(Excerpt)
HOW SHALL
WE CONSIDER CHRIST?
But how
should we consider Christ?—Just as He has revealed Himself to the world;
according to the witness which He bore concerning Himself. In that marvelous
discourse recorded in the fifth chapter of John, Jesus said: "For as the Father raiseth up the dead,
and quickeneth them; even so the Son quickeneth whom He will. For the Father
judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son; that all men
should honor the Son, even as they honor the Father. He that honoreth not the
Son honoreth not the Father which hath sent Him." Verses 21-23.
To Christ
is committed the highest prerogative, that of judging. He must receive the same
honor that is due to God, and for the reason that He is God. The beloved
disciple bears this witness: "In
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
[9] with God, and the Word was
God." John 1:1. That this Divine Word is none other than Jesus
Christ is shown by verse 14: "And
the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us (and we beheld His glory, the glory
as of the Only-begotten of the Father), full of grace and truth."
The Word
was "in the beginning." The mind of man cannot grasp the ages that
are spanned in this phrase. It is not given to men to know when or how the Son
was begotten; but we know that He was the Divine Word, not simply before He
came to this earth to die, but even before the world was created. Just before
His crucifixion He prayed,
"And now, O Father, glorify thou Me with Thine own self with the glory
which I had with Thee before the world was." John 17:5. And more
than seven hundred years before His first advent, His coming was thus foretold
by the word of inspiration:
"But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the thousands
of Judah, yet out of thee shall He come forth unto Me that is to be ruler in
Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from the days of
eternity." Micah 5:2, margin. We know that Christ "proceeded forth and came from
God" (John 8:42), but it was so far back in the ages of eternity as
to be far beyond the grasp of the mind of man.
Joh 8:42 Jesus said unto
them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came
from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.
Excerpt-
Christ And
His Righteousness.
E.J.
Waggoner
*******
WWN
(Excerpt)
EDITORIAL
VERBAGE
A recent
series of articles by the Editor of the Review has
attempted to explain the Palmdale Conference Accord and thus assure the laity
of the Church that there were no compromises with the historic truths of
Adventism in the areas of righteous ness by faith and the
Incarnation. (l) But he did not tell the laity the background
which necessitated this conference, and without this background no one can
properly evaluate the statements of doctrine agreed to by the participants
including the Editor and the President of the General Conference.
This
conference resulted from the doctrinal agitation concerning the Incarnation and
Righteousness by Faith In the Australian Division. The manuscript prepared and
published by Mrs. Gillian Ford, wife of the head of the Theology Department of
Avondale College, sets forth the position taken by the faculty of that
department. Elder F. A. Basham in a paper presented to the Biblical Research
Committee of the Australian Division established certain facts to show that the
manuscript while bearing the name of Mrs. Ford was clearly the thinking of Dr.
Desmond Ford and his cohorts. (2) Further, Robert Brinsmead in
a special "thought paper" which was not to be circulated among church
members in which he confirmed his wholehearted agreement with the Ford
position, stated that the manuscript prepared by Mrs.. Ford has "the
endorsement of Dr. Ford and the Theology Department of Avondale
College." (3) The manuscript itself expresses
"indebtedness" to each member of the faculty, and gives their
names. (4)
The first
paragraph of the "Introduction" of this manuscript prepared by Mrs.
Desmond Ford presents the issue clearly as it can be stated. It reads: A
correct understanding of the human nature of Christ is crucial for a balanced
presentation of Righteousness by Faith. Although the central emphasis of this
paper is not Righteousness by Faith, the main reason for attempting it is to
lay a foundation for a right understanding of that very topic. It could be put
this way. What you believe about Christ's humanity will have a very strong
influence on what you believe about Christ's righteousness, and both in turn
will influence your view of Christian perfection. (5)
This
analysis between the Incarnation, Christ's Righteousness, and Perfection is
absolutely true, and this is why the whole of this discussion is so critical,
and this is why the pronouncements found in the Palmdale Accord are so
spiritually dangerous in the compromise made in regard to the Incarnation.
Mrs. Ford
stresses Six Propositions and gives what the Theology Department teaches on
each, contrasting what they believe to be "The True and the False
Gospels." We shall note two of these which were a part of the Palmdale
Accord, and what the Accord had to say about them.
p· 2
In
Proposition #1 on the Nature of Christ, the manuscript stated -"The True
Gospel" says that "Christ took on Adam's sinlessness but not his
strength." The "Other Gospel" says that "Christ was exactly
like us in His human nature." And what does the Palmdale Accord say about
these two positions? After quoting Romans 8:3, Heb. 2: 14, 17, and 2 Cor. 5:21,
they agree that: Not all Christians view these passages
alike. For example, for some they mean that Jesus did not commit sin in either
word, deed, or thought; for others they mean that Jesus not only committed no
sin but was without the inherited tendencies to sin common to fallen humanity.
