Psa_25:11
For thy name's sake, O LORD, pardon mine iniquity; for it is great.
Isa_55:7
Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let
him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for
he will abundantly pardon.
Jas
4:8 Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands,
ye sinners; and purify your hearts, ye double minded.
Jas
4:9 Be afflicted, and mourn, and weep: let your laughter be turned to
mourning, and your joy to heaviness.
Jas
4:10 Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you
up.
1Ti
1:15 This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that
Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.
1Ti
1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus
Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should
hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.
*******
Our
relation to the Government while we are in that position, and our relation to
the means of our restoration, should be considered with great carefulness and
candor.
VII. THE
SINNER MUST ACCEPT, NOT MAKE, CONDITIONS
This
proposition must be evident to all, for 1. Treason is the highest crime. He who
commits murder takes a life, but he who seeks to subvert the law, seeks the
destruction of life’s safeguard, of that which is to protect life by preventing
and punishing crime. Hence, it is the aggregation of all crimes.
2. The
Government has the sole right to free there from. By this is meant that the
Government has the sole right to dictate the terms or conditions by which
rebels may be restored to citizenship.
This is
true, also, in regard to all crimes for which pardon is desired. And this
right, Government ought to exercise. No criminal has any right to dictate the
terms of his own pardon, or the means by which he may be restored to the favor
of the Government.
And no one
who has any regard for violated rights, for down-trodden justice, for the
sacred principles of law and order, could be willing to see the traitor
unconditionally restored to place and favor. No Government would be safe
pursuing such a course; neither could it command respect.
3. He who
will not accept the conditions is a traitor still. If the Government has the
sole right to dictate terms to rebels, which all
The
Atonement - 34
must
allow, then the transgressor can only change his relation to the Government by
accepting those terms; and if he refuses to accept them, he, of course,
persists in maintaining his position in rebellion. Or to substitute terms of
his own would be no better, but rather an insult to the Government, a denial of
its right and authority. If a criminal were to dictate how crimes should be
treated, government would be a farce and become the contempt of honest men.
Therefore
two things must be required of a transgressor or rebel, which only can be
accepted, to wit:—
1.
UNQUALIFIED SUBMISSION TO THE LAWS WHICH HAVE BEEN TRANSGRESSED, and,
2. A
HEARTY ACCEPTANCE OF THE PLAN OR CONDITIONS OFFERED FOR HIS RESTORATION.
An
objection is often urged against this view, viz., that if a substitute be
accepted and the penalty of the law be laid upon him, then there is no
pardon—no mercy, but justice only in the transaction. For, says the objector,
if the debt be paid by another person, it cannot justly be held against the
principal; payment cannot be twice demanded. The fatal fault of this objection
is this: It regards crime as a debt, which it is not.
A man may
owe a debt without any guilt attaching to him; but not so of sin. In the very
first step there is mercy toward the sinner in the acceptance of a substitute
in his behalf; and after the substitute has suffered the penalty, the sinner is
as deserving of punishment in his own person as he was before. He has done
nothing to relieve himself of the odium of his crime. All must see, at a
glance, that what has been said about the acceptance of conditions is a
necessary part of this system of pardon, as the Government not only needs
satisfaction for the past, but a safeguard for the future.
This the
mere payment of a past debt would not furnish. Therefore the acceptance of a
substitute who volunteers to bear the penalty of crime opens the way for pardon
to be granted consistently with justice. Now if the criminal accepts that
substitute so as to make the offering his own, and fulfills the required
conditions, so that he unites his efforts with those of the substitute in
honoring the law, then the Government has its safeguard against future
rebellion. But without this, all the evils of
- 35 - J.
H. Waggoner
unconditional
pardon may accrue from the action of the sinner, even though a substitute have
suffered in his behalf. But if the law be honored by the suffering of the
substitute, and the sinner cease to sin, and accept the conditions, as herein
proposed, there remains no difficulty. The Government is honored in the justice
of the transaction, and the sinner is justified and saved by its provisions of
mercy. But if any of these particulars be lacking, the system will then be
defective.
