Sunday, January 17, 2021

We Must Let Christ Live In Us.

 The law reveals a standard of right, but does not give righteousness.

The law that says you shouldn't steal, doesn't make someone who doesn't steal, righteous. The law is telling you that not stealing is the right thing to do. The law is information of a right standard. If you don't steal you've kept a right standard. If you keep a right standard that is a good thing to do, but, because of our sinful nature we could never keep the right standard perfectly- it's impossible for us on our own to be righteous, a mere thought we might have is more than enough to reveal our unrighteousness.


There is only one righteous and because Jesus Christ died for us to give us HIS righteousness, we can be one with God again. Christ's righteousness alone is our righteousness. 

*

(Excerpt)


Righteousness Without the Law. 


Since because of man's weak and fallen condition no one can get righteousness out of the law, it is evident that if any man ever has righteousness he must get it from some other source than the law. If left to themselves and the law, men would truly be in a deplorable condition. But here is hope. The righteousness of God without the law or apart from the law, is manifested. This reveals to man a way of salvation.


Righteousness "Manifested." Where? 


Why, of course where it most needs to be manifested, in people, that is, in a certain class described in the next verse. But it does not originate in them. The Scriptures have already shown us that no righteousness can come from man. The righteousness of God is manifested in Jesus Christ. He himself said through the prophet David: "I delight to do thy will, O my God; yea, thy law is within my heart. I have preached righteousness in the great congregation; lo, I have not refrained my lips, O Lord, thou knowest." Ps.  40:8, 9.


"Witnessed by the Law." 


Let no one imagine that in the gospel he can ignore the law of God. 


The righteousness of God which is manifested apart from the law, is witnessed by the law. It is such righteousness as the law witnesses to, and commends. It must be so, because it is the righteousness which Christ revealed; and that came from the law, which was in his heart. So, although the law of God has no righteousness to impart to any man, it does not cease to be the standard of righteousness. There can be no righteousness that does not stand the test of the law. The law of God must put its seal of approval upon every one who enters heaven. (End Excerpt)


*******


Christ in us- is Christ's righteousness in us- we must choose to let Christ live in us.


Saturday, January 16, 2021

God Alone Is Good.

 Meekness-

'It's enduring injury with patience and without resentment. The Holy Spirit enables us to produce meekness a necessary attitude for understanding God's word.'  (Bibletools Online)


Let's think about this statement for a moment. Meekness- something we have come to believe means being timid, reserved, more of a scaredy cat lacking bravado, a mouse in comparison to a lion. Yet Jesus was none of those things. Jesus wasn't timid, reserved, afraid, and still He was meek and our example of being meek. When we read the Bibletools.org definition and it states - meekness is ENDURING INJURY WITH PATIENCE AND WITHOUT RESENTMENT, this opens up a whole new insight into what it means to be meek. 


Enduring- when we think of enduring we automatically imagine putting up with something that is unpleasant. We endure sitting through a long, boring, monotonous speech. We endure the pain of childbirth. We endure our long work days. We endure sickness and injury.  What sort of injury did Jesus endure? He was never physically injured until a day before His crucifixion.  The injuries He endured were those of His heart. He was also abused verbally with words that struck deep chords of agony in His being. Emotional, mental pain from the refusal of so many to comprehend His real reason for taking on flesh tore at the heart of our Savior. 


Jesus' love overrode any resentment- any lingering anger felt in righteousness for the blatant wrongs all around Him. Jesus' righteous indignation was a reality- He overthrew the moneychanger's tables at the temple, but that anger was not resentment. Jesus' heart broke for the hard-hearted sinners, as it still breaks today over those who are determined to remain lost to Him. 


