Sacred Sabbath.

 

(Excerpt)

CHAPTER II. SABBATH OF THE LAW

As a basis for the further notice of “The Abiding Sabbath,” we shall here give some extracts from the author’s discussion of the fourth commandment, showing the universal and everlasting obligation of the seventh day as the Sabbath of the Lord. He says:— 

“The giving of the law at Sinai is the loftiest landmark in the history of Israel. It is the beginning of their civil and religious polity. From that moment Israel became the nation of Jehovah, the nation of the law, the leader among the nations of the earth in the search after a positive righteousness. That the Sabbath is a part of that code, has therefore a meaning not for the Hebrew alone, but for the whole race of mankind. 

“Everywhere in the sacred writings of the Hebrews they are reminded that they are the people peculiarly guided by Providence. Historian, psalmist, and prophet never tire in recounting the marvelous interpositions of Jehovah in behalf of his chosen people. And this thought is the key-note to the decalogue, ‘I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage’ 

(Exodus 20:2), is the introduction to the law. When therefore the Sabbath is introduced into the decalogue, while its old significance as a testimony of creation is not lost, but especially recalled, it becomes, beside, a monument of the divine Providence whose particular manifestations Israel, among the nations, has most largely experienced. The Sabbath of the law is the Sabbath of Providence. 

“The declaration on Sinai is perhaps the strongest attestation which the Sabbatic ordinance has received. It is henceforth based upon an express command of God himself, is given in circumstances of the most impressive solemnity, and has received the awful sanction of embodiment in the moral law, against which ‘the soul that sinneth, it shall die.’ Ezekiel 18:4. God has spoken, and his creatures must obey or perish. 

“We commonly speak of the decalogue as the ‘ten commandments.’ A more precise rendering of the Hebrew terms would be the ‘ten words’ (Exodus 34:28, margin; Deuteronomy 4:13; 10:2, 4, margin), an exact equivalent of which we have taken from the Greek, in the word ‘decalogue.’ These statutes are therefore not simply commands or precepts of God, for God may give commandments which have only a transient and local effect; they are in a distinctive sense the word of God, an essential part of that word which ‘abideth.’ In the decalogue we get a glimpse of that inner movement of the divine will which is the permanent foundation for all temporary ordinances. It is not contended that this use of language is rigidly uniform, but only that by the phrase, ‘the ten words,’ as well as in the general scope of Hebrew legislation, the moral law is fully distinguished from the civil and ceremonial law. The first is an abiding statement of the divine will; the last consists of transient ordinances having but a temporary and local meaning and force. The decalogue is also called the ‘testimony’ (Exodus 25:16 and in many other places), that is, the witness of the divine will; also the words of the ‘covenant’ (34:28), and ‘his (i. e., Jehovah’s) covenant’ (Deuteronomy 4:13), upon obedience to which his favor was in a special manner conditioned. The names given to this code declare its unchanging moral authority. 

“The manner in which this law was given attests its special sanctity and high authority. Before its announcement, the people of Israel, by solemn rites, sanctified themselves, while the holy mountain was girded with the death-line which no mortal could pass and live. When the appointed day came, to the sublime accompaniment of pealing thunders and flashing lightnings, the loud shrilling of angel-blown trumpets, the smoking mountain, and the quaking earth, from the lips of Jehovah himself sounded forth ‘with a great voice’ the awful sentences of this divine law, to which in the same way ‘he added no more.’ Deuteronomy 5:22. Not by the mouth of an angel or prophet came this sublimest code of morals, but the words were formed in air by the power of the Eternal himself. And when it was to be recorded, no human scribe took down the sacred utterances; they were engraved by no angel hand; but with his own finger he inscribed on tables of stone, whose preparation, in the first instance, was ‘the work of God,’ the words of his will. Exodus 31:18; 32:16; 34:1, 4, 28. 

“The law declared by his own mouth and indited by his own hand was finally placed in the ark of the covenant, underneath the mercy-seat, where sprinkled blood might atone for its violation; .. and beneath the flaming manifestation of the very presence of the Almighty, the glory of the shekinah; circumstances signifying forever the divine source of this law and the divine solicitude that it should be obeyed. This superior solemnity and majesty of announcement and conservation distinguish the decalogue above all other laws given to man, and separate it widely from the civil polity and ritual afterwards given by the hand of Moses. These latter are written by no almighty finger and spoken to the people by no divine voice; for these it is sufficient that Moses hear and record them. 

“Of the law thus impressively given, the fourth commandment forms a part. Amid the same cloud of glory, the same thunders and lightnings, uttered by the same dread voice of the Infinite One, and graven by his finger, came forth these words as well: ‘Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy.’ It is impossible, in view of these facts, to class the Sabbath with the ceremonial institutions of Israel. By the sacred seal of the divine lip and finger, it has been raised far above those perishing rites. In other words, it belongs to that moral law which Paul calls ‘holy, and just, and good’ (Romans 7:12), and not that ritual law of which Peter declares, ‘Neither our fathers nor we were able to bear’ it. Acts 15:10. 

“Nothing can be found in the form of words in which the fourth commandment is expressed which indicates that it is less universal in its obligation or less absolute in its authority than the other nine with which it is associated.... But it is sometimes claimed that this is simply a Mosaic institute, and therefore of transient force; that this has not, like the others, an inward reason which appeals to the conscience; that it is, in short, not a moral but a positive precept... 

“The proof which would exclude this commandment from the throne of moral authority on which the others are seated should amount to demonstration.... The distinction cannot be maintained between this commandment and the remainder of the decalogue. The prohibition of image-worship is not deemed essential by either Roman or Greek Christianity; but the more spiritual mind of Protestantism can see that this law is absolutely necessary to guard a truly spiritual conception of Deity. So, many excellent Christians have failed to discern the moral necessity of the Sabbath. Clearer insight will reveal that all the laws of the first table are guarded by this institution, as all in the second table are enforced by the tenth, ‘Thou shalt not covet.’ 

Abiding Sabbath.

 • (EXCERPT)

THE ABIDING SABBATH

CHAPTER I. INSTITUTION OF THE SABBATH

The late Hon. Richard Fletcher, of Boston, Mass., by his last will, established in charge of the trustees of Dartmouth College, “a fund from the income of which they were to offer, once in two years, a prize of $500 for the essay best adapted” to counteract “the numerous and powerful influences constantly active in drawing professed Christians into fatal conformity with the world, both in spirit and practice.” 

The fifth time of offering the prize fell in 1883. Accordingly the trustees of the fund and of Dartmouth College selected as the “specific theme” of the desired essay, “The Perpetual Obligation of the Lord’s Day,” and offered the five-hundred-dollar prize for the best. 

