The Perpetuity of the Royal Law
Or, The Ten Commandments Not Abolished. Advent
and Sabbath Tract, No. 4.
By J. N. ANDREWS
Continued….
Having shown conclusively that the law of God was neither
abolished by the teaching nor by the death of the Son of God, we will now
examine the third question:-
3. Was the law of God abolished by the apostles?
It may seem to some individuals that this last question is
propounded in a singular form. But if the law of God was not abolished by the
teaching nor yet by the death of the Son of God, it follows that if abolished
at all, it must have been by the apostles. Many have asserted that the apostles
re-enacted nine of the ten commandments, to take the place of the ten which
ceased at Christ's death: but as we have shown that the Son of God offered
himself up as the great Propitiation for the transgression of the law, and not
as the means of its abolition, it follows that the ten commandments must be
abolished by the apostles, before they could re-enact one of them. It is no
more absurd to speak of the apostles' abolishing the ten commandments than it
is to speak of their re-enacting nine of them. And if it seem absurd to any
individual to believe that the apostles abolished the ten commandments and then
re-enacted nine of them, we ask them to consider whether the doctrine which
represents the infinite Law-giver as doing this very thing, is not a still
greater absurdity?
If the apostles abolished the law of God, who gave them authority?
The Son of God indeed commissioned them to teach all things whatsoever he had
commanded them; but we have seen, in all his teaching to them, that he
maintained the immutability of his Father's law, so that from their divine
Master they never received such a commission. If they taught as he taught, we
shall find them setting forth the perpetuity and immutability of the law of
God. And that they did speak the same doctrine which their Lord had taught
them, we have divine assurance. John14:26. If the apostles abolished the law,
they must have done it in the very epistles in which, according to some of our
opponents, they re-enacted nine of the commandments for the gospel
dispensation. These epistles were written not far from A. D. 60; so that if the
law of God was abolished by the apostles, it was abolished about thirty years
after the crucifixion.
We have presented the question in this form, that attention might
be called to the folly of those teachers who represent the apostles as
legislating upon the law of God. A single testimony from the apostle James
ought to make those blush for shame who represent the apostles as abolishing
the law of God, or as reenacting a part of it, to take the place of the
original code. "There is one
Lawgiver who is able to save and to destroy." James 4:12. From the
preceding verse it is certain that James thus designates Him who gave the law
in person at the first; that law, the authority of which he so distinctly
recognizes in chapter 1:25; 2:8-12. According to James, there is but one such
being in the universe; namely, the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only
wise God. It is therefore the height of absurdity to represent the apostles as
amending, abolishing, or re-enacting the law of God. The twelve apostles never
yet attempted to dethrone the one Law-giver, or to usurp any of his
prerogatives.
To be continued…..
No comments:
Post a Comment