'CHAPTER
VII.
WHAT THE
ATONEMENT IS
In Part
First [part of the book] we considered the moral in distinction from the
natural system, and certain principles of Government which are universally
accepted, and arrived at the conclusion that substitutionary
sacrifice is the only means whereby a sinner can be relieved from condemnation.
And from
this conclusion, if the principles are carefully considered, we cannot see how
any one can dissent. But a substituted
sacrifice is the basis of all atonement; and hence we conclude that an
atonement is consistent with reason.
The
principles of Government and the recognition of divine justice, demand an
atonement or the entire destruction of a sinful race, confronted as it is with
the declaration, “The wages of sin is death.”
In Part
Second we have, thus far, examined the principles of the divine Government as
revealed in the Bible, in behalf of which the Atonement must be made. For, an atonement is a vindication of justice
by an offering to the broken law. And we have examined the nature of the
offering made for man’s redemption. That “the
Son of God died” there can be no doubt, except with those who prefer
their own theories to the plain testimony of the word of God. That in his death
he suffered the penalty, the full penalty, of the law, there seems to be no
ground to dispute, unless the scripture is directly denied which says. “The
wages of sin is death.” That he died for “the world,” “for all,” that he
“tasted death for every man,” is expressly declared; and of the sufficiency of
the offering there can be no doubt, admitting the declarations of the Scriptures
concerning the actual death of that
exalted being who is called the Word, who “was in the beginning,” who was in
glory “with the Father” before the world was. According to the most
commonly received views these points about exhaust the subject, it being taken
for granted that the death of Christ and the Atonement are the same thing. But
they are not identical. True, there can
be no atonement without the death of a sacrifice; but there can be the death of
the sacrifice without an atonement.
- 127 - J.
H. Waggoner
While we
have endeavored to vindicate the truth that the death of Christ was vicarious—a
truth which we cannot see how any can deny and yet profess to believe the
Scriptures—we have avoided using the common term, “vicarious atonement.” That
which is done by substitution is vicarious; and as Christ makes atonement for
others, not for himself, it is also called vicarious. But the word is properly
used in a stricter sense, as of substitution only; as that Christ does for us
just what the law requires of us. The
law requires the life of the transgressor, and Christ died for us; therefore
his death was truly vicarious. But the Atonement is the work of his
priesthood, and is not embraced within the requirement upon the sinner; for it
is something entirely beyond the limit of the sinner’s action. A sinner may die
for his own sins, and thereby meet the demand of justice; but he is then lost,
and we cannot say any atonement is made for him. The action of the priest is
not in the sinner’s stead, for it is beyond that which the sinner was required
or expected to do; and in this restricted sense it is not vicarious, as was the
death of Christ. By this it is seen that there is a clear distinction between
the death of Christ and the Atonement, and as long as this distinction is lost
sight of, so long will the term “vicarious atonement” convey a wrong impression
to the mind. Many diverse views of the Atonement exist; and there are many
whose views are vague and undefined; and we believe that both confusion and
error arise on this subject from a disregard of the above distinction, more
than from all other causes combined. We have seen (pages 127-129) that when a
man brought an offering, he was required to lay his hand upon its head; if the
people had sinned, the elders of the congregation were required to lay their
hands upon the head of the offering; but
in every case the priest made an
atonement. See Lev. 4:20, 26, 31, 35; 5:6, 10, 16, 18; 6:7; 16:30, 32, and others. “When a ruler
hath sinned… he shall bring his offering, a kid of the goats, a male without
blemish; and he shall lay his hand upon the head of the goat, and kill it in
the place where they kill the burnt offering before the Lord; it is a sin
offering… And the priest shall make an
atonement for him.” Lev. 4:22-26. Three things in this work we notice in
their order:
1. He
shall lay his hand upon the head of the offering.
2. He
shall kill it.
3. The
priest shall make an atonement.
Here it is
plainly seen that the killing of the offering and
The
Atonement - 128
making the
atonement are distinct and separate acts; and we shall find that in every case
where a sin offering was brought to the priest, he took the blood to make an
atonement, according to the word of the Lord: “For the life of the flesh is in
the blood; and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for
your souls; for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.” Lev.
17:11.
In regard
to the ceremony of laying hands upon the head of a sin offering, Rollin, in his
remarks on the Religion of the Egyptians, says: “But one common and general
ceremony was observed in all sacrifices, viz., the laying of hands upon the
head of the victim, loading it at the same time with imprecations, and praying
the gods to divert upon that victim all the calamities which might threaten
Egypt.” Thus we see that the idea of substitutionary sacrifice, or vicarious
death, was not confined to the Hebrews, but was recognized wherever the
efficacy of sacrifices was acknowledged, which must have been revealed
immediately after the fall of man.
(To be
continued)
(Excerpt
from-) THE ATONEMENT PART SECOND:
THE
ATONEMENT AS REVEALED IN THE BIBLE
(1884)
BY ELDER J. H. WAGGONER
No comments:
Post a Comment