FACTS OF FAITH By Christian Edwardson
Chapter 18 Part Two
THE
LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA
Pastor A. C. Preus, in an article in Kirkelig Maanedstidende [Monthly Church Tidings], of August,
1855, endeavored to quiet an agitation on the Sabbath question that had arisen
in Wisconsin, by claiming that the Sabbath commandment simply required the
keeping of one day in seven. He wrote:
"It is a moral law, founded on a moral necessity, that a
rest day must be appointed;...but it is ceremony, resting on outward occasion
of circumstances, whether one day or another is established.
"We know that 'the law is a lamp and the commandment a
light,' and woe be to us if we would 'abolish' even one of the least
commandments and 'teach men so.' But the law, the unchangeable moral law, which
proceeds from the nature of God, says nothing about which day. The third
[fourth] commandment simply reads thus: 'Remember that thou keep holy the rest
day,' it does not say the seventh day!" (The Catholic Church dropped the
second commandment out of their catechism, and the Lutherans followed the same
numbering, making the Sabbath command the third. In the Lutheran catechism it
reads as pastor Preus here quotes it, and not as given in Exodus 20:1-17.) - Kirkelig Maanedstidende, August, 1855, pp.
94-97. Inmansville, Wis.
(183) A few Lutheran
ministers saw in this article a direct blow against the sanctity of Sunday,
others took exception to the claim that the Sabbath commandment is binding on
us. The struggle that ensued is spoken of in their book on "The Jubilee of the Norwegian Synod,
1853-1903," in the following statement:
"The struggle which began against the sects outside of
the Lutheran Church thus soon became a controversy with those who had false
ideas within the Lutheran Church itself, a controversy which was kept up till
well towards the eighties, when it gradually died away, because other points of
dispute arrested the attention." - "Festskrift," p. 239.
Decorah, Iowa: 1903.
During this long controversy much was written in their
official organ, Kirkelig Maanedstidende [Monthly Church Tidings], in
Emigranten, and in their Synodical Reports, especially from 1863 to 1866, and
discussions continued in their "Synods." The one side held to the
"Explanation of Luther's Catechism" (Oslo, 1905), which says that the
ceremonial law was abolished at the cross, but that "the moral law, which
is contained in the Ten Commandments,...is still in force,...because, it is
founded on God's holy and righteous nature, and hence is immutable as God
Himself." - pp. 5, 6.
The other party said:
"Either the words in the 3rd [4th] commandment regarding
the seventh day on which God rested are binding on us, and then we must and
shall keep Saturday, or, if these words are not in force for us, then we have
nothing to do with any definite day, or any day whatever....We notice that the
3rd [4th] commandment does not speak of one day in seven, or a seventh day, but
only and solely of the seventh day, that is Saturday. As long as they will
acknowledge this, which every honest Christian with common sound judgment
certainly must, and they also acknowledge that the New Testament nowhere
institutes or commands any other day, or says that one day in seven shall be
taken in its place, then it also must be acknowledged that there is no word in
Scripture to sustain the assertion that one day in seven is a moral
command." - "Record of the First
Extraordinary Synod of the Norwegian-Evangelical-Lutheran Church in America,"
held at Holden, Minnesota, reported in Kirkelig Mannedstidende [Monthly Church
Tidings], Aug. 1, 1862, p. 232.
(184) "To say,
that the commandment regarding outward rest (Exodus 20:10, 11) [refers to one
day in seven] is only arbitrary misrepresentation and falsification of God's
word, for it does not say 'every seventh,' but 'the seventh day, on which God
rested,' and that, every one knows, was Saturday. If therefore this commandment
concerning outward rest for man and beast is in force as a moral command for us
Christians, then we must rest on Saturday, as that is the only day on which
such rest was commanded." - Id., April 1, 1862, p. 99.
Having called attention to the fact that the fourth
commandment enjoins observance of the definite seventh day (Saturday) they then
referred to Romans 14 and Colossians 2 as proof that the Sabbath was abolished.
But those who held that the moral law is still in force, answered:
"In regard to the places, Romans 14 and Colossians 2,
these refer...to the appointed days of the Old Testament, which the contents in
the whole chapter show....By 'Sabbaths' is not to be understood the weekly
Sabbath, which, before Moses, yea already at Creation, was instituted [Genesis
2], but [they refer] to other feasts, which have been types of Christ, and
ceased at Christ's coming." - Id., September, 1863, pp. 271, 272.
The other side answered:
"Sunday, no doubt, had sacred memories, but so had the
day of Christ's death and the day of His ascension, without Friday and Thursday
thereby becoming appointed days for weekly meetings, and even if Sunday had the
most glorious memories, there would not be in that the least obligation to keep
it....After all, examples prove nothing, they only illustrate what has already
been proved. And here it actually is incumbent on those who would make
Sunday-keeping a divine ordinance to show us a definite command of God for
it." - Id., September, 1863, pp. 261, 262.