The committee of award was composed of the following gentlemen: “Prof. William Thompson, D. D., Prof. Llewellyn Pratt, D. D., and Rev. George M. Stone, D. D., all of Hartford, Conn.” This committee, “after a careful and thorough examination,” awarded the prize to an essay which proved to have been written by the Rev. George Elliott, of West Union, Iowa. The essay, entitled “The Abiding Sabbath,” appeared in 1884, and was issued from the press of the American Tract Society in the winter of 1884-85, in the form of a book of two hundred and eighty pages. …

The book is divided into three parts,—“Sabbath of Nature,” “Sabbath of the Law,” and “Sabbath of Redemption.” We shall quote quite largely from the first two parts, and that without argument, there being in fact no room for argument between us, because the author of “The Abiding Sabbath,” in these two parts, proves to perfection the perpetual obligation of the seventh day as the Sabbath, and that is exactly what we believe. We ask our readers to study carefully his argument on the “Sabbath of Nature” and the “Sabbath of the Law,” which we quote, (1) because it is excellent reading, and (2) because we want them to see clearly, by what curious freaks of logic it is, that after absolutely demonstrating the perpetual obligation of the seventh day, another day entirely is to be observed. He says most truly:— 

“The Sabbath is an institution as old as the completion of the world.... It shares with marriage the glory of being the sole relics saved to the fallen race from their lost paradise. One is the foundation of the family, and consequently of the State; the other is equally necessary to worship and the church. These two fair and fragrant roses man bore with him from the blighted bliss of Eden. 

“It is not, however, the mere fact of age that lends sacredness to these institutions; for years alone cannot give consecration or compel regard to anything which does not possess in itself some inherent sanctity and dignity. It is in the circumstances of its first institution, and in its essential character, that we must hope to discover the necessity and holiness of the Sabbath day. 

“‘God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it, because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made.’ Genesis 2:3. Such is the sublimely simple statement which forms the last strain of that magnificent hymn of creation which is our only glimpse into the beginning of things. It is surely consistent with sound common sense and sound interpretation to see in these words much more than a mere anticipation of the theocratic Sabbath of Israel. It seems absurd to express in words what some have implied in their reasonings on this passage: ‘God rested on the seventh day; therefore 2,500 years afterwards he blessed and sanctified it.’ The same form of language is used to describe what took place on the seventh day as in relating what took place in the six preceding days. 

“It is certain that a first reading of this passage conveys to the mind the idea that the sanctification of the Sabbath as a day of rest took place at the very close of the creative week. That such was the case would probably never have been denied, if the denial had not been necessary to support a peculiar view. Doubt in regard to this proleptic interpretation is sustained by the recent discovery of mention of a day of rest in the Assyrian account of creation, which is believed to antedate Moses by nearly six hundred years, and the further discovery of the actual observance of a Sabbath in Babylonia long before the time of the Mosaic institution. Is not God saving his facts, in Egyptian tombs, on Assyrian bricks, and in all historic remains everywhere, that, at every crisis of his truth, when even the mouths of believers are silenced by the tumult of doubt, the very ‘stones’ may ‘cry out’? ...

“A special authority attaches itself to the primitive revelation. Whatever critical opinions may assert concerning the early history of the world, to the Christian the testimony of Jesus Christ remains in force to the high obligation of the Edenic law. In reproving the corruptions of the marriage relation which had arisen under the Mosaic code, he reverts to the primitive law: ‘From the beginning it was not so.’ That is to say, the law of the beginning is supreme. Whatever institutions were given to man then were given for all time. There is given thus to marriage, and to its related institution, the Sabbath, a permanent character and authority which transcend the Hebrew legislation in their universal and binding force. Those elements of truth which were given to the infant race, are the possession of humanity, and not of the Jew alone; they are the alphabet of all the growing knowledge of man, not to be forgotten as the world grows old, but to be borne with him in all his wanderings, to last through all changes, and be his guide up those rugged steeps by which he must climb to the lofty summits of his nobler destiny. 

“Not to a single race, but to man; not to man alone, but to the whole creation; not to the created things alone, but to the Creator himself, came the benediction of the first Sabbath. Its significance extends beyond the narrow limits of Judaism, to all races, and perhaps to all worlds. It is a law spoken not simply through the lawgiver of a chosen people, but declared in the presence of a finished heaven and earth. The declaration in Genesis furnishes the best commentary on the saying of Jesus: ‘The Sabbath was made for man.’ For man, universal humanity, it was given with its benediction. 

“The reason of the institution of the Sabbath is one which possesses an unchanging interest and importance to all mankind. The theme of the creation is not peculiar to Israel, nor is worship of the Creator confined to the children of Abraham. The primary article of every religious creed, and the foundation of all true religion, is faith in one God as the Maker of all things. Against atheism, which denies the existence of a personal God; against materialism, which denies that this visible universe has its roots in the unseen; and against secularism, which denies the need of worship, the Sabbath is therefore an eternal witness. It symbolically commemorates that creative power which spoke all things into being, the wisdom which ordered their adaptations and harmony, and the love which made, as well as pronounced, all ‘very good.’ It is set as the perpetual guardian of man against that spiritual infirmity which has everywhere led him to a denial of the God who made him, or to the degradation of that God into a creature made with his own hands.” 

Further he says:— 

“While the reason remains, the law remains. The reason of the Sabbath is to be found in the fact of creation; it is God’s one monument set in human history to that great event; and so long as the truth of creation and the knowledge of a Creator have any value to human thought, any authority over the human conscience, or make any appeal to human affections, so long the law and the institution of the Sabbath will abide with lasting instruction and undiminished obligation. 

“God ‘rested the seventh day from all his work which he had made.’ Such is the record, declared in the beginning, embodied in the decalogue, and confirmed by the epistle to the Hebrews. It is a statement not to be easily understood at the first glance ‘Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard, that the everlasting God, the Lord, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary?’ Isaiah 40:28. If he is never weary how can we say of him that he rests? ...God is a Spirit, and the only rest which he can know is that supreme repose which only the Spirit can know—in the fulfillment of his purpose and the completeness as well as completion of his work. Just as, in the solemn pauses between the creative days, he pronounced his creatures ‘very good,’ so did he rejoice over the finishing of his work, resting in the perfect satisfaction of an accomplished plan; not to restore his wasted energy, as man rests, but to signify that in the coming of man the creative idea has found its consummation and crown. Such is the rest possible to a purely spiritual nature—the rest of a completed work.... 