Jesus is the brightest example of enduring injury of any kind with patience and without resentment. Jesus NEVER felt slighted in the way we are constantly feeling our pride injured. It happens to us on a daily basis. A simple glance given to us that seems somehow offensive is enough to make us take up mental arms to defend our pricked pride. No, it really doesn't take much and we are setting up defenses for ourselves. We take such great stock in ourselves having the right to an existence without any interference in what we perceive is our path to rightful contentment with the world around us. The trouble is, that perception is different for everyone and then it comes down to trying to determine who has the real right over another's right? To say we all need to get along when what I think is the path to getting along is different than yours is to have to make a determination over whose path is that right path to getting along. You say that's where compromise comes in, and there again we have to determine who needs to compromise what, again making the idea of right subjective to personal beliefs of each other. It's one of those circular arguments in this sin-filled world. 


We hold fast to our SELF and SELF is so easily and quickly injured. 


Have you ever hurt someone (not physically, I'm not going there) only to see them take that hurt without retaliating? You can tell you've hurt them, they wince, or their expression has it written all over that you've just inflicted pain- downcast eyes, lack of any visible smile and maybe actual turned down lips- you know what I'm talking about. That expressionless expression, that void of expression is its own expression.  You've hurt someone and yet they say nothing, inwardly they are writhing in the pain you've caused them. They grow sad over the hurt you've caused and still they aren't angry at you, just hurt by you.  They endured the injury you've inflicted and often that is worse to you than if they had been provoked to anger by your wounding them. 


Still, is taking the hurt and being filled with obvious sadness truly enduring with patience? Is the sadness another form of resenting how you were treated? Jesus did not go moping about with His heart broken, though He'd have every right to. Jesus had moments of great sadness but He kept on with His purpose not letting what had to be overwhelming emotional anguish - crush His spirit. He kept on because he was living for the FATHER, and not for Himself. He endured with patience and without resentment because He kept the Father's will in His mind first and foremost. He did NOT focus on personal injury. He did NOT focus on the Father being injured. He focused on the will of the Father which is the salvation of mankind- the salvation from sin and this sin-filled, sin-wrecked world.


*

Tozer had this to say about meekness-  


'Artificiality is one curse that will drop away the moment we kneel at Jesus' feet and surrender ourselves to His meekness. Then we will not care what people think of us so long as God is pleased. Then _what we are_ will be everything; what we appear will take its place far down the scale of interest for us. Apart from sin we have nothing of which to be ashamed. Only an evil desire to shine makes us want to appear other than we are.


The heart of the world is breaking under this load of pride and pretense. There is no release from our burden apart from the meekness of Christ.'


Surrendering ourselves to Christ's meekness, to Christ's way of living. Christ lived to please the Father in all things, this was His first and foremost goal. In all He did, Christ pleased God.  Christ did NOT seek to please Himself, if He had, then He would have called those ten thousand angels and saved Himself from the torture He was soon to endure. Christ is our example of SELFLESSNESS.  Christ did NOT care what people thought of Him, not at all in any way. His only thought was of the Father's view of Him.  


Tozer saying- 'Then what we are…'   Means just that, what we are rather than what others perception of us may be. We get so caught up in the perception of others. I don't want this or that person thinking this or that about me. How many of our actions are governed by considering what others may think of us? We are taught really young to BEHAVE. Have any of you ever heard the words- "You're in public, stop behaving that way?" Or, "You don't behave like that in public."  Maybe at home you were allowed more leeway to act goofy or such, but once you stepped out into public there was a different standard of public behavior expected. Embarrassing yourself, or others by unconventional behavior is frowned upon. We are taught to care a lot about the thoughts of others, and being acceptable to them.  I am NOT advocating acting out in bizarre ways just to free yourself from caring what others think. The point I'm trying to make is how we've been trained to care about what others think and some do so to the point of obsessing over themselves and caring more about what others think than what GOD thinks. Some care too much about what others think (I'm guilty). When I read that WHAT WE ARE as OPPOSED to what we appear should mean more to us if we belong to Christ, I must take this to heart, I must contemplate this.  What we are… are we God's? This is what we need to be asking ourselves every time we get caught up in thinking about how we appear to others. How do I appear to God? Am I God's? I need these words tattooed on my mind to be triggered whenever my thoughts turn to how others are perceiving me. What OTHER'S think should not matter! If I am God's that should be my standard of being, of appearing, of existing. What am I? GOD'S!  What do others think of me? WHO CARES IF I AM GOD'S. 


