the members of the church have sunk in their
desire and ability to study and to know for themselves the truth as revealed in
the witness of Jesus. If the presentation of Dr. Zurcher is merely a matter of
his "personal viewpoint" that is one thing, but if it is a valid
exegesis of the prophecy that Jesus Himself gave, it is tragically
freighted with eternal consequences, and too vital to ignore.
What if
someone, calling attention to the fact that alien armies had surrounded the
city of Jerusalem in 66 AD, was brushed off with the comment that this is
merely Brother Agabus' "personal viewpoint"!
The
disciples of Jesus are those only who "continue in [His] word." (John
8:31) Not a Christian perished in the seige of Jerusalem in AD 70, but this is
not saying how many professed Christians died because they chose to ignore the
literalism of Jesus' prophecy.
What Dr.
Zurcher has written needs more than merely a passing comment in a Book Review.
He clearly points out that this prophecy of Jesus - the witness of Jesus
"was a sign for the Christians of the Apostolic Church . . . and it
remains a sign for us who live at the end of the times of the Gentiles."
What if
some editor of the Apostolic Church had written - "The Church sees no
importance or significance in the approach of the armies of Rome against the
city of Jerusalem, because Jerusalem is no longer the chosen city of God, nor
Israel of the flesh, His people.
p 4
-- We must remember there has been a change from a literal Israel as the
chosen of God to a new spiritual Israel, and therefore, we must interpret in a
symbolic manner this prophecy of Jesus." But with 20/20 vision we clearly
perceive past history. We say emphatically that the surrounding of the literal,
ancient city of Jerusalem by Roman armies was verily the sign that Jesus gave
by which Christians were to know the time had arrived to flee from its midst.
But now in our Laodicean blindness, we perceive not the hour of our visitation!
As Zurcher
so honestly suggests - "If we cannot see that Jerusalem is an exceptional
sign of the times, then might we not be placing ourselves in the same position
as the religious leaders who knew how to 'discern the face of the sky' but
could not discern the obvious 'signs of the times.'"
Zurcher
contends that to understand Jesus' prophecy, "three questions need
answering." Let us observe these three questions, and Zurcher's
answers.
1) "What
exactly does the expression "the times of the Gentiles' mean?" To
this he answers - "The times of the Gentiles is the period set aside
by God for the evangelization of the heathen nations."
2) "What
should be understood by the fulfillment of the times of the Gentiles?" His
answer is - "This time will be 'fulfilled' when Jerusalem will cease to be
'trodden down of the Gentiles.'" And
3) "What
connection is there between the retaking of Jerusalem by the Jews and the
fulfillment of the times of the Gentiles?" Zurcher's answer to this third
question is simply the acceptance of the historical facts of life - "The
fact that since 1967 Gentiles no longer have occupied Jerusalem means,
therefore, that we are living at the end of 'the times of the Gentiles.'"
If it were
only the last two questions involved, the majority of Adventists would not find
it too difficult to see light in this prophecy or witness of Jesus. But that
first question, which leads to a basic fourth question is the stumbling block.
If the "times of the Gentiles" is that period set aside by God for
the evangelization of the heathen nations, and that time is up, what then is
God saying to us to whom He committed the last message of salvation to the
world in the Three Angels' Messages of Revelation 14, which was to go to every
nation? Zurcher points out and rightly so - "this period, the times of the
Gentiles, is not the time needed for them to be converted to Christianity, as
some think, but for them to hear the gospel."
Then he
quotes Matthew 24:14 which reminds us that al1 that Jesus said was the Gospel
was to be preached "for a witness unto all nations; and the shall the end
come." If then the preaching of the Gospel as a witness has been
completed, how valid is all the evangelistic promotion? Does it not then serve
only as a propaganda instrument by which to cement the ever widening crevices
appearing in the church body so that the hierarchy can still maintain their
control of the structure? Are we not because of all the evangelism emphasis
diverting the attention of God's people from heaven's revelation of how God
looks at the present world situation, and what He is about to do? For the
leadership thus to continue to mislead God's heritage will in the ultimate
bring a heavy retribution of Divine Judgment.
But
then, what did Jesus mean, when He said "then shall the end come"?