“There is a still deeper sense in which the example of Deity reveals this obligation. Suppose the question to be asked, How can we know that any precept is moral in its meaning and authority, and not simply a positive and arbitrary command? What better answer could be given to this inquiry than to say that a moral precept must have the ground of its existence in the nature of God? Our highest conception of the moral law is to regard it as the transcript of his nature.... No more perfect vindication of the moral character of a law can be given than to show that it is a rule of the divine conduct; that it has been imposed upon his own activity by that infinite Will which is the supreme authority both in the physical and moral government of the universe. That law to which the Creator submits his own being must be of absolute binding force upon every creature made in his image. Such is the law of the Sabbath. ‘God rested the seventh day,’ and by so doing has given to the law of the Sabbath the highest and strongest sanction possible even to Deity. In no conceivable way could the Almighty so perfectly and with such unchallengeable authority declare, not simply his will in a positive institution, but the essentially moral character of the precept, as by revealing his own self-subjection to the rule which he imposes on his creatures.... Its obligation is addressed, not to man’s physical nature alone, but to man as a spiritual being, made in the image of God; it is laid, not only on his bodily powers and natural understanding, but upon his moral reason as right, and upon his conscience as duty. It is therefore bounded by no limits of time, place, or circumstance, but is of universal and perpetual authority.” 

Then he closes Chapter I of his book with the following most just conclusion:— 

“The Sabbath is therefore shown to be given in the beginning to all men; to have the lofty sanction of the example of God; to be rooted in the eternal world; to be the witness of the most important truths possible for man to know; to be a blessing to man’s nature; to inclose a duty of worship to God. By all these revealings which are given by the institution at its first ordainment, we are justified in believing that it has a moral meaning within it, and imposes upon all races and generations of men an unchanging and unrelaxed obligation of dutiful observance.” 

We have quoted more than half of the whole first chapter; but we have no apology to make. We honestly thank Mr. Elliott that he has given us so masterly a demonstration of the perpetual and universal obligation of the seventh day as the Sabbath of the Lord. Again we ask the reader to study it carefully; for it is a vindication of principles that are eternal, and that no ingenuity of man can undermine. ' (End Excerpt)

Spiritually Dressed Daily.

 I've never been a soldier, the closest I've come to a soldier in action is watching them in the movies or tv shows. Soldiers on active duty during wartime obviously have to prepare for their day differently than others. I can't imagine an active duty soldier not having any protective gear on, can you? A soldier who is going into war on the front lines wouldn't dream of going there without their bullet proof vests, their helmets, boots and so on and so forth. Why do Christian soldiers insist on going about their lives without armor? Sure, military soldiers can take leaves from war and go home, but Christian soldiers are on duty for life. Our armor is needed daily. And we need a DAILY consecration, a DAILY conversion to God, because we live in a very dangerous world- every day we have to commit our lives to God. Every day. God gives us our armor as we consecrate ourselves to Him. We can't produce the armor ourselves, not a single boot can we give to ourselves. We must daily, DAILY, submit ourselves to our LORD. 

(Excerpts)

'There is truth to be received if souls are saved. The keeping of the commandments of God is life eternal to the receiver. But the Scriptures make it plain that those who once knew the way of life and rejoiced in the truth are in danger of falling through apostasy, and being lost. Therefore there is need of a decided, daily conversion to God.'   (Faith I Live By EGW)

'Self-sufficiency blinds their eyes to their great need. There is a positive necessity for a daily conversion to God, a new, deep, and daily experience in the religious life.'  (Counsels On Health EGW)

'Let Us Ask of God.

If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. James 1:5. 

It is the privilege of every believer first to talk with God in his closet, and then as God's mouthpiece to talk with others. In order that we may have something to impart, we must daily receive light and blessing. Men and women who commune with God, who have an abiding Christ, who, because they cooperate with holy angels, are surrounded with holy influences, are needed at this time. The cause needs those who have power to draw with Christ, power to express the love of God in words of encouragement and sympathy. 

As the believer bows in supplication before God, and in humility and contrition offers his petition from unfeigned lips, he loses all thought of self. His mind is filled with the thought of what he must have in order to build up a Christlike character. He prays, “Lord, if I am to be a channel through which Thy love is to flow day by day and hour by hour, I claim by faith the grace and power that Thou hast promised.” He fastens his hold firmly on the promise, “If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, ... and it shall be given him.” 

How this dependence pleases the Master! How He delights to hear the steady, earnest pleading! ... With wonderful and ennobling grace the Lord sanctifies the humble petitioner, giving him power to perform the most difficult duties. All that is undertaken is done unto the Lord, and this elevates and sanctifies the lowliest calling. It invests with new dignity every word, every act, and links the humblest worker ... with the highest of the angels in the heavenly courts.... 

The sons and daughters of God have a great work to do in the world. They are to accept the Word of God as the man of their counsel and to impart it to others. They are to diffuse light. All who have received the engrafted word will be faithful in giving that word to others. They will speak the words of Christ. In conversation and in deportment they will give evidence of a daily conversion to the principles of truth. Such believers will be a spectacle to the world, to angels, and to men, and God will be glorified in them.

(Our Father Cares EGW)

 

Treasured Truths.

 Exo 20:4  Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 

Exo 20:5  Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; 

Exo 20:6  And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. 

Why not? Or rather, why? God gave ten royal laws, laws that were written in stone, unlike other laws given- ceremonial etc. God put only the ten royal laws into the Ark of the Covenant that was placed in the Most Holy Place of the Tabernacle and Temple.  To say the ten royal laws were held as special is truly an understatement of the fact it is of supreme importance. You do not place a treasure inside of a treasure box if it's meaningless, at least, not as a rule. Treasure boxes were to hold only treasure, while other boxes could contain things of much lesser importance. You don't build a safe with state of the art technology to put meaningly bric-a-brac inside. You build that safe to guide your precious, treasured possessions.  Banks and other financial institutions have safes because they hold the treasures of many. There are safe guards upon safe guards for things that are highly prized, we know this, we can be logically about this. Treasure, prized possessions- all are expected to be inside containers that can protect them.

The Ark of the Covenant was a treasure of God's.  The Ark contained the prized possessions of God. The Mercy Seat was over top of the prized possessions, the lid of the Ark. The Mercy Seat …

Exo_25:17  And thou shalt make a mercy seat of pure gold…

Exo_25:21  And thou shalt put the mercy seat above upon the ark; and in the ark thou shalt put the testimony that I shall give thee.

Exo_25:22  And there I will meet with thee, and I will commune with thee from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubims which are upon the ark of the testimony, of all things which I will give thee in commandment unto the children of Israel.

Exo_26:34  And thou shalt put the mercy seat upon the ark of the testimony in the most holy place.