Tozer says- 'Apart from sin we have nothing of which to be ashamed. Only an evil desire to shine makes us want to appear other than we are.'


Wanting to be prettier, skinnier, more outgoing, a better speaker… wanting mySELF to shine, this truly is an evil desire because the focus is on SELF and off of God.  If my focus is on God and not myself it is placed in the right way. Even if I say I want to be kinder, nicer, once more I am focusing on SELF and self taking the credit for being those things. GOD in our lives as our main focus will be those things for us, through us, as long as we are NOT bent on ultimately taking credit for being good. GOD ALONE IS GOOD.


Luk_18:19  And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.


GOD!


Tozer says- 'The heart of the world is breaking under this load of pride and pretense. There is no release from our burden apart from the meekness of Christ.'


This is TRUTH, GOD'S TRUTH.  Enduring injury, insult, suffering all things the world has ready to give us over and over again, enduring this with GOD in us, allows for no resentment, but rather allows PATIENCE. With GOD'S goodness our sole focus, self disappears into meekness, the meekness of Christ.


God be our all in all, so that we are not considered, only You. Let the Holy Spirit fill us with You.


Friday, January 15, 2021

Our Veil of Flesh.

 


Pursuit of God Excerpts From Chapter Three- Studied during Bible Study tonight at Debbie's. 

*

Removing the Veil

Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus.--Heb. 10:19

God made us for Himself: that is the only explanation that satisfies the heart of a thinking man, whatever his wild reason may say. Should faulty education and perverse reasoning lead a man to conclude otherwise, there is little that any Christian can do for him. For such a man I have no message. My appeal is addressed to those who have been previously taught in secret by the wisdom of God; I speak to thirsty hearts whose longings have been wakened by the touch of God within them, and such as they need no reasoned proof. Their restless hearts furnish all the proof they need.

God formed us for His pleasure, and so formed us that we as well as He can in divine communion enjoy the sweet and mysterious mingling of kindred personalities. He meant us to see Him and live with Him and draw our life from His smile. But we have been guilty of that "foul revolt" of which Milton speaks when describing the rebellion of Satan and his hosts. We have broken with God. We have ceased to obey Him or love Him and in guilt and fear have fled as far as possible from His Presence.

Yet who can flee from His Presence when the heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain Him? when as the wisdom of Solomon testifies, "the Spirit of the Lord filleth the world?" The omnipresence of the Lord is one thing, and is a solemn fact necessary to His perfection; the manifest Presence is another thing altogether, and from that Presence we have fled, like Adam, to hide among the trees of the garden, or like Peter to shrink away crying, "Depart from me, for I am a sinful man, O Lord."

So the life of man upon the earth is a life away from the Presence, wrenched loose from that "blissful center" which is our right and proper dwelling place, our first estate which we kept not, the loss of which is the cause of our unceasing restlessness.

The whole work of God in redemption is to undo the tragic effects of that foul revolt, and to bring us back again into right and eternal relationship with Himself. This required that our sins be disposed of satisfactorily, that a full reconciliation be effected and the way opened for us to return again into conscious communion with God and to live again in the Presence as before. Then by His prevenient working within us He moves us to return. This first comes to our notice when our restless hearts feel a yearning for the Presence of God and we say within ourselves, "I will arise and go to my Father." That is the first step, and as the Chinese sage Lao-tze has said, "The journey of a thousand miles begins with a first step."

God wills that we should push on into His Presence and live our whole life there. This is to be known to us in conscious experience. It is more than a doctrine to be held, it is a life to be enjoyed every moment of every day.