Have we not always understood the end to be the close of probation? But has not
the "witness of Jesus" - the testimony of Jesus given us some
enlightenment even on this vital point? Read carefully:
"After
the truth has been proclaimed as a witness to all nations, [Does it say, that probation will
close, and Jesus will come in the clouds of heaven?] every conceivable power of evil will be set in
operation, and minds will be confused. Then there will be a removing of
the landmarks, and an
p
5 -- attempt to tear down the
pillars of our faith." (R&H, Dec. 13,
1892) One has to be
totally blind not to see where we are in the stream of time. If since 1967,
there has not been an attempt at removing the pillars of our faith, I am at a
loss for words to adequately describe what has been done and is being done in
this regard.
Following
the great evangelistic witness of the 40's and early 50's, the leadership of
the Church condoned the sell-out of the basic historic truths committed to our
trust in the Seventh-day Adventist Evangelical Conferences of 1955-1956. By
imposing the denial of basic commitments of the Advent Movement on the church,
the leadership betrayed their trust as guardians of the spiritual interests of
the people, and God permitted prophecy to be fulfilled. In this fulfilled
prophecy He is telling all who will listen that the hierarchy of the church is
no longer capable of rightly representing the truth, and therefore, He has
removed from them the trust He had committed into their hands. By calling an
end to the period of the evangelization of the nations, God has ordered that
"the last work," "the closing work for the church" be set
in operation. (See3T:266)
But
as Dr. Strand says - "few Adventist readers will concur." They would
rather take the position of the Jewish people of old who faced the end of their
times as guardians of a sacred trust, and defy earth and heaven "to
dispossess them of their rights" as "the children of Abraham."
They "cherished the idea that they were the favorites of heaven, and that
they were always to be exalted as the church of God." (COL., p. 294) What God has said in the
fulfillment of the witness of Jesus is abhorrent to the vast majority of the
professed people of God, just as were the words of John the Baptist prior to
"the coming of Christ" as the Messiah to His professed people of that
hour. John cried out: 0 generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the
wrath to come? Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not
to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you,
That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham. And now the
axe is laid unto the root of the trees: every tree therefore which bringeth not
forth fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. (Luke 3:7-9)
LESSONS
FROM THE PAST -- During His ministry, Jesus told His disciples of the
immediate future, and what was to transpire. He was to "suffer many things
of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again
the third day." (Matt. 16:21) However, when these events did occur, the
minds of the disciples became so confused; their hopes crushed that they did
not remember nor understand the prophecy of Jesus that He would rise again the
third day. They doubted even the testimony of those to whom Christ appeared
following His resurrection. Why? "The news of Christ's resurrection was so
different from what they had anticipated, that they could not believe it. It
was too good to be true, they thought. They had heard so much of the doctrines
and the so-called scientific theories of the Sadducees,
p 6
-- that the impression made on their minds in regard to the resurrection
was vague. They scarcely knew what the resurrection from the dead could mean.,
They were unable to take in the great subject." (Desire of Ages, p. 793)
Jesus
has given prophecies that pertain to this our own day, the chief example of
which is Luke 21:24 - "Jerusalem shall be trodden down ... until the times
of the Gentiles be fulfilled." It is just as clear, as the prophecies
which marked the fall of Jerusalem, and the approach to the end of the
prophetic period of the 2300 Days - the alien armies surrounding the city, the
Dark Day, and the Falling of the Stars. Not one word of what Christ foretold
has failed of fulfillment. Yet we stumble, and doubt the meaning of the last
great sign. Why? It involves the Church, as dear to us as was the Temple to the
Jews. And we have so long listened to the hierarchy tell us what the church is,
that we have become confused in our thinking even as the disciples concerning
the resurrection. We have been presented a series of Ellen G. White statements
arranged to fit the objective of the prelates of power. In reading these
statements we fail to understand the context in which it was written, and some
of the prophetic statements made by the same author, plus her quotes from the
divine "Instructor." The hierarchy would have you believe that the
Church is going through, just as the Sadducees of Christ's day would have the
laity believe that there was no resurrection. But these modern Sadducees do not
tell you Sister White warned in 1903: In the balances of the sanctuary
the Seventh-day Adventist church is to be weighed. She will be judged by the
privileges and advantages that she has had. If her spiritual experience does
not correspond to the advantages that Christ, at infinite cost, has bestowed on
her, if the blessings conferred have not qualified her to do the work entrusted
to her, on her wiII be pronounced the sentence, "Found wanting." By
the light bestowed, the opportunities given, will she be judged. (8T:247)
Can anyone
produce a series of statement prepared by the hierarchy on the Church going
through, where they quote the above? To clear our minds from the foggy thinking
we have been subjected to by the hierarchy, let us ask ourselves some
forthright questions, and be willing to give some honest answers. If the Church
- the corporate body - is going through to the Kingdom, then why should the
Church be subject to the judgment of the sanctuary? Is an irrevocable fact
subject to judgment with the possibility of being revoked? The very fact that
God has determined that the Seventh-day Adventist Church is to be weighed in
the balances of the sanctuary should tell us that there is a question on its
going through. Unless certain conditions set by heaven are met in the
investigation, the sentence will be pronounced "Found Wanting!"