Exo_30:6  And thou shalt put it before the vail that is by the ark of the testimony, before the mercy seat that is over the testimony, where I will meet with thee.

GOD WILL MEET WITH THEM THERE. GOD WILL COMMUNE WITH THEM FROM ABOVE THE MERCY SEAT.

The sheer enormity of that statement is mind-blowing. God, who no temple made with hands could contain. God, whose earth is His footstool. God chose a place to commune with mankind and that place was sacred. The testimony in the ark was of supreme importance- the ten royal laws and one of those laws was this one--

Exo 20:4  Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 

Exo 20:5  Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; 

Exo 20:6  And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. 

These laws were reinforced by Jesus, kept by Jesus and brought to life by Jesus, stripped down to their very core by Jesus. 

When we read that we are not to make ANYTHING to bow down to… GOD MEANS JUST THAT!  He did NOT want us to even bow down to the tabernacle, the ark, the altars, there was NO instruction to bow down to anything man made. Yet how many people find themselves even today bowing before altars, statues, crosses, buildings, candles, and the like? How many cry out, they do it to honor and show respect to God, but God has told them NOT to do it! They are calling EVIL - GOOD! They've convinced themselves beyond any doubt that it's harmless and good, a blessing, a reverence for Him, even as their mouths speak the words of worship towards this saint and that saint. GOD did NOT want us to worship ANY kind of image, not even His own- so He did not show Himself to mankind.  God is Spirit and we must worship Him in Spirit, not in things. We take away something vital that belongs to God alone, when we worship at the feet of things man creates. 

Satan has a huge storehouse filled with deceptions, in fact it's so huge we cannot fathom it's true size. Satan wants us to ultimately ignore God's truth and choose substitutions for that truth. When Christ comes for His people, many will cry out that they belong to Him, and He will tell them to depart from Him, that He never knew them and that will be the truth!  How shocked they are going to be by that pronouncement, yet they will know in that same instant as soon as the words leave the Savior's mouth, where they have erred. They won't be left with doubt for long. They'll know where and how they turned their backs on God's truth and accepted Satan's delusions instead.  PLEASE LORD WE DO NOT WANT TO BE AMONG THOSE WHO ARE DECEIVED! Please, Lord, KEEP US FROM EVIL! Please, Lord, please. 

(Excerpt)

'April 23, 1901

“The Keeping of the Commandments. The Second Commandment” Advent Review and Sabbath Herald 78, 17, pp. 264, 265.

“I AM the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. 

“Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.” Exodus 20:2, 4-6. 

As already stated, Gregory II was pope when the great controversy over the worship of images was raised, by the efforts in the East to abandon it. 

This pope Gregory made himself chief champion of the images and their worship. In 730 he wrote in defense of image of worship, to Emperor Leo the Isaurian who was trying to destroy the images. Since the cause of image worship prevailed, and was established as a part of Catholic faith, this letter of Pope Gregory II is important as giving the principles and arguments upon which that worship rests. 

To Emperor Leo, the pope wrote:— 

Ten years by God’s grace you have walked aright, and not mentioned the sacred images; but now you assert that they take the place of idols, and that those who reverence them are idolaters, and want them to be entirely set aside and destroyed. You do not fear the judgment of God, and that offense will be given not merely to the faithful, but also to the unbelieving. Christ forbids our offending even the least, and you have offended the whole world, as if you had not also to die and to give an account. 

You wrote. “We may not, according to the command of God (Exodus 20:4), worship anything made by the hand of man, nor any likeness of that which is in the heaven or in the earth. Only prove to me, who has taught us to worship (aibrothos kai procaunein) anything made by man’s hands, and I will then agree that it is the will of God.” But why have not you, O emperor and head of the Christians, questioned wise men on this subject before disturbing and perplexing poor people? You could have learnt from them concerning what kind of images made with hands cheiropoieta God said that. But you have rejected our Fathers and doctors, although you gave the assurance by your own subscription that you would follow them. The holy Fathers and doctors are our scripture, our light, and our salvation, and the six synods have taught us (that); but you do not receive their testimony. I am forced to write to you without delicacy or learning, as you also are not delicate or learned; but my letter yet contains the divine truth. 

God gave that command because of the idolaters who had the land of promise in possession and worshiped golden animals, etc., saying: “These are our gods, and there is no other God.” On account of these diabolical cheiropoieta, God has forbidden us to worship them.... Moses wished to see the Lord, but He showed himself to him only from behind. To us, on the contrary, the Lord showed himself perfectly, since the Son of God has been made man.... From all parts men now came to Jerusalem to see Him, and then depicted and represented Him to others. In the same way they have depicted and represented James, Stephen, and the martyrs; and men, leaving the worship of the devil, have venerated these images, but not absolutely (with latria), but relatively.... 

Why, then, do we make no representation of God the Father?—The divine nature can not be represented. If we had seen Him, as we have the Son, we could also make an image of Him. 

This is precisely the reason that the Lord gives in His word, as to why He allowed no manner of similitude to be seen. Read that word again: “Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the Lord spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure.” Deuteronomy 4:15, 16. 

Thus the Lord allowed no similitude to be seen, expressly that the people should make no image, and because the people were so idolatrous that, had they seen any similitude, they would certainly have made a graven image. 

Yet Pope Gregory II plainly says of God: “If we had seen Him, ... we could also make an image of Him.” 

This is only to say that he and those of that way are in heart as idolatrous as were the people at Sinai. 

Pope Gregory says also, “We have seen the Son,” and thus can make images of Him, and, “If we had seen God the Father, as we have the Son, we could also make an image of Him.” But since God allowed no similitude to be seen, “lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make a graven image,” and since this word of Pope Gregory’s shows that he and those of that way are as idolatrous as were those at Sinai,—this, then, shows that the use of images of Christ in the Catholic Church is as essentially idolatrous as was ever the use of any images in the world. 

Further, the pope wrote:— 

You say: “We worship stones and walls and boards.” But it is not so, O emperor; but they serve us for remembrance and encouragement, lifting our slow spirits upward by those (persons) whose names the pictures bear, and whose representation they are. And we worship them not as God, as you maintain; God forbid! For we set not our hope on them; and if a picture of the Lord is there, we say: Lord Jesus Christ, help and save us. At a picture of His Holy Mother, we say: Holy God-bearer, pray for us with thy Son; and so with a martyr.... It would have been better for you to have been a heretic than a destroyer of images. 

But that is only the argument of open pagan idolaters. They know that the image itself if not their god; they say only that the image represents the god; it serves to aid the mind in rising to the true idea and worship of the god, of which the image is the representative and remembrancer. 