The former, in their review, quoted Matthew 5:17-19 and James
2:10,11, and declared:
(185) "If it is so
dangerous to offend on one commandment, what must it be then to wholly throw
away one commandment:...God has distinctly commanded that every tittle in His
law is to be kept. and how it will fare with those who take away from, or add
anything to, God's word we can read in Revelation. [The writer then referred to
the fate of the priests of Baal in 1 Kings 18.]" - Id., April, 1866, p.
103.
We recognize that this was an argument in which two groups of
Sunday-keepers were engaged, and in which each in his own way was trying to
present reasons for the observance of the first day of the week. But in fact,
the truths brought to light by this close study of the question prove that the
fourth commandment enjoins the careful observance, not of one day in seven, but
of the seventh day of the week in particular, that the Sabbath was instituted
at creation, that while the ceremonial feasts, which were types of Christ,
ceased at the cross, the seventh-day Sabbath did not pass away at that time,
that there is no definite command in Scripture for Sunday observance, and that
those who attempt to remove a jot or a tittle from the holy law of God by
substituting the first day of the week for the seventh day fall under the curse
of Revelation 22:19.
IN
NORWAY
The controversy in America had its counterpart in Norway and
Denmark. At the "Ecclesiastical Association in Christiania [Oslo],"
February 8-10, 1854, and at the "Theological Association of the Deans of
Drammen," held August 15, 1854, the Sabbath question was the great subject
for discussion. At first some seemed to think only of the proper observance of
Sunday, but the question soon arose, how the sacredness of the Sabbath could be
transferred from the seventh to the first day of the week. Pastor Kaurin
thought it could, but Pastor W. A. Wexels declared that this could not be done,
for "God Himself cannot transfer the reason for sanctifying the seventh
day (God's rest at creation) to another day. Besides this we have no certainty
of any transference of the day." - "Theologish
Tidsskrift for den Norske Kirke," Vol. VI, pp. 269, 630. Oslo: P.
T. Mallings, 1855.
(186) Some of the
speakers felt that the only way to get around this troublesome question was to
teach that the Sabbath commandment was abolished, but "Dean Lange found it
incomprehensible that any one who knew the sermon on the mount [Matthew 5]
could urge the abolition of the Sabbath commandment." - Id., p. 533. And
Wexels pointed out that the Sabbath commandment forms such an integral part of
the moral law that what was said against one command affected the whole law.
But he felt that as Christ had "finished" His work on the cross
Friday evening, and rested on the Sabbath, "the Christians have [thus an
appeal] on Saturday to live in...the memory of
the Lord's own rest after His work on earth was finished, and of the
Sabbath rest....If these sacred Sabbath-memories, considered as the common
property of the church, should seek an expression in a united outward service
on Saturday, it would be entirely becoming." - Id., pp. 608, 609.
During these long debates one cannot but see a carefully
worded attempt to return to the only Bible Sabbath, but who had the courage of
a staunch reformer, daring to stand out alone on Bible truths?
Dean Fr. Schiorn, of Oslo, says:
"It has been claimed, that the relation of Jesus to the
Sabbath commandment was one of protest against continued validity of this
command in the New Testament. On the whole it may be safely considered that the
effort to remove the Decalogue as the unchangeable rule of divine authority can
be traced principally to the fact that they want to blot out the Sabbath
commandment. They can, of course, see, that it is impossible to take this one
commandment out of the series of commandments as long as they acknowledge the
other nine binding and obligatory. The Ten Commandments form such a definite
circumscribed unity that they must stand or fall together. So they would sooner
let all fall than to let the third [fourth] commandment remain standing."
- "Relation of the New Testament to the
Old Testament Legislation," p. 11. Oslo: 1894.
(187) "It is clear
also that this commandment belongs to the divine law for the church. It has
always been a mystery to me, why many have such a living interest in getting
this commandment blotted from the Decalogue. That the enemies of Christianity
want the Sabbath day, or its divine validity, removed, that I can naturally
understand. But why living Christians, zealous workers in the church, want it
removed, that I cannot understand." - Id., p. 12.
"Has Jesus anywhere expressed Himself against the
Sabbath commandment or the continuance of its validity? Has He ever violated
it, or advised His disciples to violate it?
"Never! He has combated the misuse of the Sabbath
commandment by the Pharisees in the same way that He combated their misuse of
prayer, fasting, tithing, almsgiving, etc., that is, all self-righteous piety
by works, all spiritless use of the Sabbath, but never the Sabbath commandment
itself....He says (Mark 2:27): 'The Sabbath was made for man.'...God gave man -
not only the Jews - the Sabbath...and He has protected this His gift by a
definite command, which has its continued validity for the new covenant people
as well as for the people of the old covenant, because their need and
circumstances are essentially the same.