Pardon
granted on any other terms tends to iniquity, violating the principles of right
and justice, and subverting government.1 It is unnecessary to argue, but well
to mention, that a substitute, to render satisfaction to justice, must be free
from condemnation in his own life; he must be innocent in the sight of the law,
or free from its transgression. For one criminal to offer his life for another
would not be any satisfaction to justice, seeing his own was already forfeited.
RIGHTS OF
SUBJECTS
While
advocating the claims of the Government, we must not lose sight of the truth
that the subjects have claims on justice also. As very much is due from the
subjects to the Government, so something is due from the Government to the
subjects. It is expected of a Government to establish its laws, and of the
subjects to obey them;
The
Atonement - 36
1. This is
a necessary deduction from the very plain facts set forth in this argument.
There are two theological systems extant which stand opposed to these
principles; one, claiming that man may and will be saved without accepting and
complying with conditions, or without substitution. This is Universalism, which
really denies the Atonement. The other is Antinomianism, which claims that the
law is abolished when the Atonement is made, instead of being honored and
vindicated by it. Both these systems are denials of justice, and tend to
subvert the principles of government as established by reason and the
Scriptures. But as these principles lie at the very foundation of the divine
Government, the above systems are, though professedly Christian, practically
infidel. but it should be able to present tangible and substantial claims to
obedience. We notice, then,
1. The
Government must plainly reveal its laws. It is recorded of a certain tyrant
that he caused his laws to be posted at such a height that they could not be
read, and then punished those who did not keep them. This was injustice—it was
indeed tyranny. It is law that defines our duty; and in order that obedience
may be justly enforced, such declaration of duty should be clear and distinct:
not left to supposition, or to doubtful inference. We have before considered
that a moral government, a system above nature, is acknowledged; but what is
due to that government our consciousness, or moral sense, does not inform us.
On this point, our opinions, if not guided by revelation, will be as various as
our impulses, our interests, or the difference of our circumstances and
education. But if our duties be left to our own judgments, with our conflicting
feelings and interests, our determinations will be so various that confusion
and anarchy must unavoidably be the result. It would in truth be no law—no
government. Was ever a government known that proclaimed no laws, but left all
actions entirely to the choice of the subjects?
No! there
could be no government under such conditions. Shall we then admit that God, the
Creator of heaven and earth, is a moral Governor, and this we do by admitting a
moral system, and yet deny his justice, his wisdom, and, in fact, his very
government, by denying the revelation of his will, or law, to man? Such a
denial is too unreasonable to be tolerated; it involves conclusions too absurd
and derogatory to the divine character. It is really sinking Deity below our
ideas of a wise human governor. But again: As it is the prerogative of the
Government to ordain its laws, so it is its sole prerogative, prerogative, as
we have seen, to determine the means whereby a rebel may be restored to
citizenship, and as the law must be plainly revealed to serve the purposes of
justice, so,
2. The
Government must plainly reveal the conditions of pardon. The right to ordain
conditions being exclusively in the Government, the subjects or offenders can
have no means of ascertaining them, except by direct revelation. If left
without this, they can never be
- 37 - J.
H. Waggoner
restored;
for it would be absurd to leave the offenders to devise their own means. That
would be to place the dearest rights of the Government into the hands of
criminals, a thought unworthy of consideration. In all this we plainly see that
one demand of justice is a written revelation. And so reasonable is this, so
consistent with the plainest principles of justice, that, instead of objecting
to a written revelation, every one that is capable of reasoning correctly
should expect such a revelation, as strictly necessary to the moral Government
of God.s
(To be
continued)
(Excerpt
from-) THE ATONEMENT-AN EXAMINATION OF A REMEDIAL SYSTEM IN THE LIGHT OF NATURE
AND REVELATION. (1884)
BY ELDER J. H. WAGGONER
No comments:
Post a Comment