The war against image worship continued till A.D. 789, when Irene came to power as the guardian of her son Constantine VI. She entered diligently upon the work of re-establishing image worship. 

She opened correspondence with Pope Hadrian I, who “exhorted her continually to this.” In his argument promotive of image worship the pope used Hebrews 11:21,—Jacob blessed both the sons of Joseph, and “worshiped upon the top of his staff,“—and made it support image worship by casting out the preposition, so that it should read, “worshiped the top of his staff.—Bower’s “Lives of the Popes,” Hadrian, par. 40. And so it reads in the Catholic Bible to-day. 

But since the image worship had been abolished by a general council, it was only by a general council that image worship could be doctrinally restored. It took considerable time to bring this about, so that it was not till 787 that the council was convened. 

This council, called also the seventh general council, was held at Nice, in Asia, especially for the prestige that would accrue to it by the name of the Second Council of Nice. It was held Sept. 24 to Oct. 23, A. D. 787. “The inconoclasts appeared, not as judges, but as criminals or penitents; the scene was decorated by the legates of Pope Adrian, and the Eastern patriarchs; the decrees were framed by the president, Tarasius, and ratified by the acclamations and subscriptions of three hundred and fifty bishops. They unanimously pronounced that the worship of images is agreeable to Scripture and reason, to the Fathers and councils of the Church.”—Gibbons, “Decline and Fall,” chap 49., par. 17. 

The closing words of the decree of the council are as follows:— 

We are taught by the Lord, the apostles, and the prophets, that we ought to honor and praise before all, the holy God-bearer, who is exalted above all heavenly powers; further, the holy angels, the apostles, prophets, and martyrs, the holy doctors, and all saints, that we may avail ourselves of their intercession, which can make us acceptable to God if we walk virtuously. Moreover, we venerate also the image of the sacred and life-giving cross and the relics of the saints, and accept the sacred and venerable images, and greet and embrace them, according to the ancient tradition of the holy Catholic Church of God, namely, of our holy Fathers, who received these images, and ordered them to be set up in all churches everywhere. These are the representations of our incarnate Saviour Jesus Christ, then of our inviolate Lady and quite holy God-bearer, and of the unembodied angels, who have appeared to the righteous in human form; also the pictures of the holy apostles, prophets, martyrs, etc., that we may be reminded by the representation of the original, and may be led to a certain participation in His holiness. 

This decree was subscribed by all present, even by the priors of monasteries and some monks. The two papal legates added to their subscription the remark that they received all who had been converted from the impious heresy of the enemies of images.—Hefele. The council was not content with this formal and solemn subscription. With one voice they broke out into a long acclamation, “We all believe, we all assent, we all subscribe. This is the faith of the apostles, this is the faith of the Church, this is the faith of the orthodox, this is the faith of the world. We, who adore the Trinity, worship images. Whoever does not the like, anathema upon him! Anathema on all who call images idols! Anathema on all who communicate with them who do not worship images! Anathema upon Theodorus, falsely called bishop of Ephesus; against Sisinnius, of Perga; against Basilius, with the ill-omened name! Anathema against the new Arius Nestorius and Dioscorus, Anastasius; against Constantine and Nicetas (the iconoclast patriarchs of Constantinople)! Everlasting glory to the orthodox Germanus, to John of Damascus! To Gregory of Rome everlasting glory! Everlasting glory to the preachers of truth!”—Milman, “History of Latin Christianity,” book iv, chap 8, par. 27. 

In the West, Pope Adrian I accepted and announced the decrees of the Nicene assembly, which is now revered by the Catholics as the seventh in rank of the general councils. For the honor of orthodoxy, at least the orthodoxy of the Roman Church, it is somewhat unfortunate that the two princes [Constantine and Irene] who convened the two councils of Nice, are both stained with the blood of their sons.—Gibbon, “Decline and Fall,” chap 49, par. 18. 

Thus it was that image worship was established as a part of the faith of the Catholic Church, and that it is as clearly idolatry as ever was anywhere, the whole record, as well as the Scripture, shows. '

God's Word Our Only Standard.

 The excerpts I've been studying of late are from the very early 1900's. In the studies right now they are studying the very early history of Christianity. They are talking about things leading up to the reformation, bits of history not often thought of any longer. History that we tend to acknowledge and then ignore. 

That old saying- that we are to remember history or we're doomed to repeat it, is often spouted.  There is another saying, ignoring truth doesn't make it any less truthful. 

Take out your favorite search engine and look up the Reformation and do a really good study on it all. Read about the large numbers of people willing to die for their faith, or rather wanting to return to the truth of the matter of faith. 

Some argue that people should be allowed to believe whatever they want, and guess what, they are allowed. They can believe and others can kill them for their beliefs, unfortunately. Right now, this very month, people have been killed for their beliefs. Being killed for believing is nothing new, most of the Apostles were martyrs- killed for their beliefs. 

Jesus NEVER advocated killing someone because they don't believe in Him. He did advocate dying for believing in Him, He died for us. The fact that there are those dying for believing in Jesus even today, is reality. 

Take God's word when you read things, such as these excerpts. When you read about people believing that we shouldn't worship idols, check that against your Bible. Find out where God's people are instructed to worship emblems, statues and so on and so forth. If you can't find where God has written such a thing, why do you do it then?  We need to find our answers in God's word, not in mankind's traditions. Do an honest study, don't accept beliefs blindly. Make an informed decision. You don't want to be worshiping in the ways of man, because when our Savior returns, He won't know you because you never really knew Him.  

God help us to only ever search for His truth in all things! May the Holy Spirit enlighten all who in sincerity of heart only want to follow their Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ our Lord now and forever! Amen. 

(Excerpt) 

April 16, 1901

“The Keeping of the Commandments. The Second Commandment” Advent Review and Sabbath Herald 78, 16, pp. 249, 250.

THE KEEPING OF THE COMMANDMENTS

The Second Commandment "I AM the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or, that is in the water under the earth: thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments." 

We have seen that from the days of Constantine to the end of the sixth century image worship had become universally established in the Catholic Church. Thus stood Catholic idolatry when, early in the seventh century, the Mohammedans swarmed up from the deserts of Arabia, executing judgment upon the " idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk." Rev. 9 : 20. " 

The triumphant Mussulmans, who reigned at Damascus and threatened Constantinople, cast into the scale of reproach the accumulated weight of truth and victory. The cities of Syria, Palestine, and Egypt had been fortified with the images of Christ, His mother, and His saints; and each city presumed on the hope or promise of miraculous defense. " 

In the rapid contest of ten years, the Arabs subdued those cities and these images;, and, in their opinion, the Lord of hosts pronounced a decisive judgment between the adoration and contempt of these mute and inanimate idols. 