This Flame of the Presence was the beating heart of the Levitical order. Without it all the appointments of the tabernacle were characters of some unknown language; they had no meaning for Israel or for us. The greatest fact of the tabernacle was that Jehovah was there; a Presence was waiting within the veil. Similarly the Presence of God is the central fact of Christianity. At the heart of the Christian message is God Himself waiting for His redeemed children to push in to conscious awareness of His Presence. That type of Christianity which happens now to be the vogue knows this Presence only in theory. It fails to stress the Christian's privilege of present realization. According to its teachings we are in the Presence of God positionally, and nothing is said about the need to experience that Presence actually. The fiery urge that drove men like McCheyne is wholly missing. And the present generation of Christians measures itself by this imperfect rule. Ignoble contentment takes the place of burning zeal. We are satisfied to rest in our judicial possessions and for the most part we bother ourselves very little about the absence of personal experience.

Behind the veil is God, that God after Whom the world, with strange inconsistency, has felt, "if haply they might find Him." He has discovered Himself to some extent in nature, but more perfectly in the Incarnation; now He waits to show Himself in ravishing fulness to the humble of soul and the pure in heart.

The world is perishing for lack of the knowledge of God and the Church is famishing for want of His Presence. The instant cure of most of our religious ills would be to enter the Presence in spiritual experience, to become suddenly aware that we are in God and that God is in us. This would lift us out of our pitiful narrowness and cause our hearts to be enlarged. This would burn away the impurities from our lives as the bugs and fungi were burned away by the fire that dwelt in the bush.

What a broad world to roam in, what a sea to swim in is this God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. He is _eternal_, which means that He antedates time and is wholly independent of it. Time began in Him and will end in Him. To it He pays no tribute and from it He suffers no change. He is _immutable_, which means that He has never changed and can never change in any smallest measure. To change He would need to go from better to worse or from worse to better. He cannot do either, for being perfect He cannot become more perfect, and if He were to become less perfect He would be less than God. He is _omniscient_, which means that He knows in one free and effortless act all matter, all spirit, all relationships, all events. He has no past and He has no future. He _is_, and none of the limiting and qualifying terms used of creatures can apply to Him. _Love_ and _mercy_ and _righteousness_ are His, and _holiness_ so ineffable that no comparisons or figures will avail to express it. Only fire can give even a remote conception of it. In fire He appeared at the burning bush; in the pillar of fire He dwelt through all the long wilderness journey. The fire that glowed between the wings of the cherubim in the holy place was called the "shekinah," the Presence, through the years of Israel's glory, and when the Old had given place to the New, He came at Pentecost as a fiery flame and rested upon each disciple.

Spinoza wrote of the intellectual love of God, and he had a measure of truth there; but the highest love of God is not intellectual, it is spiritual. God is spirit and only the spirit of man can know Him really. In the deep spirit of a man the fire must glow or his love is not the true love of God. The great of the Kingdom have been those who loved God more than others did. We all know who they have been and gladly pay tribute to the depths and sincerity of their devotion. We have but to pause for a moment and their names come trooping past us smelling of myrrh and aloes and cassia out of the ivory palaces.

* I have risked the tedium of quotation that I might show by pointed example what I have set out to say, viz., that God is so vastly wonderful, so utterly and completely delightful that He can, without anything other than Himself, meet and overflow the deepest demands of our total nature, mysterious and deep as that nature is. Such worship as Faber knew (and he is but one of a great company which no man can number) can never come from a mere doctrinal knowledge of God. Hearts that are "fit to break" with love for the Godhead are those who have been in the Presence and have looked with opened eye upon the majesty of Deity. Men of the breaking hearts had a quality about them not known to or understood by common men. They habitually spoke with spiritual authority. They had been in the Presence of God and they reported what they saw there. They were prophets, not scribes, for the scribe tells us what he has read, and the prophet tells what he has seen.

The distinction is not an imaginary one. Between the scribe who has read and the prophet who has seen there is a difference as wide as the sea. We are today overrun with orthodox scribes, but the prophets, where are they? The hard voice of the scribe sounds over evangelicalism, but the Church waits for the tender voice of the saint who has penetrated the veil and has gazed with inward eye upon the Wonder that is God. And yet, thus to penetrate, to push in sensitive living experience into the holy Presence, is a privilege open to every child of God.