Further,
the propaganda machine works overtime in the curia's on the Sligo to convince
you that for you to recognize apostasy in the church, and to speak out against
it, is to call the church, Babylon.
A series of quotations are produced written in
1893 - ten years prior to the above quotation - that to call or infer that the
church is Babylon is the work of the devil. It becomes almost an over-mastering
delusion. In the same testimony written in 1903, the servant of the Lord quoted
the divine "Instructor" as asking - "How is the faithful city
become a harlot?" (8T:250)
It is saying simply that the Church was once "the faithful city;"
this no one can deny. She has carried the truth of the downtrodden Sabbath
p 7
-- to the ends of the earth; she has proclaimed that Christ in the
performance of His mission took upon Himself the seed of Abraham according to
the flesh; she has proclaimed that Christ began in 1844, His final atonement in
behalf of the dead and the living. But because she did, does this mean that God
will overlook the apostasy and departure from truth which became so marked in
the Seventh-day Adventist Evangelical Conferences of 1955-1956? She played the
harlot in basking in the approbation of Babylon, and denying basic, historical
Adventist teaching to do so. Not only this in 1955-1956, but now in 1980 - this
our very day - she has continued her departure from truth by making provision
with the voted Statement of Beliefs to meet the basic requirements doctrinally
for membership in the World Council of Churches. Has not God taken into account
these things? Or are we saying - "The Lord will not do good, neither will
He do evil. He is too merciful to visit His people in judgement." (5T:211) When God by fulfilled prophecy
says the times of the Gentiles or nations are up, He is saying the trust to
give the final gospel warning to those nations has been altered. A faithful
city that becomes a harlot cannot give the trumpet the correct, nor right
sound!
Another
lesson comes from the events associated with Calvary. "From the
crucifixion to the resurrection many sleepless eyes were constantly searching
the prophecies, some to learn the full meaning of the feast they were
celebrating, some to find evidence that Jesus was not what He claimed to be;
and others with sorrowful hearts were searching for proofs that He was the true
Messiah. Though searching with different objects in view, all were convicted of
the same truth, - that prophecy had been fulfilled in the events of the past
few days, and that the Crucified One was the world's Redeemer." (DA, p. 775) These who were thus
studying were not seeking to develop a theology of the atonement, that would
come later. They were searching the prophecies so they could understand the
events which had transpired before their own eyes. Many who so studied understood
what the death of Christ actually meant to the Jewish ceremonial services, and
these, obedient to the light which prophecy revealed, acted accordingly. It
says - "Many who at that time united in the services never again took part
in the paschal rites." (Ibid)
Prophecy had been fulfilled. They asked the meaning of what God was saying in
the events of Calvary, and having perceived, they acted out their faith.
God has
again spoken to us in prophecy - a prophecy of Jesus. It was a sign to the
Christians of the Apostolic Church, who lived at the beginning of the times of
the Gentiles, and it has become also a sign to us who are now living at the end
of the times of the Gentiles. How many today have the courage to act out what
this prophecy is telling us? Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be
saved. To believe on Him is to accept His word. Jesus said, "If ye
continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the
truth, and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:31-32) The Jerusalem
which now is, is in bondage with her children, "but the Jerusalem which is
above is free, which is the mother of us all." (Gal.4:25-26) "But ye
are come unto Mount Zion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly
Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, to the general assembly and
church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven." (Heb. 12:22-23)
"The state of the
Church represented by the foolish virgins, is also spoken of as the Laodicean
state." (R&H,
August 19, 1890)