In this season of distress and dismay the eloquence of the monks was exercised in the defense of images." 'Under the influence of the charge of idolatry, which the Mohammedans incessantly urged against the Catholics, some began to awake to the thought that perhaps the charge was true, and strongly desired the reformation of the Church. Besides these there were scattered throughout Christendom true Christians who constantly opposed, with the word of God 'and the example of primitive times, the worship of images. 

In a hundred years these influences had become so strong that Emperor Leo the Isaurian, in 727, ' took his stand, and issued an edict, against the worship of images: 'Opposition to this movement of the emperor's caused' the famous konoclastic Controversy, between the worshipers and the breakers of the images, which continued with bloody and unabated fury for one hundred and twenty years,— 726- 846,— and which finally resulted in the triumph of the worship of images, and the " religion of Constantine." The emperor ordered the images to be broken to pieces,- the walls of the churches to be whitewashed, and prosecuted with honest but imprudent vigor his design of extirpating idolatry. 

But a fierce dissension at once raged throughout all Christendom: the monks and the people arose in defense of their images and pictures, and the emperor, even in his own capital, was denounced as a heretic and a tyrant. There was an image of the Saviour, renowned for its miraculous powers, over the -gate of the imperial Palace called the Brazen Gate; from the rich tiles ,of gilt bronze that covered its magnificent vestibule. The emperor ordered the sacred figure to be taken down and broken to pieces. But the people from all parts of the City flew to the defense of their favorite idol, fell upon the officers; and put many of them -death. 

The women were even more violent than the men. Like furies they rushed to the spot, and, finding one of the soldiers engaged in the unhallowed labor at the top of the ladder, 'they pulled it down and tore him to pieces as he lay bruised upon the ground. "Thus,' exclaims the pious annalist, did the minister of the emperor's injustice fall at once from the top of the ladder to the bottom of hell.'

The women next flew to the great church, and finding the iconoclastic patriarch officiating at the altar, overwhelmed him with a shower of stones and a thousand opprobrious names. He escaped, bruised and fainting, from the building. The guards were now called out, and the female insurrection was suppressed; but not until several of the women had perished in the fray." 

"The execution of the imperial edicts was resisted by frequent tumults in Constantinople and the provinces; the person of Leo was endangered, his officers were massacred, and the popular enthusiasm was quelled by the strongest efforts of the civil and military power." 

In 728 the edict of the Eastern emperor abolishing "the worship of images was published in Italy. The pope defended the images, of course, and " the Italians Swore to live and die in defense of the pope and the holy images." And thus there was begun a war which, in its' nature and consequences, was in every 'sense characteristic of. the papacy. It established the worship of images, as' an article' of Catholic faith; it developed the supremacy of the pope in ' temporal affairs. When Leo's decree, against the worship of images was published in the West, "the images of Christ and the Virgin, of the angels, martyrs, and saints, were abolished in all the churches in Italy;" and the emperor threatened the pope that if he did not 'comply with the decree, he should be degraded and sent into exile. But the pope , Gregory II stood firmly for the worship of images, and sent pastoral letters throughout Italy, exhorting the faithful to do the same. 

"At this signal, Ravenna, Venice, dud the cities of the' exarchate and Pentapolis adhered to the cause of religious images ; their military force by sea and land consisted, for the most part, of the natives; and the spirit Of patriotism and zeal was transfused into the mercenary strangers. The Italians swore to live and die in the defense of the pope and the holy images. . . . The Greeks were overthrown and massacred, their leaders suffered an ignominious death, and the popes, however inclined to mercy, refused to intercede for these guilty victims." 

At Ravenna, A. D. 729, the riot and bloody, strife was so great that even the exarch, the personal representative of the emperor, was slain. " To punish this flagitious deed, and restore his dominion in Italy, the emperor sent a fleet and army into the Adriatic Gulf. 

After suffering from the winds and the waves much loss and delay, the Greeks made' their descent in the neighborhood of Ravenna. . . . In a hard-fought day, as the two armies alternately yielded and advanced,, a phantom was seen, a voice was heard, and Ravenna was victorious by the assurance of victory. The strangers retreated to their ships, but the populous seacoast poured forth a multitude of boats; the waters of the Po were so deeply infected with blood, 'that during six years the public prejudice abstained from the fish of the river; and the institution of an annual feast perpetuated the worship of images, and the abhorrence of the Greek tyrant. 

Amidst the triumph of the Catholic arms, the Roman pontiff convened a synod of ninety-three bishops against the heresy of the Iconoclasts. With their consent he pronounced a general excommunication against all who by word or deed should attack the traditions of the Fathers and the images of the saints." 

The establishment of the worship of images as an article of Catholic faith, will be related 'next week.'

Ever Look to God.

 Yesterday we talked a little about having object to remind us of God's Word, God's Commandments.  

Deu 6:4  Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: 

Deu 6:5  And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. 

Num 15:37  And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 

Num 15:38  Speak unto the children of Israel, and bid them that they make them fringes in the borders of their garments throughout their generations, and that they put upon the fringe of the borders a ribband of blue: 

Num 15:39  And it shall be unto you for a fringe, that ye may look upon it, and remember all the commandments of the LORD, and do them; and that ye seek not after your own heart and your own eyes, after which ye use to go a whoring: 

Num 15:40  That ye may remember, and do all my commandments, and be holy unto your God. 

Num 15:41  I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, to be your God: I am the LORD your God.

Were the children of Israel told to worship the blue ribboned fringes on the borders of their garments?

No. 

They were told that when they look at it they would REMEMBER.

They were told to put the blue ribbon with fringes on their clothes… clothes they wear every day, and when they would happen to look upon that blue ribbon and fringes they were to REMEMBER to do ALL God's commandments, and to be HOLY to God.

Reminders, not items to worship.

The clothes you wear, you see them constantly. I see my jeans and my tee-shirt, my shoes. None of my clothing is blue ribbon fringed. I mentioned yesterday that I wear tee-shirts with Jesus (Biblical) themes. I am reminded of God when I wear them. Because I wear them often it's odd to me when I don't have one on and it seems strange, because I have to admit, I try to be aware that I am representing my Lord when I visibly wear a shirt proclaiming as much. Do I need reminding, do I need to be aware of being a representative of Christ? I do, I'm so far from perfect, I really do. 

Is that what God wanted though? For those wearing the ribbons and fringes to be reminded to represent God, or to be reminded to do all God's commandments, to be Holy to God. 

Num 15:41  I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, to be your God: I am the LORD your God.