With the veil removed by the rending of Jesus' flesh, with nothing on God's side to prevent us from entering, why do we tarry without? Why do we consent to abide all our days just outside the Holy of Holies and never enter at all to look upon God? We hear the Bridegroom say, "Let me see thy countenance, let me hear thy voice; for sweet is thy voice and thy countenance is comely." We sense that the call is for us, but still we fail to draw near, and the years pass and we grow old and tired in the outer courts of the tabernacle. What doth hinder us?

The answer usually given, simply that we are "cold," will not explain all the facts. There is something more serious than coldness of heart, something that may be back of that coldness and be the cause of its existence. What is it? What but the presence of _a veil in our hearts_? a veil not taken away as the first veil was, but which remains there still shutting out the light and hiding the face of God from us. 

It is the veil of our fleshly fallen nature living on, unjudged within us, uncrucified and unrepudiated. It is the close-woven veil of the self-life which we have never truly acknowledged, of which we have been secretly ashamed, and which for these reasons we have never brought to the judgment of the cross.

It is not too mysterious, this opaque veil, nor is it hard to identify. We have but to look in our own hearts and we shall see it there, sewn and patched and repaired it may be, but there nevertheless, an enemy to our lives and an effective block to our spiritual progress.

This veil is not a beautiful thing and it is not a thing about which we commonly care to talk, but I am addressing the thirsting souls who are determined to follow God, and I know they will not turn back because the way leads temporarily through the blackened hills. The urge of God within them will assure their continuing the pursuit. They will face the facts however unpleasant and endure the cross for the joy set before them. So I am bold to name the threads out of which this inner veil is woven. It is woven of the fine threads of the self-life, the hyphenated sins of the human spirit. They are not something we do, they are something we _are_, and therein lies both their subtlety and their power. To be specific, the self-sins are these: self-righteousness, self-pity, self-confidence, self-sufficiency, self-admiration, self-love and a host of others like them. They dwell too deep within us and are too much a part of our natures to come to our attention till the light of God is focused upon them. The grosser manifestations of these sins, egotism, exhibitionism, self-promotion, are strangely tolerated in Christian leaders even in circles of impeccable orthodoxy. They are so much in evidence as actually, for many people, to become identified with the gospel. I trust it is not a cynical observation to say that they appear these days to be a requisite for popularity in some sections of the Church visible. Promoting self under the guise of promoting Christ is currently so common as to excite little notice.

One should suppose that proper instruction in the doctrines of man's depravity and the necessity for justification through the righteousness of Christ alone would deliver us from the power of the self-sins; but it does not work out that way. Self can live unrebuked at the very altar. It can watch the bleeding Victim die and not be in the least affected by what it sees. It can fight for the faith of the Reformers and preach eloquently the creed of salvation by grace, and gain strength by its efforts. To tell all the truth, it seems actually to feed upon orthodoxy and is more at home in a Bible Conference than in a tavern. Our very state of longing after God may afford it an excellent condition under which to thrive and grow. 

Self is the opaque veil that hides the Face of God from us. It can be removed only in spiritual experience, never by mere instruction. As well try to instruct leprosy out of our system. There must be a work of God in destruction before we are free. We must invite the cross to do its deadly work within us. We must bring our self-sins to the cross for judgment. We must prepare ourselves for an ordeal of suffering in some measure like that through which our Saviour passed when He suffered under Pontius Pilate.

Let us remember: when we talk of the rending of the veil we are speaking in a figure, and the thought of it is poetical, almost pleasant; but in actuality there is nothing pleasant about it. 

In human experience that veil is made of living spiritual tissue; it is composed of the sentient, quivering stuff of which our whole beings consist, and to touch it is to touch us where we feel pain. To tear it away is to injure us, to hurt us and make us bleed. To say otherwise is to make the cross no cross and death no death at all. It is never fun to die. To rip through the dear and tender stuff of which life is made can never be anything but deeply painful. Yet that is what the cross did to Jesus and it is what the cross would do to every man to set him free.