And what
was the conclusion?
Whichever
of these views Christians may hold of Christ's humanity, we believe that the
central concept is to recognize Jesus as the Saviour of all mankind, and that
through His victorious life, lived in human flesh, He provides the link between
divinity and humanity.(7)
While the
Editor of the Review in
his attempt to explain away the Munich at Palmdale, admits "that the
Palmdale statement does not label one view as orthodox and the other as
heretical" he seeks to place his emphasis of belief on the side of the
question which the faculty of Avondale labels as the False Gospel. But since he
signed the Accord which permits either belief, he must charitably state that ,
"Christians who are humble and possess the spirit of the Master will be
loving and charitable, not critical and harsh, toward church members and
leaders who hold views different from their own." (8) This is a
false charity, unless the doctrine of the Incarnation is unimportant. The
faculty of Avondale do not consider it so, and drew a line clear and distinct
from their viewpoint which is contrary to the historic teaching of the
Seventh-day Adventist Church relative to the doctrine of the
Incarnation. (9) Evidently the Editor of
the Review has not been reading the Great Controversy of late in which the charity he
manifests is labeled - Satanic liberalism! Observe closely these words:
The
position that it is of no consequence what men believe, is one of Satan's most
successful deceptions. He knows that the truth, received in the love of it,
sanctifies the soul of the receiver; therefore he is constantly seeking to
substitute false theories, fables, another gospel. From the beginning, the
servants of God have contended against false teachers, not merely as vicious
men, but as inculcators of falsehoods that were fatal to the soul. Elijah,
Jeremiah, Paul, firmly and fearlessly opposed those who were turning men from
the word of God. That liberality which regards a correct religious faith as
unimportant, found no favor with these holy defenders of the truth. (10)
The sixth
proposition set forth by Dr. Desmond Ford's wife is in regard to
"Righteousness by Faith". She writes that "The True Gospel"
teaches "Righteousness by Faith is justification alone." "That
Other Gospel" states -"Righteousness by Faith is both justification
and sanctification." It should also be understood that in the explanation
of this position which the Faculty of Theology at Avondale labels as "That
Other Gospel", Mrs. Ford indicates that "Adventists in contrast to
the New Testament have often used the expression Righteousness by Faith to
include sanctification."(11) Thus the position of the Seventh-day
Adventist Church -and this involves the messages not only of the servant of the
Lord, but also those brought through Elders Jones and Waggoner -is declared to
be in direct opposition to what·
p 3
-- is termed New Testament teaching.
Now what
does the Palmdale Accord say? "We agree that when the
words righteousness and faith are connected (by 'of', 'by', etc.) in
Scripture, reference is to the experience of justification by faith." Then
the Accord notes that the concept of the righteousness of God in the Bible
encompasses more than merely justification as set forth by Paul in certain of
his letters. "Therefore, although we are justified by the merits of the
blood of Christ and through the instrument of faith, It is also true that works
of loving obedience are the evidence of saving faith. ...Thus Seventh-day
Adventists have often used the phrase 'righteousness by
faith' theologically to include both justification and
sanctification." (12) It should be clear to anyone reading the
Palmdale Accord with the knowledge of what the heretics of Avondale are
advocating that the Church was sold out on two points: - I) That righteousness
by faith is justification alone, and 2) That the Church is teaching contrary to
the New Testament in their theological use of the phrase. We agreed to the
first point as advocated by Avondale theologians, and acknowledged their charge
against the teaching of the Church as correct!
Now let it
be clearly understood by every reader of this thought paper there was no need
to agree to the proposition that when the phrase "righteousness by/of
faith" is used by Paul, he is referring only to what the heretics of
Avondale call justification. Read Galatians 5:4-7; Hebrews 11:7; and then note
also the faith of Abraham as recorded In Hebrews 11:8-12, 17, remembering that
Paul In Romans 4:16 declared him to be "the father of us all." We do
not need to make accommodations for the teachings of Evangelical Protestantism,
which in reality is no more than a revival of apostate Protestantism. We need
to understand the message of the Second Angel of Revelation 14 in its historic
setting when the pronouncement went forth - "Babylon is
fallen." (13)
What
attitude should we, therefore, assume in this crisis over truth? We would do
well to Review the lessons to be learned from the experience of the early
church. So long "as persecution continued" the early Church
"remained comparatively pure, but when it ceased, "converts were
added who were less sincere and devoted." "When Christians consented
to unite with those who were but half converted from paganism," the way
was opened for Satan to use the compromisers to direct their "warfare
against the most essential doctrines of Christ." (14)
Some of us can remember the time when it was difficult to be a Seventh-day
Adventist because to keep a job, and to keep the Sabbath were in direct conflict.