Perhaps a reminder that I'm representing the God I proclaim to represent by wearing my tee-shirts, is a reminder of God to me, because to represent Him I need to be reminded of Him. How others view my behavior in light of my proclamation means something. If I didn't wear my belief in God for all to see I have no reason to think that anyone would associate my scowling face with God. Yet, if I walk around with a scowl on my face and I love God on my tee shirt, clearly it may appear differently. Oh, I KNOW that Christians ARE not perfect, but forgiven, still… we need to put God first in all things and that does mean trusting in Him in all things. That means God brought me out of my sin life and into new life in Him- the former things of my life before Him are not to be treated as acceptable, but tragic temptations, tragic sins that easily beset me, tragic sins that need forgiveness and to be forsaken in repentance. 

You can tell by reading this that it truly is a personal study I'm undertaking. I'm searching just as many others are. I'm in this spiritual battle just as so many others are. My warfare is real, the weapons I have are those given to me by God- His Word is my sword. 

The fringes and ribbon reminders of our God… the ONE and ONLY GOD, the GOD THAT SAVES. OUR GOD who COMMANDS US. We ARE to remember that He commands us, our love, and He is love. 

We CANNOT worship anything other than GOD- not a single item we see are we to worship!

God alone is to be WORSHIPED. God alone!

Let us be reminded of GOD alone. No statue, no jewelry, no shirt, no building can replace GOD. We must find God in SPIRIT beyond all outward displays of any kind. No object I hold replaces GOD not even the written WORD, because Psa_119:11  Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee.  The word must be written in my heart! 

Joh_4:24  God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and truth.

I am not to worship the Bible, but the GOD who authored the Bible! The very same God who authored the Bible can bring any and all of the Bible to my mind if He so chooses. The word of God is there for me to read, praise God, but I am not to worship the Bible itself.  The Bible was burned by many and the tragedy of that was it was done to keep the words of truth from people. When the Bible was burned, God wasn't burned, He lives always! He is living truth! 

There are a lot of good things done with various things, but the things themselves should never be worshiped, never.

Let us ever look to GOD.  All by His grace and mercy, His love! 

(Excerpt)

April 9, 1901

“The Keeping of the Commandments. The Second Commandment” Advent Review and Sabbath Herald 78, 15, p. 232.

“I AM the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.

“Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.” 

We have seen that no similitude or likeness was seen on Sinai when God spoke His law, though there were many similitudes and likenesses there. We have seen that this was so, especially “lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image” or likeness. And thus in the Second Commandment there is forbidden, in the worship of God, the use of any similitude or likeness of any kind in any way whatever. 

Yet there are a great number of professed Christians who use images, similitudes, and likenesses in abundance in their professed worship of God. This is worth inquiring into. 

“This first introduction of a symbolic worship was in the veneration of the cross and of relics.”—Gibbons. In “honor” of Christ and the martyrs. 

And the first introduction of the cross as a visible symbol was by Constantine, and in the midst of that flood of evil that made the papacy. 

It is true that the sign of the cross was used as early as the days of Tertullian; but it was only a sign, made with a motion of the hand upon the forehead or breast. 

Constantine enlarged upon this by the introduction of the visible cross itself: in the Labarum. He erected in Rome his own statue, “bearing a cross in its right hand, with an inscription which referred the victory of his arms and the deliverance of Rome to that salutary sign, the true symbol of force and courage. 

“The same symbol sanctified the arms of the soldiers of Constantine; the cross glittered on their helmets, was engraved on their shields, was interwoven into their banners; and the consecrated emblems which adorned the person of the emperor himself were distinguished only by richer materials and more exquisite workmanship.” 

The Labarum was “a long pike intersected by a transversal beam,” forming a cross. “The silken veil which hung down from the beam was curiously inwrought with the images of the reigning monarch and his children. The summit of the pike supported a crown of gold, which inclosed the mysterious monogram, at once expressive of the figure of the cross and the initial letters of the name of Christ.” 

The basis of all this was the fiction and the imposture of Constantine’s “vision of the cross.” And from it “the Catholic Church, both of the East and of the West, has adopted a prodigy which favors, or seems to favor, the popular worship of the cross.” 

Under Constantine’s patronage also, “magnificent churches were erected by the emperor in Rome, adorned with images and pictures, where the bishop sat on a lofty throne, encircled by inferior priests, and performing rites borrowed from the splendid ceremonial of the pagan temple.”—Lawrence.

Pictures were used first. The introduction of these pictures was made under the plea that they were useful to instruct the ignorant, to awaken the cold, and to gratify the prejudices of the heathen proselytes. What some person imagined and produced as a picture of Christ, would be painted on the wall or window; and these people would gaze upon that, and sail away upon a sea of their own imagination. In this they thought they were contemplating Christ, and honoring Him, and indeed worshiping Him. But it was as sheer idolatry as ever was. They were only worshiping themselves, in their own imaginings. Never yet has there been made a picture of Christ. All that ever pretended to be such are only idolatrous imagings. 

Soon images were set up along with the pictures, and thus “by a slow, though inevitable, progression, the honors of the original were transferred to the copy; the devout Christian prayed before the image of a saint; and the pagan rites of genuflexion, luminiaries, and incense again stole into the Catholic Church. The scruples of reaon or piety were silenced by the strong evidence of visions and miracles; and the pictures which speak, and move, and bleed, must be endowed with a divine energy, and may be considered as the proper objects of religious adoration.” 

And thus “the use and even the worship of images was firmly established before the end of the sixth century [before A.D. 600]; they were fondly cherished by the warm imagination of the Greeks and Asiatics; the pantheon and Vatican were adorned with the emblems of a new superstition.... The style and sentiments of a Byzantine hymn will declare how far their worship was removed from the grossest idolatry: ‘How can we with mortal eyes contemplate this image, whose celestial splendor the host of heaven presumes not to behold? He who dwells in heaven condescends this day to visit us by His venerable image. He who is seated on the cherubim visits us this day by a picture which the Father has delineated with His immaculate hand; which He has formed in an ineffable manner; and which we sanctify by adoring it with fear and love.’”—Gibbon. '

All Glory Must Go to God, It Is God's.