Let us beware of tinkering with our inner life in hope ourselves to rend the veil. God must do everything for us. Our part is to yield and trust. We must confess, forsake, repudiate the self-life, and then reckon it crucified. But we must be careful to distinguish lazy "acceptance" from the real work of God. We must insist upon the work being done. We dare not rest content with a neat doctrine of self-crucifixion. That is to imitate Saul and spare the best of the sheep and the oxen.

Insist that the work be done in very truth and it will be done. The cross is rough, and it is deadly, but it is effective. It does not keep its victim hanging there forever. There comes a moment when its work is finished and the suffering victim dies. After that is resurrection glory and power, and the pain is forgotten for joy that the veil is taken away and we have entered in actual spiritual experience the Presence of the living God. 

_Lord, how excellent are Thy ways, and how devious and dark are the ways of man. Show us how to die, that we may rise again to newness of life. Rend the veil of our self-life from the top down as Thou didst rend the veil of the Temple. We would draw near in full assurance of faith. We would dwell with Thee in daily experience here on this earth so that we may be accustomed to the glory when we enter Thy heaven to dwell with Thee there. In Jesus' name, Amen._


Thursday, January 14, 2021

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Will We Listen?

 God speaks to people- Exo 19:9  And the LORD said unto Moses, Lo, I come unto thee in a thick cloud, that the people may hear when I speak with thee, and believe thee for ever. And Moses told the words of the people unto the LORD. 


The PEOPLE may hear.  


The people HEARD God. 


Moses wasn't speaking hearsay, he wasn't alone in hearing God in this moment.  The people could hear when God spoke with Moses.  Why did God allow this? Because, He wanted the people to BELIEVE. He knew that the people could simply say all this is Moses' doing, these are Moses' words not God's. When they actually heard God's voice they could no longer believe that it was all Moses' doing.  Yes, they'd been given miracle after miracle, but still, mankind are prone to doubt. 


When you hear for yourself the voice of God, you can no longer doubt without doing yourself a grave disservice.


The voice of God spoke the TEN COMMANDMENTS, they spoke the ROYAL LAW.  God's speaking to us is found in His law for all time.  


God's voice- we can hear it in His word.


Will we listen? 


(Excerpt)


The Grand Conclusion Romans 3:19-22


19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law; that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. 20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight; for by the law is the knowledge of sin. 21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; 22 even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe.


Within the Law. 


This is not the place to consider the force of the term "under the law," since it does not really occur here. It should be "in the law," as in Romans 2:12, for the Greek words are the same in both places. The words for "under the law" are entirely different. Why the translators have given us "under the law" in this place,  and also in 1 Corinthians 9:21, where the term is also "in the law," as noted in Young's Concordance, it is impossible to determine. 


There certainly is no reason for it. 


The rendering is purely arbitrary. 


What the verse before us really says is, "Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are in the law," or, "within the sphere or jurisdiction of the law." This is an obvious fact, and in view of what immediately follows, it is a very important fact to keep in mind.


"What the Law Saith." 


The voice of the law is the voice of God. 


The law is the truth, because it was spoken with God's own voice. 


In the covenant which God made with the Jews concerning the Ten Commandments, he said of the law, "Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice." etc. Ex. 19:5. The commandments were spoken "in the mount out of the midst of the fire, of the cloud, and of the thick darkness, with a great voice." Deut. 5:22. 


Therefore when the law of God speaks to a man, it is God himself speaking to that man. Satan has invented a proverb,  which he has induced many people to believe, to the effect that "the voice of the people is the voice of God."  This is a part of his great lie by which he causes many to think themselves above the law of God. Let every one who loves the truth, substitute for that invention of Satan the truth that the voice of the law of God is the voice of God.


Tuesday, January 12, 2021

Monday, January 11, 2021