Converts to the Church were few compared to the number of baptisms reported
today. Then came the change, and into the Church came affluence and numbers.
The simple faith and Bible teachings which marked our departments of theology
were not enough for those who wished to be like all the churches around about
them. So we introduced men who had degrees In theology from the great
universities of Europe -and the same results have followed that followed in the
Early Church. Warfare has been made against the most essential features of the
doctrines of Christ, that is, unless the Incarnation, and Righteousness by
Faith through our Lord Jesus Christ are not essential doctrines of Christ!
The
inspired commentary on what our attitude should be is given in the record of
how those early Christians who wished to preserve their faith reacted to the
apostasy they had to meet. Read with care and prayerfully these
words: After a long and severe conflict, the
faithful few decided to dissolve all union with the apostate church if she
still refused to free herself from
p ·4
falsehood
and idolatry. They saw that separation was an absolute necessity if they would
obey the word of God. They dared not tolerate errors fatal to their own souls,
and set an example which would imperil the faith of their children and
children's children. To secure peace and unity they were ready to make any
concession consistent with fidelity to God; but they felt that even peace would
be too dearly purchased at the sacrifice of principle. If unity could be
secured only by the compromise of truth and righteousness, then let there be
difference and even war. (15)
(1) Kenneth
H. Wood, "F. Y. I", Review,
October 21, 28, November 4, 18, 1976
(2)
F. A. Basham, A Paper Presented to
the Biblical Research Committee of the Australian Division on the Subject of
"Righteousness by Faith", Feb. 3, 1976, p. 1
(3) Robert
D. Brinsmead, Thought Paper -"The Current Righteousness by Faith
Dialogue", p. 1
(4) Gillian
Ford, The Soteriological
Implications of the Human Nature of Christ, p. 3
(5) Ibid., p. 2
(6) Ibid., p. 8
(7)
Palmda1e Accord, Review,
May 27, l976, p. 5
(8)
Kenneth H. Wood, "F. Y. I.", Review,
November 18, 1976, p. 13
(9) Adventist
Laymen's Foundation, An
Interpretive History of the Doctrine of the Incarnation oas Taught by the
Seventh-day Adventist Church.
(10)
Ellen G. White, The Great
Controversy, p. 520
(11) Ford, Op. Cit, pp. 9-10
(12)
Palmda1e Accord, Review,
May 27, 1976, p. 4
(13)
El1en G. White, The Great
Controversy, pp. 380-381, 383
(14) Ibid.,
pp. 44-45
(15) Ibid., p. 45
DO YOU
KNOW WHY?
Beginning
with the October 28, 1976 issue of the Review,
there appeared in consecutive issues a series of five articles on the
"Role of Israel In Bible Prophecy." Do you know why these were
prepared and published at this time? All that was told by the editorial staff
is that these articles were a result of research done by the Biblical Research
Institute directed by Dr. Gordon M. Hyde. (l) The full story was not
revealed as to why this research became necessary at this time.
This past
year, The Harvest Press published a book co-authored by Elders R. Allan
Anderson, former Ministerial Secretary of the General Conference, and Jay
Milton Hoffman, who established and directed the Times Square Evangelistic
Center in New York City. It is entitled -All
Eyes on Israel. The introduction to this book - six pages in all -was
written by none other than Elder H. M. S. Richards, Sr. It is a glowing
commendation of what is written in the book itself, and the reader is urged to
study carefully some of thoughts expressed, even though they may be new to him.
Dr. Kenneth Vine wrote the foreword. (2) The thesis of this book is
that Israel became a state in 1948 under the Providence of God, and has yet a
part to play in the purposes and plans of God according to the Covenant made
with Abraham and with his descendants. Several statements are quoted from the
Spirit of·
p 5
Prophecy
to support this contention but a close reading of these statements in context
indicates that they are not saying what the authors are trying to make them
say. It is true that the servant of the Lord did indicate that a work was yet
to be done for the Jewish people, and that many would respond. (3)
But these statements do not indicate that Israel as a nation would ever be the
chosen people of God again after 34 A.D.