 Have you ever wanted to direct your attention to something tangible in order to focus more fully on God? Millions want to do just that. Millions build shrines, simple or elaborate, but still they are shrines where they put their focus when they want to think on God. I have a prayer closet of sorts where I've hung several verses of the Bible- my focus on reading the words of God. I don't have a cross, or any figurine to focus on, I simply want the word of God in my sight. Yet, how many do have figurines, and altars, and candles, and pictures that they behold. Jesus never asked us to erect a statue in His likeness and we could have been told to do that, there were artists even in Jesus' time. Jesus never sat down for a portrait to be drawn of Him, suggesting that all get a copy so they wouldn't forget what He looked like. Jesus did not want us to worship His image, not ever. Jesus used the WORD, His word and we are told that His word is our SWORD in this spiritual warfare. HE used the WORD in His personal confrontation with Satan in the wilderness. He didn't whip out a statue of an image of what someone imagined God to look like and wield it at Satan threateningly.  He didn't hold up any kind of staff- trying to imitate Moses' staff that was in the Ark. He didn't yank out a miniature set of the two tablets of stone where the Law was written and placed in the Ark of the Covenant. Objects weren't used by God, never condoned by God. Our God is a God of SPIRIT- unseen, invisible, everywhere, always and never confined! He can be with us wherever we are, at any time! There are no constraints upon God. Even when Solomon built the temple where God's spirit would dwell, it wasn't confined there because EVERYONE knew that no temple could truly hold God.  There were so many false gods with temples- and the people had to go to those temples or at the least erect tiny shrines with miniature replicas of their gods in them, and they believed those idols to be their gods. We are to worship NO IDOLS. Our thoughts are NOT to be focused upon statues! Our thoughts are to be on a God who cannot be contained in any wood, stone, plastic, metal of any sort! Yes, God did set up various reminders-

Deu 6:4  Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: 

Deu 6:5  And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. 

Deu 6:6  And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart: 

Deu 6:7  And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up. 

Deu 6:8  And thou shalt bind them for a sign upon thine hand, and they shall be as frontlets between thine eyes. 

Deu 6:9  And thou shalt write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates.

WORDS- reminders- written upon posts of the house and on gates. 

Num 15:37  And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 

Num 15:38  Speak unto the children of Israel, and bid them that they make them fringes in the borders of their garments throughout their generations, and that they put upon the fringe of the borders a ribband of blue: 

Num 15:39  And it shall be unto you for a fringe, that ye may look upon it, and remember all the commandments of the LORD, and do them; and that ye seek not after your own heart and your own eyes, after which ye use to go a whoring: 

Num 15:40  That ye may remember, and do all my commandments, and be holy unto your God. 

Num 15:41  I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, to be your God: I am the LORD your God. 

REMEMBER WORDS!

Jesus didn't like how the Jewish leaders of His day used words on cloths and such and decorated themselves with them as if those things declared their righteousness with God. They weren't using them as reminders any longer even if they had started out that way, they were using them to promote their own self-righteousness. The dangers of decorations, of idols are very real.

I wear tee-shirts with various Bible/God promoting sayings/verses and I love when people tell me they like them, because that means they are others who love God. I wear these tee-shirts not because I'm righteous in anyway. I wear them because I can't speak to share God, my personality isn't such that allows for that ability, that's not something I was gifted with- and yet I want to shout to all about God's love. My tee-shirts shout for me. I don't worship the clothes I wear in any way at all. I know I'm a sinner in need of constant forgiveness. My righteousness is like a filthy rag, I have none! All glory must go to God, it is God's!

*******

'April 2, 1901

“The Keeping of the Commandments. The Second Commandment” Advent Review and Sabbath Herald 78, 14, p. 216.

“I AM the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. 

“Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.” Exodus 20:2, 4-6. 

The First Commandment forbids the having of any other god than the Lord; and so calls upon all to have God alone, and Him with all the heart, and all the soul, and all the mind, and all the strength. 

Thus the First Commandment requires all creatures to worship only the true God; and the Second Commandment forbids the worshiping of Him in any but the true way. 

The First Commandment forbids the having of any false gods; the Second Commandment forbids the having of the true God in a false way. 

It is thus forbidden to worship God, or to think of Him, under any form or representation of any kind whatever. This is made clear by the word of the Lord in Deuteronomy 4. Having described how God came down upon Mount Sinai and spoke to the people out of the midst of the fire, declaring the Ten Commandments, it is remarked especially: “Ye heard the voice of the words, but saw no similitude.” 

It is not suggested that there was no similitude there. There were similitudes: multitudes of the host of heavenly angels were there; four-winged and four-faced cherubim were there; six-winged bright seraphim were there; Christ was there; and the glory of God, which was like devouring fire, was there. 

But all this glory, and all these similitudes, were completely hidden from any eye of man by the “blackness, and darkness, and tempest: that enveloped the whole mount. For “Mount Sinai was altogether on a smoke;” and “the smoke thereof ascended as the smoke of a furnace,” which formed a “thick cloud upon the mount,” a cloud of “thick darkness;” and the voice of God was heard “out of the midst of the darkness.”

Now, why was it that this wonderful scene of glory, even the brightness of the glory itself, was so completely hidden from the eyes of the people? Here is the answer: “Ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the Lord spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female, the likeness of any beast that is on the earth, the likeness of any winged fowl that flieth in the air, the likeness of anything that creepeth on the ground, the likeness of any fish that is in the waters beneath the earth: and lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them.” Deuteronomy 4:15-19. 

If the people had been allowed that day to see any similitude, or any figure, on Sinai, they would inevitably have formed a likeness of it, as a means of their worshiping God. If they could have seen but the wings of the cherubim or seraphim, they would have used winged creatures, or the likeness of them, as a means of their worshiping God. And even though they had seen no figure or similitude, yet if only they had seen the brightness of the glory, then they would have employed the brightness of the glory, then they would have employed the brightness of the sun or the moon, or the stars, as symbols, representations, by which they would offer worship to the true God. 

Nor would they have taken these representations which they would have made as of themselves gods, so as to worship the images or representations themselves; but would have used them as visible symbols, as aids in fixing their attention upon God, the better and more exactly to worship Him. And they would have claimed all the time that, in this, they were worshiping the true God, and that such worship was true worship of God. 

But all such idea as this, even all possibility of such idea, was utterly excluded by the Lord himself, in enveloping the whole grand array and glorious scene in impenetrable darkness. And then, by this fact, and in telling them why He did it, He gave His own clear interpretation of His own Second Commandment, and the plainest possible instruction to men as to how to observe it. In this the Lord himself has given, in the plainest and most forcible way, instruction to all people, that in the worship of God no conceivable form or similitude can be used in any way, or to any extent whatever. And thus there was said at Sinai precisely what Jesus said to the woman at the well, neither more nor less: that “God is Spirit: and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth.” 

God is Spirit, and is to be only spiritually discerned, and, therefore, can be worshiped only in spirit and in truth. 

He can be worshiped only in truth as in spirit, because it is only by His word, which is the truth, that men can know what is true and acceptable worship. No man can know God except by revelation; and God must be worshiped strictly according to His own revelation: otherwise He is not worshiped at all. '