"When it is said that the third [fourth] commandment
does not obligate the church, because Jesus has not imposed on us any Sabbath
commandment, then this is to me very strange and incomprehensible talk. The
commandment was already given in the law, which Jesus would not abolish, but
fulfill. It was therefore a piece of superfluity for Jesus to give a Sabbath
command. He, as Lord of the Sabbath, has caused His church to retain it, for
which His church owes Him the very greatest thanks." - Id., pp. 14, 15.
On the other hand Pastor L. Dahle declared:
"The third [fourth] commandment is abolished for us
Christians, and has no more as a command any binding claim.
"It is a false imagination, if any one thinks he obeys
the third [fourth] commandment in the law of Moses by keeping holy the first
day (Sunday) instead of the seventh; for the commandment does not at all speak
of one day in seven, but of the seventh day of the week. If therefore the
commandment continued to be in force, then without doubt, were the Jews and the
Adventists right, when they say that if we will obey God's command, we must
keep Saturday holy. There cannot be the least doubt about this. Every attempt
to explain away this fact will and must fail.
(188) "It is
therefore only an imagination that we keep holy our Sunday according to the
requirements of the third [fourth] commandment.
"Consequently it is an established fact, that if the
third [fourth] commandment is still in force, then we must acknowledge the
Adventists to be right, and begin to keep Saturday holy. If we are unwilling to
do this, we must prove from the word of God that the Sabbath commandment is
abolished in the New Testament and is no more binding on us Christians." -
"The Adventists, Sabbath, and Sunday,"
pp. 23, 24. Stavanger; 1903.
Pastor K. A. Dachsel says, significantly:
"For this reason many godly Christians have solemnly
upbraided the Christian church for keeping Sunday instead of Saturday: it [the
church] can have no right to change God's commandment, and if in the catechism
the whole commandment had been embodied verbatim from Exodus 20:8-11, as has
been done in the Heidelberg Catechism, then we should still keep Saturday holy,
and not Sunday." - "Edifying
Instruction in the Catechism," p. 24. Bergen: 1887.
Thus we see how the truth was forced upon the minds of
leading churchmen by this prolonged discussion, and all were given the
opportunity to make their choice. But, as is always the case, no one wishes to
step out alone, they wait for all to step out in a body, a thing which has
never occurred during the whole history of the world. God's work in an
individual matter, not a mass movement.
In the discussion carried on in Denmark, Bishop Skat Rordam
and Dr. Fr. Nielson took the same stand as Pastor L. Dahle in Norway, and
"The Norwegian Synod" in America, that the Sabbath commandment was
abolished, but that the church keeps Sunday as a proper church regulation. (See
Bishop Rordam's remarks on p. 108.)
(189) On the other side
stood Dean C. O. C. E. Krogh; Pastors John Clausen, Wilh. Beck, I. Vahl, P.
Krag, A. G. Fich, and I. S. D. Branth, who declared that we have not nine, but
ten commandments. "And the Ten Commandments are God's commandments for all
men in all ages. It is that law which Christ would not destroy, but fulfill,
and the Sabbath commandment is a part of it," declared Dean I. Vahl.
Pastor P. Krag said:
"When Paul in the letter to the Colossians speaks about
the law being abolished by Christ, he refers to the middle wall that separated
Jews and Gentiles, the law of Moses. The Ten Commandments, in which Moses had
no part, were given by God's own voice, and this God wrote with His own hand as
an evidence that they should be in force for all times.' - "Report of the Second Church Meeting in Copenhagen,"
Sept. 13-15, 1887, P. Taaning, pp. 68, 69. Copenhagen: 1887.
The reports of these discussions are very interesting and
illuminating, but our limited space does not permit us to quote further. This,
however, is sufficient to show how God led one by one of the leading
denominations to investigate the Sabbath truth, and offered them the grand
privilege of carrying the Reformation to completion. If they had accepted the
Sabbath truth, He would have led them on step by step till they had reached the
divine standard of the apostolic faith. Many of the truths of God's word, which
the Roman church, during the Dark Ages, had buried beneath the rubbish of human
tradition, still lay untouched, as costly jewels beneath the sand of centuries.
These must be dug up, so that the "remnant" church could stand forth
in its apostolic purity, possessing the complete "faith which was once
delivered to the saints"; for those who shall meet the Lord in peace, when
He comes in glory, must "keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus."
Jude 3; Revelation 12:17; 14:12.
No comments:
Post a Comment