The first
three articles of the series appearing in the Review were right on key and presented the relationship
between the promises of God to Abraham, and how they will be fulfilled in the
new "congregation of the Lord" who came into being in the New
Testament as the "ecclesia", or called out church of
Christ. (4) The fourth article introduces the well-known smear
technique -"guilt by association." In other words because certain
modern day interpreters of prophecy, who teach the secret rapture and other
futuristic concepts also Include Israel as a State in their order of last day
events, then any study of the fulfillment of prophecy that would relate to
Jerusalem is also labeled, "futurism." This is very poor scholarship,
and should be beneath the use of the General Conference Biblical Research
Committee headed by Dr. Hyde.
The book
by Dr. Anderson and Dr. Hoffman takes the position that the fulfillment of Luke
21:24 -"the times of the Gentiles" -occurred In 1967. And this is
absolutely correct. The last article of the five in the Review seeks to void this
conclusion. The arguments are weak, and the rules of interpretation used by the
associate editor of the Review violate
the principles of hermeneutics which are set forth in a book edited by Dr.
Gordon Hyde himself and which was used in the 1974 North American Division
Bible Conferences. (5) Because this last article not only strikes at
the book by Anderson and Hoffman, but also strikes directly at the monograph
prepared by the Adventist Laymen's Foundation -The Times of the Gentiles Fulfilled -we shall discuss
this fifth article in detail in the next thought paper.
(1) "This
Week", Review, October
28, 1976, p. 3
(2)
Roy Allan Anderson & Jay Milton Hoffman, All
Eyes on Israel, pp. 243 (The Harvest Press, Ft. Worth, Texas, 1976)
(3)
Ellen G. White, Review &
Herald, June 29, 1905
(4)
Walter F. Specht, "New Testament Israel", Review, November 11, 1976, p. 9
(5) A Symposium on Biblical Hermeneutics,
Editor, Gordon M Hyde, p. 176
DO THEY
REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY VOTED?
The 1976
Annual Conference Action on Evangelism stated: It could well be that we
are standing under a certain indictment of Heaven for not
courageously and faithfully pursuing the finishing of God's work through direct
evangelism, and that because of a "business as usual" attitude the
calls for revival have not been followed with desired results as God has
promised. (The Ministry, Dec.
1976, p. 4)
Did the
hierarchy when they voted these words consider the Divine Purpose in Vol. 8, p.
247, par 2 in Testimonies for the
Church? Could these men subconsciously
p· 6
know what
Heaven's indictment is, and now they are going to attempt to storm the gates of
Heaven for a reversal of the Divine Decree? Interestingly, this part of the
action was omitted in the report to the laity of the Church through the Review. See December 2 ,1976, p. 14,
col 2 -deletion marks after first paragraph of "The Real Issue". Thus
for the laity the "real issue" was covered up!
THE
ADVENTIST PROPERTIES & MORTGAGE TRUST
(See Special Report, September, 1976,
"Observation #2" for Review of
details.)
From very
reliable sources, I have been advised that this planned Trust has been dropped
like a "hot potato". I was further advised that two of the proposed
Managers of this project could not be "bonded." A friend in
California after reading the Special
Report went to the State Capitol in Sacramento and checked
"Corporations Record, a division of the Secretary of State Office."
In a letter to me dated, September 29, he reported: I checked to find what
legal status this Adventist Properties & Mortgage Trust has. I was
surprised there is none. Nothing of this kind is registered. If it was, it
would be to some extent regulated by the corporate laws. I then went to the
Justice Department where Charitable Trust Companies are registered. I talked to
the Deputy Registrar and showed him that portion of the paragraph on your page
2, Special Report,
"Observation # 2". He said their records show no such entity. But he
did want to pursue this further to find out by writing Adventist Properties why
they are not registered and if they think that their church connection exempts
them from registering, then to give their reasons.
The very
reliable source also advised me that Elder George Vandeman of IT IS WRITTEN
telecast was pushing hard for this adventure in a $3,000,000 loan to the
Seventh-day Adventist Radio-Te1evision-Film Center by the Adventist Properties
& Mortgage Trust. This latter fact may account for the irritation caused
among the staff of IT IS WRITTEN when some laity after reading Special Report wrote directly
asking about IT IS WRITTEN'S involvement, and the use made of their funds.
Jan.
1977 -
"Watchman, What of the Night? " Thought Paper. Adventist Laymen's Foundation. (Excerpt)
No comments:
Post a Comment